As such, it searches for further
answers than a philosophy of concrescence and self - determination can give.
Not exact matches
â $ œDonâ $ ™ t let others spoil your faith and joy with their
philosophy, wrong and shallow
answers based on manâ $ ™ s thoughts and ideas rather
than what Christ has taughtâ $ (Col. 2:8)
science and
philosophy have
answered more of my questions
than religion ever could.
But there began a period of craving to understand the meaning of life, and since
philosophy did not seem to offer the ultimate
answers to such a quest, I finally decided to probe the Christian tradition more seriously
than I had considered worthwhile before.
Rorty's
answer is somewhat glib: «The reason I like Hirsch's book better
than Bloom's is that it mostly stays away from
philosophy and instead asks what concrete institutional factors are responsible for the prevailing cultural illiteracy.
In
philosophy it is often more important to ask the right question
than to give the right
answer, for questions may make false assumptions.
That's the thing: when it comes to food
philosophy and health, we tend to follow fads, labels and diets, but in reality, there's nothing more powerful
than turning inside for
answers.
During the years of studying Merleau - Ponty's
philosophy I have realized that his indirect ontology, operating via ongoing questioning rather
than providing
answers, is related to Reinhardt's approach to art, applying questions and negation, not in an antagonistic or nihilistic way (as it was perceived by many artists and critics of his time), but rather in a thought - provoking and challenging manner.