Will Razer's
answer be on point?
Not exact matches
Dig Deeper: How to Build a Culture of Employee Appreciation How to Create a Company Philosophy: School New Hires
on Company History Even if you ask some
pointed or provocative questions in the interview and get the
answers you
're looking for, your newest recruit isn't going to
be integrated into the company culture
on day one.
So whether it
's interacting with customers
on Facebook, Twitter, Yelp, YouTube, Pinterest, Tumblr, LinkedIn, Google +, or its own blog, across all these touch
points the company says it tries to
answer every comment posted by customers and fans — whether it
's retweeting customer tweets, replying to mentions, or following people.
In some cases, however, these
answers are wrong — and not just humorously wrong but dangerously so because they
point to inaccurate stories or offensive opinions
on important topics.
If you
were interviewing for an important job, and the CEO of the company asked you this question
point blank (which has one right
answer for getting you that job offer) what would you say
on the spot?
In contrast to the relatively gentle first Senate hearing
on Tuesday, House lawmakers
were more
pointed with their questions
on Wednesday, with several of them interrupting Zuckerberg when they felt he
was giving evasive
answers.
At this
point, most companies understand that they need to
be interacting with their customers
on the Web —
answering their questions
on Facebook, following them
on Twitter, etc..
The celeb can then choose to
answer these questions by responding directly to the fan, at which
point the fan will likely freak out
on their Twitter page that Kim Kardashian just
answered their query as to how she lost her baby weight (it
was the Atkins diet).
It may
be as simple as having a leaderboard and assigning
points based
on correct
answers and completed objectives.
Because people invest time
on LinkedIn, a proven approach
is to help your audience perform their jobs better,
answer questions, and help address pain
points.
The
answer is not, as such histrionics imply, to do less for the elderly, most of whom depend
on Social Security and Medicare (Dean also makes the
point that you don't do the young a favor when you fail to adequately support their aging parents).
Though the
answers to these important questions
are unknown at this
point, investors don't have to sit idly
on their hands awaiting the outcomes.
Work with Investors and Raise Capital They
are also able to always clearly
answer the key questions: ▪ How much capital the need to raise ▪ What does success look like in 12 months ▪ Who
is on the team and why ▪ Use of funds ▪ Who
is in charge ▪ The go - to - market strategy ▪ How to recruit talent So for those who still feel compelled to build startups, a good starting
point is to understand what it takes, and what the expectations
are.
The banks will argue hey
are existing loans simply rolling over so we may not know the
answer for a while
on this
point.
Use language appropriate to the visitor based
on the target audience Heat maps show an F pattern
is used when scanning content, so using bold headings and sub-headings to make it easier to scan and break up a copy Change paragraphs to bulleted lists Put the main
point first (inverted pyramid) Use personal pronouns Put yourself in the place of the visitor and consider questions the visitor may have, then get to the
point with the
answer Add links, if appropriate, to keep the visitor engaged
on your site and to keep them from searching elsewhere Name links (and anchor text) in a way that the visitor will know what to expect when they click Find out what keywords visitors
are searching for to reach your site and write with these keywords in mind These tips
are a great starting
point for anyone wanting to optimize their website content.
The question
is ridiculous, since yes, the religious leaders (Jews) had a hand in killing Jesus, but the conclusion that modern Jews
are responsible
is also ridiculous, as well as the insistence
on retracting the question by the ADL, whose whole
point is to prevent people from blaming modern Jews, not whether the
answer is true or not.
If I
point to my great - uncle's diary and say that the
answer on gay marriage can
be found in his private opinion
on the matter, I would
be laughed at.
@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they
are supposed to
be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it
is said Abraham believed God and it
was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you
are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance
is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i
am aware of has all the
answers at this
point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there
are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more
is discovered.I find it amazing that God
is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.
its simple, to the
point and their
answer is genuine, without wasting a lot of time... get to the
point and let them talk about what
's on their heart
«The whole
point is that subjective
answers are meaningless
on morality.
To Eric.G, to
answer your question, It
is my
point of view that Jesus (PBUH)
is the Son of God based
on the simple statement that reads «god made man in his own image».
See the
answer above — I see the Genesis narratives as God graciously reaching down to an ancient culture in order to communicate to them that he
is their creator, that they
are alienated from him, and that he desires that they
be restored to fellowship through his offer of covenant with him (ultimately
pointing to the need for God to step into history himself as the One who can keep the covenant
on our behalf).
No doubt some of them
are, but that
is beside the
point» which
is, that many, many of these voters have legitimate concerns to which an effective politics must give
answers, not lectures
on racial etiquette.
This
is why, at one
point in the book, I grant the Gnostics of old the validity of their questions, though I go
on to revile the
answers at which they arrived.
I
'm sure at some
point someone has had to go to the bathroom so bad they decided not to shoot the next person and decided to go relieve themselves instead, so based
on your logic, the
answer is yes.
Austin, before I
answer your question, my
point in re-posting the piece
is — if God got rid of all the evil people
on earth there'd
be no one left.
We had the first baptism of slave converts in the Velloor school; between fifty and sixty
were present, and (from) the numerous candidates for baptism nineteen
were admitted into the visible Church of Christ... Their hearty responses and decided, brief and
pointed answers as to motives... -LCB- and -RCB- strictly consistent Christian conduct for many months past,... left no doubts
on our minds that many of these, I hope all,
were already members of the invisible Church of Christ.36
Students
were asked to give their
answers on a five -
point scale.
The Lord God
answers through his Son Jesus Christ in Romans 2:16 - You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment
on someone else, for at whatever
point you judge the other, you
are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things.
Santorum had a strikingly weird
answer on «Don't ask, don't tell,» but his big
point that the military shouldn't
be governed by social engineering seem to have resonated.
@ let us pray just like to say it
is great that you rely only
on science (and assume you have a «higher» intelligence as such) but I'd just like to
point out that science has no
answers or purpose.
Here
's the
point: Whatever Tim Tebow
's motives might
be (and I think they
are pure), his prayers
on the field tell the world that God hears and
answers the prayers of some people more than those of others.
I reflect
on the incident in the gospel where Peter
pointed to another person and asked Jesus» what about him» Jesus
answer was, in effect» Don't worry about what I do with him, you just follow me».
Jeremy i
am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has
been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she
was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they
were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This
is the
point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it
was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds
are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus
was saying to her and us
is chose life and do nt look back that
is what he meant and that
is the walk we need to live for him.That to me
was a revelation it
was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things
on salvation so i might mention those
on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really
is making me press in to the Lord for
answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz
This speaking of God may ultimately only
point to the question which
is man himself and thus hint at God's mystery in silence, the result may
be less adequate than any statement
on another subject, the
answer, aimed at God's bright «heaven», may ever again fall back into the dark sphere of man or may consist in inexorably upholding the question that transcends any definition, formula or phenomenon.
We
are here
on earth to have our faith tested (much more than that but this for the questions sake) Would there
be a
point to a test if we
were given the
answers?
Within a local area, numbers of churches will tacitly accept an ecumenical
answer by simply
pointing out that «signing» for the deaf
is carried
on at one or more specific churches in the city, and deaf members in a church where such signing
is not practiced
are in effect invited to the church where it
is, even though that church may
be of another denomination.
@ c - casa said, «We
are here
on earth to have our faith tested (much more than that but this for the questions sake) Would there
be a
point to a test if we
were given the
answers?»
I
was tempted at first to give maybe a 10
point list of advice for parents going through deconstruction in front of their kids... things like let them see the books you read and
answer their curiosities about them; teach your kids how to think, not how to believe; tell them everything you
're going through and let them deal with what it means for them; ask them what they believe and listen objectively and engage in conversation about it; openly share your struggles with what you
're going through with the church and let them process it themselves, and so
on.
The Holy Father's spontaneous
answer on this
point to the priests of Aosta diocese during his first summer vacation (see page 7)
is full of compassion and understanding.
But if there
were really no
answer we should
be obliged to conclude that, although the course of Evolution
was «directed» up to the emergence of Life, beyond that
point all that goes
on is a scattering
m every direction.
I would definitily like to pursue this at a later date, I
'm sure I'll see you pop up around here again, because I do have
answers, more questins, more
points of contention and so
on, but Happy Hour calls and I can not turn her down, who knows, if you
're in DC we might bump into each other and not even know it!
If one
points out that,
on the societal view, the primordial nature can no longer
be temporally prior, the
answer is that this
is true and that, moreover, it must
be true
on any Whiteheadian view.
Phrygian to me i sense that you
are struggling with issues in your mind that you cant reconcile and these issues
are affecting what you believe in your heart and therefore your faith in God.I had something similar happen to me recently regarding the story of the demon possessed man at one
point the demons begged Jesus to cast them into the pigs does that mean that Jesus
was implicated with the work of satan.It cast my mind into doubt and then i began to question who God
is.I prayed and sort the holy spirit for an
answer the
answer i got
was that Gods character never changes he
is always holy righteous and sovereign why else would satan ask for his permission.So the
answer was that he allowed satans purpose to prevail so that we can see that satans intention
is always to destroy it may well have
been that the pigs
were his anyway.As they
were for the gentile nations who offered the pigs to their demon Gods.Just as satan can not change who he
is the destroyer the thief the liar God can not change who he
is when we realise that despite what we see going
on in the world God
is still the same yesterday today and forever.The time
is coming when those that have hurt others will
be judged for there wickedness as we serve a holy and just God.Just as it
was in the times of Noah so it
is with this this generation that as the wickedness reachs its zenith then the Lord will return to judge the nations.He
is coming again and we need to
be ready it
is not a time to
be caught sleeping.brentnz
My only
point was, from the get go, I don't think dropping atomic weaponry
on Jerusalem
is the
answer.
The limitation
on this
point, however,
is that people do have the spontaneous ability to fit within the overall harmonies in ways that minimally harmonize, that barely meet the categoreal obligations; the price paid for this diminution of one's rhythmic
answer to nature's pulses
is the necessity to erect a barrier of a narcissistic image of self and world to which one
answers instead.
One can and ought to find what
is the Christian
answer for himself, but just because there
is so much of vital importance that
points in either direction, he has no right superficially or dogmatically to impose it
on another.
«Unquestionably the problem which here lies before Psycho - physics can not
be sharply
answered; but we may establish a general
point of view for its treatment, consistently with what we laid down in a former chapter
on the relations of more general with more particular phenomena of consciousness.»
I
'm not really expecting an
answer this time, either, but I wanted to
point out that you have utterly fallen flat
on your face in the «put up or shut up» department.
My last
point and Im out... Throughout our great nations history... we always found a way to fight through national issues and come up with solutions... Giving the problems we have now to people in the 50's and 60's... and they may actually come up with a solution... if you earnestly care about making a change... start at the lowest levels of government... go do something... find out costs... expenses... how to get more health care to people... do things like that... quit waiting
on the government to provide all the
answers... its not the way this country
was founded... and not the way we get through problems... If you or ur family does nt have insurance... get a job that can provide you that... instead of hoping the government will do so... If you or ur family lacks access to education... move to an area that excels at it... education
is invaluable... Do something about your problem... and quit waiting for the next big lotto...