Our results show significant
anthropogenic warming trends in all the continental regions analyzed.
See: New paper cuts recent
anthropogenic warming trend in half (h / t WUWT)
Not exact matches
But the period of time over which the team analysed the long - term
trend in warming was the past 50 years,
in which this oscillation hasn't changed significantly — so almost all the
warming looks to have been the result of
anthropogenic climate change.
Nonetheless, even if the substantial recent
trend in the AO pattern is simply a product of natural multidecadal variability
in North Atlantic climate, it underscores the fact that western and southern Greenland is an extremely poor place to look, from a signal vs. noise point of view, for the large - scale polar amplification signature of
anthropogenic surface
warming.
Our general circulation model simulations, which take into account the recently observed widespread occurrence of vertically extended atmospheric brown clouds over the Indian Ocean and Asia3, suggest that atmospheric brown clouds contribute as much as the recent increase
in anthropogenic greenhouse gases to regional lower atmospheric
warming trends.
For example, the borehole data show
warming since about 1500 AD which clearly was not
anthropogenic, and
in the latest decade, since the very
warm 1998, the temperature
trend is downward even
in the Hadley Center compilations; the most ardent supporters of
anthropogenic global
warming.
We know, for example, from the work of Santer et al. that the
warming trend in the tropical Atlantic can not be explained without
anthropogenic impacts on the climate.
Basically, all of the
warming trend in the last ~ 60 yrs is
anthropogenic»
If only half the
warming over 1976 - 2000 (linear
trend 0.18 °C / decade) was indeed
anthropogenic, and the IPCC AR5 best estimate of the change
in anthropogenic forcing over that period (linear
trend 0.33Wm - 2 / decade) is accurate, then the transient climate response (TCR) would be little over 1 °C.
Basically, all of the
warming trend in the last ~ 60 yrs is
anthropogenic (a combination of greenhouse gases, aerosols, land use change, ozone etc.).
Given that the
trend in global SSTs has been attributed to increases
in greenhouse gases
in the atmosphere (17 — 19), it follows that the best explanation for this ecosystem aberration is
anthropogenic warming that has passed a threshold of natural variability.
Nonetheless, even if the substantial recent
trend in the AO pattern is simply a product of natural multidecadal variability
in North Atlantic climate, it underscores the fact that western and southern Greenland is an extremely poor place to look, from a signal vs. noise point of view, for the large - scale polar amplification signature of
anthropogenic surface
warming.
In the remainder, such increases were mostly unrelated to
warming or drying
trends and therefore may be due to other climate effects not explored (e.g. lightning ignitions) or possible
anthropogenic influences.
Unlike a belief
in leprechauns, there is a preponderance of evidence that CO2
warms the planet and that the
anthropogenic contribution of CO2 to the atmosphere is causing the observed
warming trend.
Mooney describes the debate over the role of natural vs.
anthropogenic factors
in observed tropical
warming trends that have been related to increased hurricane activity, and there is a fair amount of discussion of the partisanship that high - level NOAA administrators have apparently taken
in this debate.
In particular, would anyone question that the observed trends in sea surface temperature in all basins can be attributed to anthropogenic global warmin
In particular, would anyone question that the observed
trends in sea surface temperature in all basins can be attributed to anthropogenic global warmin
in sea surface temperature
in all basins can be attributed to anthropogenic global warmin
in all basins can be attributed to
anthropogenic global
warming?
[Response: There is evidence that the enhanced continental winter
warming in the Northern Hemisphere, which has resulted at least
in part from a recent
trend towards the positive phase of the Arctic Oscillation (AO), may
in fact also represent a response to
anthropogenic impacts on climate.
In these, despite the various minor ups and downs, the general
trend is down until about 1850 CE when
anthropogenic effects really started lifting the temperature, following the excess global
warming (so - called greenhouse) gases.
Anthropogenic global
warming (AGW), a recent
warming of the Earth's lower atmosphere as evidenced by the global mean temperature anomaly
trend [11], is BELIEVED to be the result of an «enhanced greenhouse effect» mainly due to human - produced increased concentrations of greenhouse gases
in the atmosphere [12] and changes
in the use of land [13].
Tung and Zhou repeat the analysis of Foster and Rahmstorf 2011 (PDF)
in Figure 5 while also removing the AMO, and obtain an
anthropogenic warming trend over the last 33 years of 0.07 °C / decade, less than half of Foster and Rahmstorf's 0.17 °C / decade.
However, Helbig et al. [2017], using a set of nested paired eddy covariance flux towers
in a boreal forest - wetland landscape, point to the increasing importance of
warming temperatures on ecosystem respiration potentially overwhelming enhanced productivity occurring from land cover change under projected
anthropogenic trends.
Our general circulation model simulations, which take into account the recently observed widespread occurrence of vertically extended atmospheric brown clouds over the Indian Ocean and Asia, suggest that atmospheric brown clouds contribute as much as the recent increase
in anthropogenic greenhouse gases to regional lower atmospheric
warming trends.
This finding, though based on uncertain reconstructions of past ENSO behaviour, is entirely independent of previous analyses confined to the restricted instrumental climate record...... such a
trend would seem consistent with the response to the general increase
in explosive volcanism during the fifteenth — nineteenth centuries
in conjunction with reduced solar irradiance that is responsible for the millennial cooling
trend of Northern Hemisphere mean temperature before modern
anthropogenic warming.
In its Summary, the latest IPCC report (2007) states explicitly that this reported (surface)
warming trend is sure (> 90 %) evidence for
anthropogenic global
warming (AGW).
The late 20th century divergence is partly due to local
anthropogenic warming and partly to other factors, such as longterm multicentennial linear
trend in solar cycle frequency (thermal inertia of oceans and ice).
«Estimating changes
in global temperature since the pre-industrial period» «A reassessment of temperature variations and
trends from global reanalyses and monthly surface climatological datasets» «Deducing Multidecadal
Anthropogenic Global
Warming Trends Using Multiple Regression Analysis» «Early onset of industrial - era warming across the oceans and continents
Warming Trends Using Multiple Regression Analysis» «Early onset of industrial - era
warming across the oceans and continents
warming across the oceans and continents»
«We evaluate to what extent the temperature rise
in the past 100 years was a
trend or a natural fluctuation and analyze 2249 worldwide monthly temperature records from GISS (NASA) with the 100 - year period covering 1906 - 2005 and the two 50 - year periods from 1906 to 1955 and 1956 to 2005... The data document a strong urban heat island eff ect (UHI) and a
warming with increasing station elevation... About a quarter of all the records for the 100 - year period show a fall
in temperatures... that the observed temperature records are a combination of long - term correlated records with an additional
trend, which is caused for instance by
anthropogenic CO2, the UHI or other forcings... As a result, the probabilities that the observed temperature series are natural have values roughly between 40 % and 90 %, depending on the stations characteristics and the periods considered.»
Further, the probabilistic approach reveals a picture startling to even most global -
warming pessimists: If we're to avoid precipitating what that U.N. Framework Convention genteelly calls «dangerous
anthropogenic interference,» we're going to have to aim at an atmospheric greenhouse - gas concentration target that, by current
trends, we'll reach
in less than two decades.
Williams et al., 2017 (DOI: 10.1002 / 2017GL073138) «The
warming trend post-1850s
in the SST reconstruction (0.8 ± 0.16 °C, 1s) is consistent with global mean
warming of 0.85 ± 0.21 °C (1s) from 1880 to 2012 (Figure 4b, c), attributed largely to
anthropogenic causes -LSB-...].
The near - linear rate of
anthropogenic warming (predominantly from anthropogenic greenhouse gases) is shown in sources such as: «Deducing Multidecadal Anthropogenic Global Warming Trends Using Multiple Regression Analysis» «The global warming hiatus — a natural product of interactions of a secular warming trend and a multi-decadal oscillation» «The Origin and Limits of the Near Proportionality between Climate Warming and Cumulative CO2 Emissions» «Sensitivity of climate to cumulative carbon emissions due to compensation of ocean heat and carbon uptake» «Return periods of global climate fluctuations and the pause» «Using data to attribute episodes of warming and cooling in instrumental records» «The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions» «The sensitivity of the proportionality between temperature change and cumulative CO2 emissions to ocean
anthropogenic warming (predominantly from anthropogenic greenhouse gases) is shown in sources such as: «Deducing Multidecadal Anthropogenic Global Warming Trends Using Multiple Regression Analysis» «The global warming hiatus — a natural product of interactions of a secular warming trend and a multi-decadal oscillation» «The Origin and Limits of the Near Proportionality between Climate Warming and Cumulative CO2 Emissions» «Sensitivity of climate to cumulative carbon emissions due to compensation of ocean heat and carbon uptake» «Return periods of global climate fluctuations and the pause» «Using data to attribute episodes of warming and cooling in instrumental records» «The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions» «The sensitivity of the proportionality between temperature change and cumulative CO2 emissions to ocean mixing
warming (predominantly from
anthropogenic greenhouse gases) is shown in sources such as: «Deducing Multidecadal Anthropogenic Global Warming Trends Using Multiple Regression Analysis» «The global warming hiatus — a natural product of interactions of a secular warming trend and a multi-decadal oscillation» «The Origin and Limits of the Near Proportionality between Climate Warming and Cumulative CO2 Emissions» «Sensitivity of climate to cumulative carbon emissions due to compensation of ocean heat and carbon uptake» «Return periods of global climate fluctuations and the pause» «Using data to attribute episodes of warming and cooling in instrumental records» «The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions» «The sensitivity of the proportionality between temperature change and cumulative CO2 emissions to ocean
anthropogenic greenhouse gases) is shown
in sources such as: «Deducing Multidecadal
Anthropogenic Global Warming Trends Using Multiple Regression Analysis» «The global warming hiatus — a natural product of interactions of a secular warming trend and a multi-decadal oscillation» «The Origin and Limits of the Near Proportionality between Climate Warming and Cumulative CO2 Emissions» «Sensitivity of climate to cumulative carbon emissions due to compensation of ocean heat and carbon uptake» «Return periods of global climate fluctuations and the pause» «Using data to attribute episodes of warming and cooling in instrumental records» «The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions» «The sensitivity of the proportionality between temperature change and cumulative CO2 emissions to ocean
Anthropogenic Global
Warming Trends Using Multiple Regression Analysis» «The global warming hiatus — a natural product of interactions of a secular warming trend and a multi-decadal oscillation» «The Origin and Limits of the Near Proportionality between Climate Warming and Cumulative CO2 Emissions» «Sensitivity of climate to cumulative carbon emissions due to compensation of ocean heat and carbon uptake» «Return periods of global climate fluctuations and the pause» «Using data to attribute episodes of warming and cooling in instrumental records» «The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions» «The sensitivity of the proportionality between temperature change and cumulative CO2 emissions to ocean mixing
Warming Trends Using Multiple Regression Analysis» «The global
warming hiatus — a natural product of interactions of a secular warming trend and a multi-decadal oscillation» «The Origin and Limits of the Near Proportionality between Climate Warming and Cumulative CO2 Emissions» «Sensitivity of climate to cumulative carbon emissions due to compensation of ocean heat and carbon uptake» «Return periods of global climate fluctuations and the pause» «Using data to attribute episodes of warming and cooling in instrumental records» «The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions» «The sensitivity of the proportionality between temperature change and cumulative CO2 emissions to ocean mixing
warming hiatus — a natural product of interactions of a secular
warming trend and a multi-decadal oscillation» «The Origin and Limits of the Near Proportionality between Climate Warming and Cumulative CO2 Emissions» «Sensitivity of climate to cumulative carbon emissions due to compensation of ocean heat and carbon uptake» «Return periods of global climate fluctuations and the pause» «Using data to attribute episodes of warming and cooling in instrumental records» «The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions» «The sensitivity of the proportionality between temperature change and cumulative CO2 emissions to ocean mixing
warming trend and a multi-decadal oscillation» «The Origin and Limits of the Near Proportionality between Climate
Warming and Cumulative CO2 Emissions» «Sensitivity of climate to cumulative carbon emissions due to compensation of ocean heat and carbon uptake» «Return periods of global climate fluctuations and the pause» «Using data to attribute episodes of warming and cooling in instrumental records» «The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions» «The sensitivity of the proportionality between temperature change and cumulative CO2 emissions to ocean mixing
Warming and Cumulative CO2 Emissions» «Sensitivity of climate to cumulative carbon emissions due to compensation of ocean heat and carbon uptake» «Return periods of global climate fluctuations and the pause» «Using data to attribute episodes of
warming and cooling in instrumental records» «The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions» «The sensitivity of the proportionality between temperature change and cumulative CO2 emissions to ocean mixing
warming and cooling
in instrumental records» «The proportionality of global
warming to cumulative carbon emissions» «The sensitivity of the proportionality between temperature change and cumulative CO2 emissions to ocean mixing
warming to cumulative carbon emissions» «The sensitivity of the proportionality between temperature change and cumulative CO2 emissions to ocean mixing»
The grand mistake of the climate catastrophists was using an instrument network primarily located
in industrialized NH locations and mistaking a natural
warming trend beginning
in the 1970 - 1980 timeframe with
anthropogenic warming.
Anthropogenic global
warming (AGW), a recent
warming of the Earth's lower atmosphere as evidenced by the global mean temperature anomaly
trend [9], is believed to be the result of an «enhanced greenhouse effect» mainly due to human - produced increased concentrations of greenhouse gases
in the atmosphere [10] and changes
in the use of land [11]..
Using data to attribute episodes of
warming and cooling
in instrumental records, Ka - Kit Tung1 and Jiansong Zhou, 12/2012; ``...
anthropogenic global
warming trends might have been overestimated by a factor of two
in the second half of the 20th century.»
It's this final phrase, «superimposed on an
anthropogenic warming trend», that Swanson and Tsonis explore further
in a subsequent research.
In 2009, they continue to examine the coupling of ocean cycles, stressing «caution that the shifts described here are presumably superimposed upon a long term
warming trend due to
anthropogenic forcing» (Swanson & Tsonis 2009).
The distinct lack of any
warming has compromised greatly the ability of climate models to accurately predict short and long - term climate
trends, and
in my opinion goes a long way toward the «critical failure» that falsifies the very hypothesis and foundation of the
anthropogenic global
warming theory.
I do think, however, that it is significant (short term, not a firm
trend) that CO2, as measured at MLO, has been increasing at a smaller rate than
in previous years despite the fact that overall
anthropogenic CO2 output is not decreasing and, furthermore, that the short term
trend of the absolute increase is also down which indicates a greater rate of absorption of CO2 than
in previous years — which to me would indicate an ongoing cooling of the oceans as per the theory that a cooling ocean absorbs more CO2 while a
warming ocean releases more CO2.
The point they make may be summarized by the following quote: «While
in the observations such breaks
in temperature
trend are clearly superimposed upon a century time - scale
warming presumably due to
anthropogenic forcing, those breaks result
in significant departures from that
warming over time periods spanning multiple decades.»
However, comparison of the 2035 event
in the 21st century simulation and the 1910s event
in the observations with this event, suggests an alternative hypothesis, namely that the climate shifted after the 1970s event to a different state of a
warmer climate, which may be superimposed on an
anthropogenic warming trend.
Johnson et al. (2007) estimated that the deep ocean could add an additional 2 - 10 % to the upper ocean heat content
trend, which is likely to grow
in importance as the
anthropogenic warming signal propagates to increasing depth with time.
The Early
Anthropogenic Hypothesis (108) posits that mid-Holocene increases
in CO2 and CH4 resulted from early land clearing and other agricultural practices and that these unprecedented interglacial
trends in atmospheric composition set global climate on a trajectory toward
warmer conditions long before human use of fossil fuels (108, 109).
I would interpret this as a sequence of step functions followed by multiyear declines (when El Nino leftover
warm water pools slowly lose their heat), superseeded by a
warming trend, caused by other natural and
anthropogenic causes, which
in sum just keep the temperature about constant after the step function.
Indeed, our results show that even
in the absence of
trends in mean precipitation — or
trends in the occurrence of extremely low - precipitation events — the risk of severe drought
in California has already increased due to extremely
warm conditions induced by
anthropogenic global
warming.
«The land — sea
warming ratio
in the ECHAM — HadISST holds also for the
warming trend over the most recent decades, despite the fact that no
anthropogenic radiative forcings are included
in the simulations.
e.g., the «very high confidence»
in major
anthropogenic warming is an «argument from ignorance» due to underestimating the
trends and major uncertainties regarding TSI, solar influence, and cloud
trends.
The empirical curve forecast (black curve made of the harmonic component plus the proposed corrected
anthropogenic warming trend) looks
in good agreement with the data up to now.
This
warming is then extended
in the IPCC GCMs» projections for the 21st century with an
anthropogenic warming trend of about 2.3 °C / century, as evident
in the IPCC's figure SPM5 shown below
In fact, it is not possible to directly solving the natural versus the anthropogenic component of the upward warming trend observed in the climate since 1850 (about 0.8 °C) by using the harmonic model calibrated on the same data because with 161 years of data at most a 60 - year cycle can be well detected, but not longer cycle
In fact, it is not possible to directly solving the natural versus the
anthropogenic component of the upward
warming trend observed
in the climate since 1850 (about 0.8 °C) by using the harmonic model calibrated on the same data because with 161 years of data at most a 60 - year cycle can be well detected, but not longer cycle
in the climate since 1850 (about 0.8 °C) by using the harmonic model calibrated on the same data because with 161 years of data at most a 60 - year cycle can be well detected, but not longer cycles.
* «UK rainfall shows large year to year variability, making
trends hard to detect» * «While connections can be made between climate change and dry seasons
in some parts of the world, there is currently no clear evidence of such a link to recent dry periods
in the UK» * «The attribution of these changes to
anthropogenic global
warming requires climate models of sufficient resolution to capture storms and their associated rainfall.»
The removal of the AMO
in the determination of the
anthropogenic warming trend is justified if one accepts our previous argument that this multidecadal variability is mostly natural.