True scientists know that science doesn't have the purpose of
answering philosophical questions.
Not exact matches
(Barron's) • In Search of the Perfect Recession Indicator (
Philosophical Economics) • A Fireside Chat With Charlie Munger (MoneyBeat) • Complexity theory and financial regulation (Science) • Five Pieces of Conventional Wisdom That Make Smart Investors Look Dumb (CFA Institute) • This Lawyer Is Hollywood's Complete Divorce Solution (Bloomberg) • Curiosity update, sols 1218 - 1249: Digging in the sand at Mar's Bagnold Dunes (Planetary Society) • The Plot to Take Down a Fox News Analyst (NYT) • Ask the aged: Who better to
answer questions about the purpose of life than someone who has been living theirs for a long time?
«either way, such demythologizing claims * everything * is a myth» -------------- We are no closer to
answering the great
philosophical questions of existence (like «why are we here?»)
The biggest of
philosophical and theological
questions such as life after death can only be
answered with faith or educated speculation.
Noddings»
answers to these
questions have won her praise in feminist and leftwing circles; her book is hailed by Rosemary Ruether and Daniel Maguire as an «important contribution to
philosophical ethics» and a work that should be «significant» in theological seminaries.
This then is something like an
answer to the
question, «What caused my
philosophical development?»
These
questions take us far beyond the present state of our discussion, and I suspect that the present stage of
philosophical development is not yet prepared to
answer or even perhaps properly to formulate such
questions.
The probable
answer is that in these lectures he was addressing an audience of modernist liberal rationalists, and wanted to persuade them that even their own
philosophical system had to concede at least some room for nonrational opinions on public
questions, and therefore for religious opinion.
Its purpose was the discussion or the
answering of
questions coming from the scientific and
philosophical criticism of Christianity.
Its purpose was the discussion or the
answering at
questions coming from the scientific and
philosophical criticism of Christianity.
Again and again one reads of a master who
answers a disciple's
philosophical question with a complete and insulting non sequitur of nonsensical quality.
The concern with the wholeness of man rules out the attempt to
answer the
question of what man is in terms of particular
philosophical disciplines:
The form in which the
answers to these
questions have come is not so much that of systematic treatises as of concretizations of alternative
philosophical models: the open classroom, gay marriages, tire commune, house churches.
Fourth, Heidegger's «thinking» is so yieldingly devoid of overt
philosophical convictions that it produces neither any
answers nor even any very interesting
questions.
The only
question, then, is whether any psychical concept is truly analogical; and Hartshorne here appears to support his affirmative
answer by appealing to the
philosophical beliefs peculiar to psychicalism.
To
answer that
question, the results of historical study of Christianity can be subjected to
philosophical analysis to determine the essence of Christianity, that which defines it and yields criteria by which to assess any particular teaching, institution, or practice that claims to be «Christian.»
One's
answer to these
questions is influenced by one's theological and
philosophical critique of modernity.
The inherently necessary borders of science could best be protected in the future if all scientists were to agree to draw a clear, careful, and inviolable line between scientific and
philosophical / religious truth - that is, if they would conscientiously seek to avoid making purportedly scientific statements concerning
questions whose
answers lie beyond the scope of scientific inquiry.
He is a witness to how science is looking for
answers about the world and is having to deal with
philosophical and religious
questions.
Editor's Reply We would simply note that at a
question and
answer session with representatives of the new movements held at Pentecost Pope Francis made the following comment, which seems to dovetail with the emphasis Mr Keeffe places on devotion to the Real Presence: For us Christians, poverty is not a sociological,
philosophical or cultural category.
It is also the
question that
philosophical naturalism is supposed to have
answered exhaustively in the negative, without any troubling explanatory lacunae, and that therefore any aspiring
philosophical naturalist must understand in order to be an atheist in any intellectually significant way.
But how can the natural sciences
answer larger
questions of
philosophical meaning?
The various theological controversies of the early centuries of Christianity — regarding our understanding of the two central mysteries of the faith, the Incarnation and Trinity — saw the
question itself first deepened and clarified, and then
answered with
philosophical rigour.
No reason at all, for I am not suggesting that there is actually a final
philosophical system — e.g. idealism, and Hegelianism in particular — or that it is necessary for our exegesis to take over the actual
answers that philosophy gives to the existential
question of the meaning of my own particular existence.
Karl Rahner's idea of «anonymous Christians» was one
answer to that
question, backed by a complex
philosophical and Christian theology.
Like Wittgenstein, Whitehead is not, of course, opposed to the concept of a «
philosophical illness;» the difference lies in the seriousness with which the two thinkers approach traditional
philosophical issues: Wittgenstein seems to see no legitimacy in
questions that science or common sense can not
answer, while Whitehead struggles with classical metaphysical problems, stepping beyond the strict boundaries of the scientific method.
«The
philosophical question that has not been
answered in origin - of - life studies is this: How can a universe of mindless matter produce beings with intrinsic ends, self - replication capabilities, and «coded chemistry»?
Manchester United's experienced Dutch manager Louis van Gaal has always been a bit of a thinker, giving much more well - rounded and
philosophical answers to
questioning than many of his counterparts.
We don't need to be dissected and posed thought provoking
philosophical questions to give meaningful
answers.
In the end, I don't think that this
question has a good «politics»
answer and is more of a
philosophical issue.
A broader
philosophical question also needs
answering: what's the point of the Labour Party?
AS A professor of ethics at King's College, London, Jonathan Glover is accustomed to using the Socratic method to help his students refine their moral beliefs by
answering tough
philosophical questions.
For example, there is probably a material
answer to
philosophical questions about the nature of reality.
The program, with Sagan's poetic strolls through time and space, asked big
philosophical questions with
answers that amounted to a college level introduction to cosmology.
In the end, perhaps fittingly, Allen's film plays more like a moral and
philosophical musing than a fully realized story, leaving audiences with existential
questions to ponder with afterward, even if its
answers are more potently wrestled with in his own more masterful works on similar subjects matter in Crimes and Misdemeanors and Match Point.
As Glenn Ford continues to seek out
answers, he, a very fact - driven man, must face these
philosophical questions, and in the end,
question his own belief system.
I used it to show students»
answers / work to
philosophical questions associated with God.
Topics Include: - Christian Beliefs about God - Miracles - The Trinity - Effect of belief in God on community -
Philosophical Arguments for / against - Comparisons to Buddhism - Design vs Evolution - Nature of Christian Worship - How to
answer exam
questions
Philosophical or Debatable: These types of
questions are honestly debatable
questions that have complex possible
answers.
Philosophical or Debatable: These types of
questions are honestly debatable and have complex possible
answers.
From the country's
philosophical position on high - stakes testing, to the methods of efficiently implementing policies, Ng
answered questions about the thought process behind education reform in Singapore over the previous decades, and the secrets to its success.
Now, that's a
philosophical question that I want an
answer to, because I know I'm going to struggle with it.
It's a mind - melting
philosophical question, but the
answer is simple for the masters of brand management.
We'll research empirical evidence that helps
answer the main
philosophical question arisen by your paper
Using
philosophical approach to your
question without supporting any position your essay will no longer be argumentative and turn into abstract reflections without the
answer.
It turns out that the
philosophical line between human and machine can actually be quite blurry, and the
questions you are asked never seem to have easy
answers.
The title of this project programmatically refers to the namesake book by Hannah Arendt, whose
philosophical thought tried to
answer the key
question of the past century — how to be and stay Human in the face of the drama of History.
The exhibition has a resounding
answer to that
question, and it has nothing to do with serenity, harmony and the resolution of deep
philosophical anxieties that is supposed to attend old age.
Indeed, one leaves the exhibit with more
philosophical questions than
answers.
Clearly there is no absolute
answer to this
question — there is always some
philosophical possibility of error in any measurement — but I'm asking it in a spirit of practicality.