Sentences with phrase «answers right the first»

Not exact matches

Because there's no physical headquarters, incoming calls to the businesses» toll - free numbers go first to a South Carolina answering service, which forwards them to the right employee.

With your answers, she says you want to strive to «demonstrate that you're the right fit for the job, too, by conversing like a colleague from the very first «hello.»»

For me, it means thinking about unique ways to help solve some of society's biggest problems, with the courage to not always have the right answer the first time.

But the question of why anybody in the secular world would turn to the Amish for business advice in the first place is answered right off the top in Erik Wesner's Success Made Simple: An Inside Look at Why Amish Businesses Thrive (Jossey - Bass).

So, have you figured out what the right answer to our first question is yet?

The first answer that pops into your mind isn't necessarily the right answer but it opens up your other options.

You do know that he has answered what was tantamount to your thesis statement / first statement of your argument, right?

Without making a list first of who has a right to which truth or who will handle the answers the best.

what is very interesting to me tonite is the folks who are positive there is no god... what is equally interesting is the snarling that appears whenever one does not «toe» the atheist line of no god... It has been said over and over here, «there is no proof of your God» ad nauseum I might add... OK... please, I am asking you in the nicest possible way... explain to me, without a Designed, where the universe and all it entails, first got its source... I really would like to know... from everything I see, I see beauty, design, tragedy, poetry, poverty, etc.... How did we begin to name or classify any of this... what intelligence gave us our intelligence... I have yet to see an anwer posited as to how it all came about, absent a Designer... I will wait for an answer... How did it ALL get here, and explain the precision and engineering of it all — right down to the last jot of DNA.

You're right, Your Answer, what should not matter is whether it was a «couple» having the children as much as the fact that they (gays and lesbians) chose to have them in the first place by whatever means.

He may be an intellectualist who believes that incorrect behavior by itself prevents the achievement of the First Good; if so, he can now disagree intelligibly with his dissenting Traditionalist brother who supposes that the self does its perfecting work by obtending — that is, by moving the persona to seek right answers as best it can, given its particular resources and circumstances.

I guess they must be right since they had the answers first.

@Chance, That being said, there are promising hypotheses that are being investigated such as, an «RNA world» and «metabolism first», but nothing is yet definitive and speculation is not the right answer.

For the answer to the messiness of pluralism, when it risks turning into the full - blown dictatorship of relativism (or other forms of dictatorship), is not to construct monistic castles in the sky — an effort in the twenty - first century that will, like similar efforts in the 1930s, come to grief, and from both left and right.

I'm ashamed in our club, we are no longer one of the top teams, for the first time since Moses did loads of religious crap spud are our equals, all the banter from utd, city and chelsea fans is becoming true and hard to answer We are no longer a force in Europe, the top teams don't even try and sign our players anymore, we are a buisness and you and every gunners fan is just a customer, thumb me down if you want but you know it's right Tell me how many world class players we have now and who's after them?????????

Team Kornblatt would get a goal from Adam Goldberg to strike first in this one but Team Apuli would answer right back and tie it up at 1 very quickly..

ESPN tweeted out a video link of the Cavs making the first 11 threes, to which the Hawks Twitter account, known for its entertainment, had a short but right to the point answer.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

still no answer hey am not saying I want them to be first choose right now I know for some unreasonable opinions most don't like I.MIQUAL BUT HEY.

To answer the first is easy, as right now, Spurs are obviously a better team than Arsenal.

She answered your questions about what's in store for you and your newborn in those first 48 hours of nursing — and how to make sure breastfeeding gets off on the right, er, breast, for both you and your baby.

I remember it myself: Legislators will say that this is an intrusion into their private business and they will be right, but my answer is that their private business has intruded into state government first, and that public service is a privilege and an honor and it is a sacrifice that they must make.

The attorney found himself answering questions this week about his plan to file a federal lawsuit alleging a conspiracy against Paladino's First Amendment rights — even though he didn't initially make that information public.

I covered it in detail in my answer on Skeptics here, the exact quote of # 19 for example is: «The partition of Palestine in 1947 and the establishment of Israel is null and void from the very beginning, whatever time has elapsed because it was done contrary to the wish of the people of Palestine and their national right to their homeland and contradicts with the principles embodied in the charter of the UN, the first of which is the right of self - determination

Graham said several businesses in his constituency exported goods to China, and noted: «Constituents raise issues of human and animal rights in China, which it is easier to answer when you have first - hand experience».

«He defended it with — they have a First Amendment right, she's not his puppet, and that she felt very strongly about a grand jury decision,» Mullins said on the AM970 show «The Answer.»

The answer depends on which event occurred first and how long each took — and right now, scientists just don't know.

«People have hinted at that before, but we think this is the first definitive paper that shows mathematically why that's the right answer.»

They're not taught, «Oh, it's ok to not get the right answer the first time and go back to the drawing board,»» he said.

But, «in school, kids are taught to get the right answer the first time.

Twenty groups submitted answers to both contests, but the first to get it right was a team led by David MacKay, another former student of Hopfield's now at Cambridge University in the United Kingdom.

Based on ENCODE's findings, scientists can now ask better questions — ones that will yield better answers than was possible right after human DNA was first mapped nine years ago, Eric Green told Science News.

«We defined the science questions that need to be answered first and then brought the right people together who can help answer those questions, so it really is a dream team,» said Sue Clark who will lead the Energy Frontier Research Center.

It's called Dialogue and it's just the right supply to document about the first words of your baby, silly conversations with a loved one, sweet answers of younglings, real conversations from your life.

But a lot of the time, the answer that might seem right is only a reflection of the difficulties you are experiencing — and, first and foremost, of the fear of failure.

From how to choose the right dating site to where to take a first date, the blog answers many common concerns for senior men and women attempting to date in the modern age.

We'll help answer all your mature dating and relationship queries.From setting up the perfect mature dating profile and sending your first message right through to meeting in person, we're here to offer expert advice at every step of your mature dating journey.

im pregnant an looking for a job an I don't care nothing about sex my child comes first an if u men think that is selfish u can just move right along im here for friends an nothing else an I don't wont no one to contact me an ask me for sex because if u do I will not answer you message u will be del...

The feature itself runs under 80 minutes, but bonus features include a clutch of trailers and a 12 - minute making - of featurette in which director Maloney sits for an interview and answers questions about the genesis of the project, which was (unsurprisingly) his first right out of film school.

Each escape room has the following contents: ♦ Teacher Instructions with Usage Guide and FAQ ♦ 20 Multiple Choice Questions ♦ 5 Decoders for each of the 5 Levels ♦ Student Recording Sheet and Teacher Answer Key ♦ Link to an optional, but recommended, digital breakout room Important Note: Each topic utilizes the same types of puzzles American History: ♦ 13 Colonies ♦ American Heroes ♦ American Revolution ♦ American Symbols ♦ Bill of Rights ♦ Black History Month ♦ Boston Tea Party ♦ Branches of Government ♦ Christopher Columbus ♦ Civil Rights ♦ Civil War ♦ Cold War ♦ Declaration of Independence ♦ Dust Bowl ♦ First Thanksgiving ♦ French and Indian War ♦ Gilded Age ♦ Great Depression ♦ Industrial Revolution ♦ Jamestown ♦ Lewis and Clark ♦ Lost Colony of Roanoke ♦ Louisiana Purchase ♦ Martin Luther King ♦ Mexican American War ♦ Oregon Trail ♦ Plymouth Colony ♦ Progressive Era ♦ Reconstruction Era ♦ Spanish American War ♦ Texas Revolution ♦ War of 1812 ♦ Westward Expansion ♦ World War I ♦ World War II Ancient History: ♦ Ancient China ♦ Ancient Egypt ♦ Ancient Greece ♦ Ancient India ♦ Ancient Rome ♦ Ancient Mesopotamia World History: ♦ Absolute Monarchs ♦ Age of Enlightenment ♦ Aztec Empire ♦ Crusades ♦ Explorers ♦ French Revolution ♦ Inca Empire ♦ Maya Civilization ♦ Middle Ages ♦ Ottoman Empire ♦ Renaissance ♦ Titanic ♦ Vikings ♦ World War 1 ♦ World War 2

If you play the youtube clip included first, it will show your students that they can say what they think and that there are no right or wrong answers.

There is resistance at first — students have the habit of waiting to be told what the right answer is.

Lemov describes various tactics the teacher can use to elicit the 100 percent right answer from the student (or first from another student, before having the original student repeat or extend the correct answer).

Assessment at the end of the training will most likely be failed on the first go and force the learner to go back and not read but cherry - pick the text for the right answers just to finish the task and be done.

Often, without reframing the problem, you're searching for answer to a question that is not the right question to ask in the first place.

While his first class of the day had generally gotten the right answers, his second class was struggling.

Learning shouldn't end at the first «right» answer.

It's hard to reconcile this reflective approach with standardized assessments, with their expectation that students respond to questions by giving the right answer in the right form the first time.

«The first time you see an answer sheet where, on a test with 40 questions, there was an average of 18 answers changed from wrong to right in a single classroom, it's not really a «eureka» moment,» he says.

Don't worry about how many right or wrong answers you get the first time you complete a worksheet.