Sentences with phrase «anthropogenic warming ends»

Not exact matches

If so, I presume this article means that it could happen again in response to anthropogenic warming but not in the small number of years that some fear — i.e. it would take thousands of years, and we won't all be cooked to extinction by the end of the decade.

3) Lack of evidence that the changes being seen are not long - standing, being largely due to the inundation of the ESAS after the end of the last glacial rather than due to recent anthropogenic warming.

this represents a serious potential threat to humanity and our environment from anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the range of 1.8 °C to 6.4 °C by the end of this century with increase in global sea level of up to 0.59 meters [AR4 WGI SPM, p. 13]

My biggest problem with the CET as an indicator of anthropogenic warming is the start and end points.

So now volcanoes decide... Even if Asia will reduce «anthropogenic influences» of sulfur aerosols, nothing we gain... We can not «hope» that abruptly we have a «volcanic silence» and anthropogenic GHGs «will triumph»... An aerosol «the end» of global warming?

But, there's always the possibility that we'll end up with it only producing new ways for some of the participants to provide another faux report with faux information, provided by faux science in an effort to keep the pressure on that anthropogenic global warming is real.

I guess in the end it doesn't really matter, as I believe we are getting warmer and I'm willing to accept that anthropogenic causes can be a significant factor.

Atmospheric surface temps have been used and marketed since the end of the last global cooling phase from 1945 - 1976 and explicitly through the 1990 ′ s as the definitive measure of «theorised» human - induced (anthropogenic) global warming.

«The author has added an update at the end showing why it CAN BE REASONABLY ARGUED that anthropogenic greenhouse gases MAY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR less than half of the observed warming since the mid-20th century»

Interestingly, Penner et al. find that whether the climate sensitivity parameter is on the low or high end, reducing anthropogenic emissions of the short - lived warming pollutants would achieve a significant reduction in global warming over the next 50 - 100 years.

A problem that arises in the context of attributing any effect to CO2 is that since the end of the Little Ice Age, a natural warming has possibly increased the temperature monotonically, anthropogenic CO2 has increased monotonically, and deforestation and urbanization have increased monotonically.

[Editor note: The author has added an update at the end showing why it can be reasonably argued that anthropogenic greenhouse gases may be responsible for less than half of the observed warming since the mid-20th century]

And that's the way the anthropogenic global warming fantasy ends.

First, we note that the record can be divided into three eras, consisting two perturbed climates — the rapid warming after the end of LIA and the modern period of anthropogenic warming after the Second Industrial Revolution — separated by a background climate when Europe experienced a century (1738 — 1849) of mild temperature with no trend.

It would be great if anthropogenic CO2 could end the ice age but I sincerely doubt whether we can pump it up enough to warm that huge bucket of nearly freezing water called the global ocean.

The 800 - year lag between the beginnings of temperature increase and CO2 rise in the polar ice record is because the initial warming that provoked the end of the ice ages was caused by changes in the Earth's alignment and orbit around the sun; not anthropogenic CO2.

This temperature decrease is much smaller than the warming expected from anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions by the end of the century.

Anthropogenic warming by the end of the 21st century will likely cause tropical cyclones globally to be more intense on average (by 2 to 11 % according to model projections for an IPCC mid-range scenario).

Anthropogenic warming has interrupted the Glacial - Interglacial cycle of the Quaternary (Ganopolski et al., 2016; Haqq - Misra, 2014) and there will be no coming Ice - Age n - 1000 years from now to reseal all of this volatile Carbon, as happened at the end of each previous interglacial.