Sentences with phrase «anthropogenic impact on climate»

In my mind, I continue to be baffled by the AGW mainstream's position when Pielke Sr.'s position (i.e., Yes, there is significant anthropogenic impact on climate, but it is due to more than just GHG) intuitively makes so much sense.

Scientific groups have issued numerous statements supporting the consensus, and numerous surveys (including one released this week) continue to show that over 95 percent of those working in the field see evidence of an anthropogenic impact on climate.

However, model complexity is necessary to quantify the anthropogenic impact on climate via the aerosol direct and indirect effects.

However the anthropogenic impact on the climate is regarded as most important driver of the climate warming in 20th century -LSB-...].

Its main goal is to stabilize hothouse emissions in the air at the level that would pose no danger of anthropogenic impact on the climate.

We know, for example, from the work of Santer et al. that the warming trend in the tropical Atlantic can not be explained without anthropogenic impacts on the climate.

[Response: Not all of the papers criticized by us in this piece express skepticism regarding anthropogenic impacts on climate (e.g. the Fan et al paper).

[Response: There is evidence that the enhanced continental winter warming in the Northern Hemisphere, which has resulted at least in part from a recent trend towards the positive phase of the Arctic Oscillation (AO), may in fact also represent a response to anthropogenic impacts on climate.

In conclusion, we have shown that the effect of natural oscillations is critical for proper assessment of anthropogenic impacts on the climate system.

«Lately, along with mitigation of anthropogenic impacts on the climate system by reducing emissions of greenhouse gases, the world community places increasing emphasis on the economy and public adaptation to adverse effects of climate change, including analysis and prediction of emerging challenges and threats.»

Not exact matches

To inform its Earth system models, the climate modeling community has a long history of using integrated assessment models — frameworks for describing humanity's impact on Earth, including the source of global greenhouse gases, land use and land cover change, and other resource - related drivers of anthropogenic climate change.

More work needs to be done to quantify the impact of anthropogenic soluble iron on ocean ecosystems and climate.»

[Response: You may also be interested in the article by Richard Feely and colleagues, Impact of Anthropogenic CO2 on the CaCO3 System in the Oceans arguing that quite apart from any climate impact from atmospheric CO2, there is a much more direct impact from the dissolution of CO2 in the world's oImpact of Anthropogenic CO2 on the CaCO3 System in the Oceans arguing that quite apart from any climate impact from atmospheric CO2, there is a much more direct impact from the dissolution of CO2 in the world's oimpact from atmospheric CO2, there is a much more direct impact from the dissolution of CO2 in the world's oimpact from the dissolution of CO2 in the world's oceans.

Moreover, Shindell et al. found that anthropogenic ozone depletion (via chlorofluorocarbon emissions) may have reduced the impact of UV variability on the climate, and may have even offset it entirely.

Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests.

I am a marine biologist and fish ecologist, with particular interests in bioacoustics (including impacts of anthropogenic noise on marine ecosystems), fish behaviour, effects of climate change on marine fisheries, and innovative management approaches.

Anthropogenic climate change is expected to have an impact on these types of events: warm temperature extremes and heavy precipitation extremes have -LSB-...]

[Response: You may also be interested in the article by Richard Feely and colleagues, Impact of Anthropogenic CO2 on the CaCO3 System in the Oceans arguing that quite apart from any climate impact from atmospheric CO2, there is a much more direct impact from the dissolution of CO2 in the world's oImpact of Anthropogenic CO2 on the CaCO3 System in the Oceans arguing that quite apart from any climate impact from atmospheric CO2, there is a much more direct impact from the dissolution of CO2 in the world's oimpact from atmospheric CO2, there is a much more direct impact from the dissolution of CO2 in the world's oimpact from the dissolution of CO2 in the world's oceans.

Our findings support a previous study suggesting that the impact of anthropogenic climate warming on Arctic sea ice became detectable from the early 1990s onwards (19).

Perhaps some on this site are eagerly, impatiently, and prematurely anticipating the eventual emergence of a * real * CLIMATE signal that heralds an unquestioned anthropogenic impact on *** climaCLIMATE signal that heralds an unquestioned anthropogenic impact on *** climateclimate ***.

«The climatic forcings resulting from such solar — terrestrial links may have had a significant impact on climate prior to the onset of anthropogenic warming».

Thomas Lee Elifritz (# 70), you quote the authors: «The climatic forcings resulting from such solar — terrestrial links may have had a significant impact on climate prior to the onset of anthropogenic warming».

Carefully qualified statements on the probability that climate change is real and anthropogenic, along with possible potential impacts — also carefully qualified and filled with jargon — are lost on the general public, who would find even the simplified approach of RealClimate overwhelming.

These results, while confirming that anthropogenic - added climate forcing might have progressively played a dominant role in climate change during the last century, also suggested that the solar impact on climate change during the same period is signficantly stronger than what some theoretical models have predicted.»

In essence Tung & Zhou are dining at the denialist's last - chance saloon by invoking a 60 - year natural cycle (their cycle of choice being AMO) resulting in a reduced anthropogenic influence on climate, although they make sure to not directly challenge climate sensitivity by asserting that their findings will impact on assessment of net anthropogenic forcing and leave climate sensitivity estimates unchallenged.

The consensus in climate science is that recent climate change is overwhelmingly identified as anthropogenic in cause, and furthermore (as per AAR5 on Impacts) there is a consensus that climate change will have significant impacts that while a value judgement can quite reasonably be described as «dangerous&Impacts) there is a consensus that climate change will have significant impacts that while a value judgement can quite reasonably be described as «dangerous&impacts that while a value judgement can quite reasonably be described as «dangerous».

The first is climate inertia — on very many levels, from fossil lock - in emissions (decades), ocean - atmospheric temperature inertia (yet more decades), Earth system temperature inertia (centuries to millennia) to ecological climate impact inertia (impacts becoming worse over time under a constant stress)-- all this to illustrate anthropogenic climate change, although already manifesting itself, is still very much an escalating problem for the future.

Let me know when you can acknowledge the scientific on the impact of CO2 - induced, anthropogenic climate change.

When this is done, the results tell the full story of the on - going consistent impacts of anthropogenic climate change.

More Scientific Evidence For CO2's Dubious Climate Impact Emerges Image Source: Robertson and Chilingar, 2017 According to the most basic precepts of anthropogenic global warming (AGW), variations in CO2 concentrations exert significant control on sea surface temperatures, glaciers, sea levels, and generalized climate dynamics (i.e., precipitation patClimate Impact Emerges Image Source: Robertson and Chilingar, 2017 According to the most basic precepts of anthropogenic global warming (AGW), variations in CO2 concentrations exert significant control on sea surface temperatures, glaciers, sea levels, and generalized climate dynamics (i.e., precipitation patclimate dynamics (i.e., precipitation patterns).

Observational records show that anthropogenic - influenced climate change has already had a profound impact on global and U.S. warm season climate over the past 30 years, and there is increasing contrast between geographic regions that are climatologically wet and dry - the hypothesis that the «wet gets wetter, dry gets drier» is seen in a new paper by Chang et al..

The British medical journal The Lancet, known for its tobacco Prohibitionist and anti-Israel views, created a commission on Health and Climate Change to promote, as if it were science, the view that «to avoid the risk of potentially catastrophic climate change impacts requires total anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to be kept below 2900 billion tonnes by the end of the century» — not a calculation that physicians, biologists, and the like are particularly qualified toClimate Change to promote, as if it were science, the view that «to avoid the risk of potentially catastrophic climate change impacts requires total anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to be kept below 2900 billion tonnes by the end of the century» — not a calculation that physicians, biologists, and the like are particularly qualified toclimate change impacts requires total anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to be kept below 2900 billion tonnes by the end of the century» — not a calculation that physicians, biologists, and the like are particularly qualified to make.)

The impacts of climate change and sea level rise tend to be intensified by direct anthropogenic modifications (e.g. river control structures, coastal embankments, and upstream reservoirs) on the delta plain.

The impact of anthropogenic land use and land cover change on regional climate extremes.

Therefore, it can be concluded that anthropogenic climate change so far has not had a significant impact on losses from natural disasters.

The relative magnitudes of the climate impacts induced by the naturally - occurring NAO and by anthropogenic factors will depend on the time horizon (e.g., next few decades vs. end of the twenty - first century), time - scale (interannual vs. multi-decadal), and parameter (temperature vs. precipitation) of interest (e.g., Deser et al. 2012).

Posmentier, 2001: The impact of anthropogenic CO2 emission on climate: unresolved Problems (in Russian), Proceedings of the Russian Geographical Society 133 (1).

Of course this is totally dependent on how «better» is measured, but there is one fundamental, over-riding sense in which I think it isn't better - that we are likely facing potentially catastrophic impacts from anthropogenic climate change and we have little prospect of averting that within timescales that would make a significant difference.

It appears that the message from the AGW believers regarding solar impact on our climate is slowly shifting from «it is insignificant, limited to the measurable direct impact from changes in solar irradiation» to «well, it could be a cause of natural variation but is still much less significant than anthropogenic factors (i.e. CO2)»

Once this is done, it is found that solar impact on climate is severely underestimated by the traditional models by a large factor while that the anthropogenic component has been overestimated by at least 2 - 3 times.

So the argument we made was, since Paris is voluntary, we had already agreed under the Framework Convention on Climate Change (which we're a party to), that we would reduce our emissions to a level that wouldn't cause dangerous anthropogenic impacts.

These results suggest that there is a strong impact of anthropogenic climate change on growing season length.

Systems: In recent decades, changes in climate (including both anthropogenic and natural changes) have caused impacts on natural and human systems on all continents and oceans.

The red line shows climate model simulations of global surface temperature change produced using the sum of the impacts on temperature from natural (b, c, d) and anthropogenic factors (e).

The first step in being truly objective is to openly acknowledge the large degree of uncertainty which exists today on the relative importance of natural and anthropogenic climate forcing components and, hence, on the validity of any long - term projections of future impact of anthropogenic factors.

The term «enforcers of the climate consensus» is a bitter and resentful way to refer to competent and productive climate scientists, in particular those who care enough about the current and future impact of anthropogenic climate change on Earth's ecosystems and on humanity.

By incorporating a range of volcanic futures into a coupled model, it is shown that volcanic forcing has quantifiable impacts on the time at which anthropogenic signatures emerge across various climate metrics.

For in order to gauge the possible impacts of anthropogenic greenhouse gases on the present or future climate, we must first know the natural variations on which our own activities are imposed.

Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, developed and developing countries collaborate and come together to mitigate and adapt to climate impacts resulting from anthropogenic greenhouse gas emiClimate Change, developed and developing countries collaborate and come together to mitigate and adapt to climate impacts resulting from anthropogenic greenhouse gas emiclimate impacts resulting from anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions.

Furthermore, this variability is not adequately simulated in the current generation of coupled climate models used to study the impact of anthropogenic influences on climate [Gregory et al., 2004; Barnett et al. 2005; Church et al. 2005; and Hansen et al., 2005].