Sentences with phrase «answers under oath»

The defendant knows if he / she has or has not so the only available answers under oath are «yes» or «no» - the jury knows this too so any other answer will be seen as disingenuous.

Since you have sworn to tell the truth, you are giving answers under oath, and your answers will be recorded.

«Questions about the payment and the circumstances behind it must be answered, and they must be answered under oath,» he said.

Questions about the payment and the circumstances behind it must be answered, and they must be answered under oath.

The first step will be written interrogatories that she will have to answer under oath.

If you forced me to answer under oath, I'd probably select the Stormy Daniels «Update» segment as the «better» one, whatever «better» means in the subjective world of sketch comedy.

You must answer under oath the trustee's questions about any information in your filing or provide any additional information the trustee requests.

So if there's a civil trial Gleick will have to take the stand and answer under oath everything he knows about the source of the forgery.

Discovery can take four forms: written interrogatories (questions which must be answered under oath); document production; requests for admissions (asking the other party to admit certain facts); and depositions (formally transcribed and sworn statements taken in front of a court reporter or other court officer).

Typically, the first step of the discovery process is the interrogatory phase, in which both sides send written questions to the other party to answer under oath.

Each side may send the other lengthy lists of questions called «interrogatories,» which have been drafted by the family lawyers and which must be answered under oath.

Methods include interrogatories — a written list of questions each spouse must answer under oath — or demands for paperwork, such as statements for bank accounts, retirement funds, investment funds or even just monthly bills to establish each spouse's budget.

Both interrogatories and depositions involve questions spouses must answer under oath.

Attorneys in traditional litigated cases tend to draft questions to be answered under oath, set depositions, conduct research to not only put their client in the best possible light but to put the opposing party in the worst possible light, and prepare for trial.

But during discovery, a process wherein each spouse is given a list of questions to answer under oath, and during the back and forth between spouses as he tries to understand the complaints, he sees clearly the role porn plays in crumbling marriages.

Not exact matches

While Zuckerberg will not be under oath, he will still be required to answer truthfully, as lying to Congress is a federal crime.

Daniels and Avenatti look to be cleanly executing a strategy that has the potential to see Donald Trump hauled into court and required to answer questions about his sexual conduct and campaign finances under oath.

By suing, she potentially has the power to require Donald «grab» em by the pussy» Trump to answer questions about his sexual conduct under oath, whether he committed campaign finance violations, and to focus attention on whether Trump has used non-disclosure agreements to cover - up his sexual conduct.

It's a little too late for praying, it's Mrs.Clinton's call to be @ the helm; now, with her hubby Mr.Clinton as VP; and one of you out of all of you, need to tell Romney he's committed fraud, for leaving the Post of so - called gov.that theirs a 2 yr.interval that must be met; the same fo Obama; whom is worst off then Bush Jr.then for none of you to have no Allegiance to be nothing but commander of thieves, since April 4th, 1968 to presently; in the killing of Dr.King Jr.must still go under Oath to all you perjurers; that mustn't go unpunished to the array of charges I have stored up against each of yo on every job, on every public premise; that Obama didn't praywhen he lied to GOD ALMIGHTY in perjury; to have left the seat of sen.to jump to the office; knowing he hadn't a clue what to do; so he got Joe, which is Cheney all over; whom should of been out of public; and he knows that and all the fugitives, even in the Italian led court in DC; that will have to answer to what is -LCB- H.R. 7152 -RCB-; and why they let Olsen for Bush Jr.waste the American's People's time, not to mention all the lives that's been lost; for the tyrannies since 1968 to presently has cost; Vote I, Edward Baltimore; to confirm I; Governor of DC; as of 2/16/12; cause DC; has been a State, already; and all you slaves from State to State; need to snap out of your peonage which is prohibited by Federal Laws; on anybody!!!!!!!

Key players in the Dick Smith drama will face a public grilling later this year and be compelled to answer questions under oath.

Weiss was put up to speak on the behalf of FSG after the club's principal owner John W. Henry refused to answer questions under oath.

President Clinton was placed under oath to answer questions about oral.

Chances are that Bharara will want more complete answers, whether written or under oath.

Under oath, you will recount your version of events as well as answer any questions from the plaintiff's lawyer.

In the meeting, you will have to answer inquiries about your finances and fill out bankruptcy forms from a trustee and some creditors, under oath.

You may also be required to go to the Official Receiver's office to answer several questions under oath about your financial affairs.

It is you who is under oath and must answer the questions.

Here is Pat Michaels giving testimonials «under oath» (to coin it in auditing parlance), promising to come back and answer «pointed» questions and then forgetting about it:

I'm an attorney and I'm pretty confident that if I could get Gavin Schmidt or James Hansen «in the box,» i.e. in a position where I could question them under oath with no opportunity to dodge, evade, or refuse to answer, I could completely humiliate them and demolish their positions.

While each party is questioned by the other party's lawyer, and the answers are given under oath, examination for discovery is not in itself a trial.

Turning to the model of the securities laws, AS writes that the answer may be full disclosure, or what AS calls the «10b - 5 Oath» (named after the securites regulation that prohibits making any untrue statement or omitting to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading).

I can also spend some time cross examining that witness on his or her understanding of what verification requires and on the concept of perjury (by answering interrogatories «under oath» the witness becomes subject to perjury if the answers are both material and knowingly false).

That way if the witness attempts to shift blame to his or her attorney, I can pull out the verification and show that the witness is being even more evasive by attempting the shift blame to the attorney for answers that witness verified under oath.

Before I became aware of the under oath requirement for interrogatory answers — and therefore typically received and accepted answers that were not under oath — a response to such cross examination questions regarding interrogatory answers would be met with «those are my attorney's answers, not mine,» or even «those are my attorney's answers; I never saw them,» the inference being that the opposing party had no responsibility for these answers.

The under oath requirement of interrogatory responses gives such false or ridiculous answers added weight.

Honest answers are imperative; you'll be under oath.

If you won't agree to that, I'll consent to being examined under oath and answer the questions posed.

This answer claims that you are required to correct an accidental false statement made under oath: When you become aware that a statement made under oath was false (assuming such a statement was...

And at the same time the state may not compel a defendant to testify or, indeed, (this cases aside) answer questions whether or not under oath.

For this reason, it is important for a victim to know the nature of the questions that will be asked of them, under oath, so they can answer them in an informed and honest manner.

going through the discovery process such as being questioned under oath at a deposition or answering interrogatories,

During discovery, you'll also be required to answer the other side's questions under oath.

Usually, the family lawyers will sift through the interrogatory answers and documents, then question the spouses in person while they are under oath, at what is called a «deposition».

They will have to answer questions while under oath, making obscuring or hiding information a serious offense.

This answer claims that you are required to correct an accidental false statement made under oath:

The debtor is required to attend court under oath, to answer pre-arranged questions by the court officer.

An «interrogatory» is simply a question or request for information that must be answered in writing and under oath (i.e., it must be notarized).

No matter how your spouse responds, your divorce is not final until you appear before the judge to state, under oath, that your marriage is irretrievably broken and answer questions the judge may have.

Discovery usually involves written questions or demands for documents, and spouses can require potential witnesses to formally answer questions under oath in a deposition.

At the deposition in the lawyer's office, the therapist will have to answer questions under oath.