Sentences with phrase «anyone about his evidence»

The messages show he was «not an expert» and ignored directions not to talk to anyone about his evidence, the letter argues.

Not exact matches

Anyone who is serious about being fair needs to look at the whole picture without cherry - picking evidence or pretending that generally accepted principles don't apply to some.

Even if you didn't have those cases, the very evidence that the Attorney General relies on for his advertising claim is that he says DraftKings suggests in its advertising that anyone can win and that's not true because about 1 % of players win a majority of the prizes.

Robert See, I find that anyone who denies what scientific evidence objectively reveals in favour of what they personally think must be correct without any evidence whatsoever must be operating out of the same harmful pride you're talking about.

The Universe is not compelled to provide evidence to support anyone's ideas about it.

The internal evidence of the book of Daniel and what he knows and writes about has been shown to be accurate and could not have been known to anyone unless they were living in Babylon at the time of it's empire.

Victor Lowe, who has written more about this issue than anyone else, insisted from the beginning that a very high standard of evidence ought to be adopted in investigating this question of historical influence.

Anyway, I encourage anyone with serious questions about God seeking evidence for faith in God to visit rzim.com you'll find a wealth of intellectually sustainable reasons for faith in God.

There is no evidence of anyone worrying about spurious belief anywhere in the old testament.

With such a wealth of delicious meat free grub around these days — not to mention the growing body of scientific evidence about the unhealthiness of eating meat — it's a wonder anyone needs convincing.

They will literally believe ANYTHING anyone says about Arsenal even when there is no solid evidence as proof.

Anyone can give the journalists quotes about their vision, his true ambition was evidenced by what he did / didn't do in July.

We were just talking about this, here are the stats or «evidence» if you don't believe your lying eyes or the entirety of anyone that has ever played or watched ball and gotten hot.

All the talk about signing a striker in Jan seems to be only media gossip BUT i think based on some of what wenger has said which is no surprise from past seasons as it appears we will not sign anyone, I hope that's not the case BUT if it is it will be more evidence of real misjudgment by wenger.

But it is difficult to have sympathy with anyone who has bought their line about frugal spending policies over the past 7/8 years, the evidence disproving this has always been available and this site especially has done an excellent job in highlighting it.

I know that once people are dead - set against something, no amount of evidence or coaxing will sway them, but I did want to put this information out there for anyone else who may be on the fence about circumcision.

Anyone who believes the oft repeated claims that homebirth midwifery is about scientific evidence is at best naive, and at worst a fool.

They are also always Trotted out whenever anyone asks a question about the related topic, or whenever someone says / shares something evidence based about that topic.

On the question of how he would be dealing with allegations of corruption against members of his own government, President Akufo - Addo answered, «I have made it publicly known that anyone who has information about acts of corruption against any of my appointees should bring it forward and should be prepared to back it up with evidence.»

I have made it publicly known that anyone, who has information about acts of corruption against any of my appointees, should bring it forward, and should be prepared to back it up with evidence.

You can see photo evidence here: http://www.bodyhack.com/men/six-pack-and-11-5-body-fat-in-12-weeks (sorry that it looks a bit salesy, I'm not trying to promote it, the buying process was shut down about 2 years ago, so I can't make money from it) If anyone would like my diet plan for free I would be happy to help.

The weight of evidence indicates a substantial risk for kidney stones in anyone taking more than about 250 mg.

BTW, as for your statement about their being no evidence that «vegans» live longer than anyone else, I don't advocate «veganism» as such on health grounds.

While I believe the Paleolithic option would be superior in the measure of blood markers and all health related parameters, my personal beliefs count for shit in the face of evidence — and this should hold true for anyone who talks about nutrition.

It feels like a cultural moment, evidenced by the fact that it was all anyone was able to talk about for days after its release.

That said, the evidence is rather overwhelming, and we'd love to hear anyone contest the notion that Red Dead Redemption 2 isn't the game being talked about below.

We also couldn't find any evidence that anyone had ever actually asked kids about the extent to which these strategies work.

EK: We like to think that anyone who cares about evidence - supported education improvement will find something of value.

The real evidence about K12 Inc. and Rocketship Charter Schools is hardly positive, but anyone familiar with the needs of students would recognize the inherent problem with the notion that, «students are supervised by monitors, rather than teachers, saving significantly on costs.»

What drives me crazy about how Yglesias discusses charter schools and education reform, besides his absolute and seemingly unwavering commitment to snarking at anyone who questions reform at all, is that he knows the discouraging empirical evidence regarding education reform but seems never to let that knowledge affect his analysis.

It's been well over a year now and I am still waiting for evidence showing that I complained about a bad review, stalked underage girls, acted inappropriately with anyone, much less with underage girls as you and your friends accuse of.

Anyone who is serious about being fair needs to look at the whole picture without cherry - picking evidence or pretending that generally accepted principles don't apply to some.

While there's still far more unknown than known about this risk, there's no evidence that anyone needs to panic about their pet cats.

So at the ending of the day I don't really believe that anyone needs to prove or give any type of evidence that games many times are not violent because I don't really believe that the argument nearly even needs to be about the violence and games as much as it's about that we already have a rating system for that type of content in the first place.

# 277 Phil Scadden: «I was considering whether I had time or energy to comment, but wondered if anyone knew who Steven Goddard is and what the «policy based evidence making» is about.

This is why I demand anyone who makes big claims about climate science, whether sceptical or catastrophic, show me the evidence.

I was considering whether I had time or energy to comment, but wondered if anyone knew who Steven Goddard is and what the «policy based evidence making» is about.

For sure, the technical rebuttals to the specific claims compete with balance of evidence arguments and a little bit of playful trolling for the attention of anyone who actually cares about the details.

[Re: # 277: I was considering whether I had time or energy to comment, but wondered if anyone knew who Steven Goddard is and what the «policy based evidence making» is about.

I would encourage anyone posting here who thinks efforts to combat AGW have disastrous consequences or are promoted dishonestly to provide evidence entirely disconnected to the feelings any of us might have about the consequences of Nazism.

A good example of this is that, for all of the heat and noise about Science and Nature and IPCC, you have not provided a single bit of evidence that AGW is real, and neither has anyone else on this blog.

There is no evidence that my guess about the state of the world one hundred years from now is any better or worse than anyone else's.

But there is so much unknown about the Antarctic, as evidence by this latest study, how can anyone conclude with such confidence that the basal melt processes from the geothermal activity are not much greater than can be understood at this time.

I do not believe that my reply saying that the fact was only one in Courtney's fantasy, can be really misunderstood by anyone who is clear in his mind, in a way that it referred to his meta statement about what the discussion was about, but not to what Courtney explicitly claimed the fact was, that global warming «stopped», particularly since I also mentioned the missing evidence for it in the same sentence.

These supporting arguments and evidence take Andy Lacis» expressions — for the most part — from mere assertion or claim into the realm of supported and generally accepted knowledge, about which anyone might express the utmost degree of confidence, conventionally.

And then the shrillness of pro-warmist alarm and outright hostility towards anyone who dared voice confusion, if not doubt, about the observational evidence of man's CO2 production being a progressive disaster for the planet, pushed me into the skeptic camp completely.

It is provable, solidly back by much evidence and I have written about it many times on this blog — with sources and references, which anyone is free to check up on by revisiting my archive of posts.

The second thing is I recommend anyone who is concerned about bad science look up the Electrical Universe, which discusses how Modern Astrophysics has ignored any and all evidence that the universe is primarily ruled by Electromagnetic forces, not Gravity.

a suggestion for anyone following this site who happens to be directly or tangentially involved in efforts to say skeptic climate scientists are paid to operate under an industry directive to lie about the issue:» Fess up about not having any evidence over the last 23 + years to back that up.

Steven Goddard has amassed massive amounts of graphs and data evidence of fraud with GISS, NOAA, BOM ect., No one actually cares or is even looking at this study, Hopefully it is because no one cares about global warming anymore except a few warmist fanatics and skeptics etc... Only serious legal action funded by a wealthy skeptic or the like will actually make anyone notice that is the sad fact I'm afraid.