Sentences with phrase «anthropogenic global»

Encourage you to address the uncertainties in the issues, not make blanket statements implying catastrophic anthropogenic global warming in the guise of «climate change».

this represents a serious potential threat to humanity and our environment from anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the range of 1.8 °C to 6.4 °C by the end of this century with increase in global sea level of up to 0.59 meters [AR4 WGI SPM, p. 13]

Theoildrum.com is focusing on peak oil — not on the critical issues of how IPCC's has formulated / supported «catastrophic anthropogenic global warming».

If they can not provide a verifiable experiment regarding the present amount of CO2 in the atmosphere and how it effects the climate and creates their anthropogenic global warming, then believing that it does so is akin to believing that Santa Clause is real and you need to be good to get something left under the tree.

Catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW) is the late 20th century version that is distorting scientific funding, hiring, peer review, and then government energy policy.

The new report — the first of three comprehensive studies to come out this year — makes one of the strongest claims yet in support of the hypothesis that human activity, namely the relentless pumping of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, is what's behind climate change — an effect climate scientists refer to as anthropogenic global warming.

The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Angliaâ $ ™ s Climate Research Unit (aka -LSB-...]

Will we need all the anthropogenic global warming we can get to alleviate future periods of global cooling?

Years ago Richard Lindzen said consensus was reached about the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) hypothesis before the research began.

And how much longer will it be before the public finally rejects the bureaucrat - science quacks and political / institutional / celebrity elites who continue to push the failed CO2 - based anthropogenic global warming (AGW) hypothesis, whose real political agenda is not science related whatsoever.

Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) is the hypothesis being slain by an ugly fact.

A paper by John Cook and colleagues published in May 2013 claimed that of the 4,000 peer - reviewed papers they surveyed expressing a position on anthropogenic global warming, «97.1 % endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming».

Thomas Huxley Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) is the hypothesis being slain by an ugly fact.

-- > a coming Ice Age — > global warming — > anthropogenic global warming — > runaway global warming — > climate change — > disastrous climate change — > a «warming hiatus» (currently)-- > irreversible and catastrophic climate changes (the future)

My article on «Greenhouse Confusion» drew vigorous comments from those who believe firmly that anthropogenic global warming (or rather climate...

However, claiming an overwhelming scientific justification for the Plan based upon anthropogenic global warming does a disservice both to climate science and to the policy process.

This will likely cause consequent human suffering greater than that posited by anthropogenic global warming.

Thus the conclusion of «consistency» is not supportable and accordingly does not validate model - derived projections of dangerous anthropogenic global warming.»

Trenberth has the burden to prove that: Anthropogenic global warming cause greater suffering and loss than during nature driven global warming than global cooling periods.

Proponents of the IPCC and their anthropogenic global warming (AGW) hypothesis continue their crusade (pun intended) by inveigling the support of authority figures, like the Pope and by inference, associated groups.

Others show how the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) science was conjured.

The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Angliaâ $ ™ s Climate Research Unit (aka Hadley CRU) and released 61 megabites of confidential files onto the internet.

There are many interesting comments from proponents of human caused climate change (AGW or anthropogenic global warming) and from sceptics which show an astonishing range of differing interpretations and understandings of the so called Greenhouse Effect none of which bear much relation to the actuality.

I've been saying for a very long time that Anthropogenic Global Warming is the new world religion, as it -LSB-...]

Since the source of anthropogenic global warming is ostensibly increasing concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, it makes no sense to posit that over time the oceans will warm at a faster rate than the atmosphere above them.

The stratosphere is cooling as predicted by anthropogenic global warming theory (this can not be explained by solar variability) 4.

Understandably, the Anthropogenic Global Warming Disasterism cultists are getting desperate.

Those who accept the consensus that the Earth is warming due to human activity (anthropogenic global warming or AGW) point to declining Arctic sea ice as one line of evidence to support this conclusion.

«Cap and trade» or a «carbon tax» to mitigate catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW)(aka «climate change») is the biggest hole in the ground ever conceived in which to bury our wealth and starve the poor.

But in the concluding remark Bob you say: «When the two GISS LOTI datasets were again combined, we had removed approximately 85 % of what some consider to be the «anthropogenic global warming signal.»

My sarcasm is driven by cynicism because the AG's actions are a sure sign of the failure of proponents of anthropogenic global warming (AGW).

One might first note, as The New American has reported before, that «consensus» itself is often manipulated, a good example being the debunked claim that «97 percent of scientists affirm anthropogenic global warming.»

Around one third (4,000) of these staked out a position on anthropogenic global warming.

Rapid spread and lack of understanding of the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) theory occurred because it quickly became part of school curricula.

1) If the anthropogenic global warming theory was entirely dependent on CO2 emissions and 2) if you only read the title of Singer's press release, your statement that he's misrepresenting the studies findings would be true.

Importantly, anthropogenic global warming (AGW) doesn't make the Sun brighter.

«there is no such thing as global terrorism», or that «there is no such thing as global warming» is to fail to take issue with the idea that evidence of global terrorism or anthropogenic global warming is sufficient argument for the execution of the «War on Terror», or for «drastic action'to mitigate climate change.

``... there is no convincing evidence that anthropogenic global warming (AGW) will produce catastrophic climate changes.»

Yet journalists will attribute any phenomenon to anthropogenic global warming if it's an opportunity to etch the political messages of environmentalism into our minds, even if it flatly contradicts what they told us yesterday.

The point is that to argue that «there is no such thing as global terrorism», or that «there is no such thing as global warming» is to fail to take issue with the idea that evidence of global terrorism or anthropogenic global warming is sufficient argument for the execution of the «War on Terror», or for «drastic action'to mitigate climate change.

• Where's the motivation in proving anthropogenic global warming wrong?

So, if «all else» is not materially affected, theory has it that Katrina say was made 5 % stronger or so, but «all else» may also mean that actually anthropogenic global warming has made it say 15 % stronger or 5 % weaker.

A 2013 paper, «Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature,» examined «11,944 climate abstracts from 1991 — 2011» and found that «97.1 percent endorsed the consensus position,» while a parallel self - rating survey found that «97.2 percent endorsed the consensus.»

In January of this year, author Kenneth Richard conducted a broad survey of climate change literature for 2017 and found that the alleged «consensus» behind the dangers of anthropogenic global warming is not nearly as settled among climate scientists as people imagine.

Today, I'll illustrate how Keating's subsequent diatribe against me is little more than a microcosm of the larger problem plaguing the political side of the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) issue.

The ever changing hypothesis of anthropogenic global warm....

Note that the AMO index is defined solely on temperatures, so anthropogenic global warming can increase the AMO index.

I've kept the alert ever since, because it provides a daily dose of largely pro-AGW (anthropogenic global warming) material.

I'll also point out that the fundamental piece in the theory of anthropogenic global warming is simply the theory of the greenhouse effect (GHE).

My article on «Greenhouse Confusion» drew vigorous comments from those who believe firmly that anthropogenic global warming (or rather climate change) is a real and immediate threat.