Sentences with phrase «answers right the first time»

Not exact matches

For me, it means thinking about unique ways to help solve some of society's biggest problems, with the courage to not always have the right answer the first time.

I'm ashamed in our club, we are no longer one of the top teams, for the first time since Moses did loads of religious crap spud are our equals, all the banter from utd, city and chelsea fans is becoming true and hard to answer We are no longer a force in Europe, the top teams don't even try and sign our players anymore, we are a buisness and you and every gunners fan is just a customer, thumb me down if you want but you know it's right Tell me how many world class players we have now and who's after them?????????

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I covered it in detail in my answer on Skeptics here, the exact quote of # 19 for example is: «The partition of Palestine in 1947 and the establishment of Israel is null and void from the very beginning, whatever time has elapsed because it was done contrary to the wish of the people of Palestine and their national right to their homeland and contradicts with the principles embodied in the charter of the UN, the first of which is the right of self - determination

They're not taught, «Oh, it's ok to not get the right answer the first time and go back to the drawing board,»» he said.

But, «in school, kids are taught to get the right answer the first time.

But a lot of the time, the answer that might seem right is only a reflection of the difficulties you are experiencing — and, first and foremost, of the fear of failure.

It's hard to reconcile this reflective approach with standardized assessments, with their expectation that students respond to questions by giving the right answer in the right form the first time.

«The first time you see an answer sheet where, on a test with 40 questions, there was an average of 18 answers changed from wrong to right in a single classroom, it's not really a «eureka» moment,» he says.

Don't worry about how many right or wrong answers you get the first time you complete a worksheet.

After looking at the sample test for the first time and learning some tips at a recent training, he began asking students a lot of questions — to «elaborate» or «justify» their answers even when they have the right answer.

The entire buying process didn't feel rushed, he gave a great price right from my first inquiry, all my questions were always promptly and thoroughly answered, and I felt comfortable 100 % of the time.

Although there is no one right answer for everyone, becoming familiar with your credit is always the first step, and paying your bills on time is a must.

For those of you thinking about another dog to help with your first, please take time to look at all of the above reasons why that might not be the right answer, at least at this time.

My question is I had 3 Amex CC two of them almost a year old the third one about 5 months old, when I» be applied for the first time I did it over the phone and before I continued with the application I told the agent that I filed for BK about 6 years ago and I never had a Amex CC then she told me that there are customers that applied with BK and been approved, when she said that I felt confident applying for it and she was right, Amex approved me with a nice credit line of $ 11,000 I was in shock, now explain this a year later I went to the website and I request a credit line increase and I was dinied I called for a recon and they told me I was dinied because in my credit report shows a BK so I said wait a minute when I had applied for that credit card I had approved with no problem and now I can't have a credit line increase and the agent told me there are different factors between applying for credit card and applying for credit increase so that was his answer but he didn't explain the factor why??? Do you have an idea why is the differents Thank you

My first time through the game I did pretty badly, but the second time I won (if you play the one - player version you have to win more than a certain amount of money that your counterpart won earlier while answering the same questions; you can also play against each other or in teams), so the mix of questions is hard enough that you won't get all of them right but easy enough that you won't feel like you're watching Jeopardy.

Thank you for taking the time to answer our questions as swiftly as you did (no joke, Alex was the first to actually email his answers back, but we wanted to hold off sharing his interview until the time was right!)

She is the co-author of Nolo's Essential Guide to Buying Your First Home, Every Landlord's Legal Guide, First - Time Landlord, Every Tenant's Legal Guide, Leases and Rental Agreements, Renters» Rights, and The Legal Answer Book for Families.

It's a no - brainer, and something you've been told time and time again, but making sure you read the question correctly is the first step in getting the answer right!

Even if it's their first time handling a specific type of project and you have dozens of them under your belt, that's no excuse to assume they have no idea what they're doing and you have the right answers.

If you have a question about a claim, make sure it gets answered correctly and promptly, so that all your claims all go out the right way the first time!

As first time home buyers he answered all of our questions, and typed up a report right there at the end of the inspection.