Sentences with phrase «answers at least some questions»

Not exact matches

On the day I arrived, there were at least a half dozen Amazon employees (wearing bright orange so you could easily spot them) helping shepherd people into the store, replacing items on shelves, checking IDs for those shoppers headed to the liquor shelves, and mostly answering lots and lots of questions.

Even though most interviews include at least a few of the most common interview questions, and even if the candidate is asked to answer one or two unusual interview questions (like these), the answers can seem a little too rehearsed and a lot insincere.

Some argue that employees are more apt to answer survey questions positively — creating a sense that everything seems fine (at least on the surface).

Most importantly, I would recommend commenting on every post and answering every question in your Facebook group (at least initially).

«Only 64 percent of participants in the hotter room agreed to answer at least one question compared to 95 percent in the cooler room,» notes Bergland.

Answering yes to 5 of the 10 questions above would suggest you approach matters from a Quantum perspective at least 50 % of the time; the more you answer yes, the higher the percentage of your time is spent leading from a Quantum perspective.

Space payments are still at least a decade in the future, Marcus said, but some basic questions need to be answered.

Thankfully, science (or at least one scientist) has an answer to this question — and it's just the answer I was hoping to hear.

The answer to that question is simple: Because it's so hard to do and it's very inefficient, Niu says, at least if businesses take the «traditional» route of asking for and then evaluating employee surveys.

The civility index from McMaster University and a Toronto - based research firm rated all Parliamentarians who asked or answered at least 50 questions during the last sitting of Parliament.

The next step is to use your research to identify patterns and commonalities from the answers to your interview questions, develop at least one primary persona, and share that persona with the rest of the company.

He took it all in stride, appearing confident and poised throughout the question - and - answer period (at least, that's what professional PR experts quoted by Bloomberg had to say).

«The answer may be entirely innocent,» Mr. Denton said, musing on the question of whether Mr. Harder was paid by someone other than Mr. Hogan, «but I think in order for people to understand what's going on here, what the stakes are, I think it's important that it be out in public, or at least that he'd be asked the question in public.»

Creation is beautiful and good, and humanity upholds God's image within it; creation is fallen, evil, corrupt; creation can be, and will be, restored — that triune intuition of Christian faith provides a template of meaning that at least attempts an answer to Gauguin's questions.

Almost anything Biff ever talked about could be fashioned into at least a partial answer to that question.

The mysteries of the brain may be virtually endless, but a team of researchers from two institutes in Göttingen, Germany now claim to have an answer for at least one question that has remained a puzzle: just how fast does the brain forget information?

He at least was prepared to offer a partial answer to the question: it may not be 24 - hour days, and that's what I believe.»

@Sabio I can't speak for Kris, but since, at least superficially, kris and I seem to have similar views in this area I will answer your question for myself.

@ Derrick Yu, This actually may come as a shocker, but there are believers out there who still continue to ask questions about God, about the Universe, and so forth, and unlike certain atheists out there who if they can't get definite answers to just come to conclusions that can not be verified like conclude that there is no God, at least there are believers out there who at least are willing to at least be open to the possibility that there is a God, and from there they develop their faith, which even though is not a perfect knowledge, at least can help keep those minds open, unlike certain atheists who take the easy way out and convincing themselves that it is a fact that there is no God, when in reality it is not a fact at all.

Furthermore, they seem happy to accept one unanswered question in return for being able to use God to answer any number of other questions, at least until better answers can be found through science and reason.

If you can't answer yes to questions like these, you shouldn't be voting for this individual — even if their presidency would guarantee Saturday Night Live greatness for at least four years.

Donald Cole, who used to host the Open Line Bible Answer Call in Radio Show says that without fail, he receives at least one, sometimes as many as five questions about eternal security during every single show.

Well, there are at least two ways of answering this question.

Nevertheless, when it comes to the water baptism, you know, the outward sign of the internal stuff, I believe there is another answer to the question why Jesus» disciples never immersed «in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit «(as in Mt 28:19), at least is not recorded in the Acts, but «in the name of the Lord Jesus «(as in whole book of Acts, starting from 2:38).

Kermit you idiot, if you're going to reply to my post, at least TRY to answer the question I asked.

Indeed, ecclesial theology has always asked and tried to answer this question, at least when this theology has been personally responsible without emancipating itself from the Church and her faith.

We understand very well — at least I hope we do — that owing to the principles of Protestantism this question is difficult to answer.

I've found that the answers to questions such as these (those which ring true, at least) tend to be those which are arrived at in my own way and own time, rather than being delivered by others.

The probable answer is that in these lectures he was addressing an audience of modernist liberal rationalists, and wanted to persuade them that even their own philosophical system had to concede at least some room for nonrational opinions on public questions, and therefore for religious opinion.

After eight years of doing this and now dealing with two teenagers living under my very own roof who ask the same question, I've got the answers down pat and can dismiss my students at the bell confident that they have at least a hazy sense that maybe going to church next Sunday wouldn't be a complete waste of their time.

At least you're honest, even if you won't answer a simple yes or no question.

But, I will give you yet another chance to demonstrate at least rudimentary ability to understand and answer a simple question:

That question has been frequently posed in recent months, and the implicit answer has been «yes» or at least «maybe.»

Yet, now an answer to the epistemological side of this question is also available (or at least a perspective on it).

That question, at least for the present phase of the struggle, has been answered for us by the High Command.

The statement answers these questions, at least implicitly, in the affirmative.

Martin: Asking you to answer a question isn't trolling but obviously you don't have an answer or at least you don't care.

Then I recall the old Jewish teaching that some questions have no worldly answer or perhaps are better left unanswered at least until the sequel (e.g., Darth Vader's paternal relationship to Luke Skywalker was revealed in the second — or was it the fifth?

Science at least offers a methodical approach to answering questions.

A second way in which people at least implicitly answer for themselves the question, «What makes life worth living?»

Supposing the word «God» had disappeared without leaving any visible gap and without being replaced by another word which would have a similar effect on us, which would pose at least the one fundamental question, even though we do not want to give or hear this word as an answer.

At the outset, it should be observed that a valid answer to the Christological question must, on the one hand, give full weight to the empirical fact of the revelation and, on the other, must avoid including as an essential element of itself anything not at least latent or implicit in that empirical facAt the outset, it should be observed that a valid answer to the Christological question must, on the one hand, give full weight to the empirical fact of the revelation and, on the other, must avoid including as an essential element of itself anything not at least latent or implicit in that empirical facat least latent or implicit in that empirical fact.

But at least some of the questions we face are different from the questions Paul faced, and in order to answer those questions, we may need to explain the Gospel in new ways.

@UncleM: If you had taken the time to read, or at least research the Bible, you would have the answer to your question.

The controlling idea was that since both sides wanted solid information, they could at least agree on what questions should be asked, and then jointly hire the best researchers to find the answers.

Answering questions Mr Wallen agreed that, on the day he killed Mrs Maguire, Cornick told «at least 10 other pupils precisely what he was going to do - where he was going to do it and how he was going to do it».

But the question of how to interpret the doctrine of the universality and unsurpassability of Christ in the context of inter-religious dialogue is now with us for good, and the fact that it will not go away means that we may be at least a little closer to an answer than we were before.

The difference between answering a question someone asked and answering one they did not is that the person, in our experience, is at least a thousand times more likely to hear our answer in the former instance.

For the first time in history the answers to all three questions seem, for a large number of intellectuals at least, to depend completely upon the answer to the prior question: «Who are we?»

So, to answer your question: the kind of «knowing» I apply to scripture is not of an objective / historical / scientific kind, but a kind that is, at least for me, no less true.