Sentences with phrase «anyone agrees with you on»

I'm not sure anyone agrees with you on that.

Not exact matches

A settlement means that we're going to not chance it to the jury to make a decision, we agree to disagree on whether anyone did anything wrong but we're making a practical business decision, we're going to pay this much to be done with this case and not test the waters.

Don't agree to partner with anyone, or take on a partner, until you are clear in your own mind and on paper about how you would choose to end your business.

The problem with Islam is that the religion and the theocracy they establish is based on a book that tells them to kill anyone who does not agree to become a Muslim.

I think we can certainly agree that, if... at all possible, the more civility in anyone's discussions, the better (depending on the context and with whom, of course)... yes...?

> I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

Well, it's because no religious value, rule, law, tenet, or bit of dogma EVER trumps this nation's laws and we all agree on that, otherwise you might as well make the sleazy pope President and let the Ayatollah Khomeni be Vice President and we will live under religious sharia law with death for anyone who speaks blasphemy or who «dishonors» any religious figure whether real or not.

ex marriage wasn't on anyone's radar... Now you're consideref a freak if you don't agree with society's prevailing notions of «equality.»

@ tuition poor: I agree with that quote entirely... so why doesn't anyone start fixing the system and «teach them to fish» so that we can get these people back on their feet, become productive members of society, and off of welfare instead of just cutting the programs and denying the people that need it?

Well, duh, they worship a known child molester and insist on beheading anyone who doesn't agree with them.

But while I agree with them on many economic policies, I flatly refuse to vote for anyone in bed with the fundamentalists who are campaigning to take away the rights of their fellow citizens.

Although i do nt judge anyone, (only Jesus will do that) i agree with captainovious on the money thing.

Liberals on my side, we can be self - righteous, we can be condescending, we can be dismissive of anyone who doesn't agree with us.

Wouldn't it be in your best interest to agree with anyone that says they are divinely inspired on the off chance that they are?

Anyone of good conscience should agree with what I have said and ban together, so we can bring this country the very world we live on into the 21st century free of these groups hold on our minds and revel in all the promise this century has to offer so our children's children's children will look back in pride an see we did what we did for them and there posterity.

I mentioned that one of the biggest problems with the teaching is that it is difficult to find anyone that completely agrees on where the lines should be drawn.

I find it interesting how the «false prophet» teaching is always used on anyone who doesn't agree with one's particular view point.

I've got to agree with Bob, you would do best to sell your snake oil on a specifically fundamentalist Christian message board, picking out anyone who looks a little disgruntled.

I do not pass judgment on anyone who believes differently than I do, but I don't agree with being told it is hateful to share the truth.

Yes, Jesus a Liberal... and Ken you are a frightened human being... let it go... I'm not pushing anything on anyone... Christ loves everyone... man was made in God's image so deal with it... and me2 you and I both know it was the conservatives who wanted slavery... Abe Lincoln would be sickened by what has happened to his party... he was a man who stood on principle and believed in good for the common man... way different than the party you are tied to... Price... I agree with you in that there are many good Christians... unfortunately, there are many who are very ignorant and use Christ / God as a convenient excuse to denounce what they don't accept...

I don't see christian churches teaching people to stone anyone anymore, just to legislate against them (stomping on the first ammendment in the process) in hopes that they can ignore the reality of others not agreeing with everything they say, or not behaving in what they view as the right way.

Whatever we perceive to be the truth about God, I think there is some things we all can agree on, believers and anyone who doesn't believe in the existence of God and that is that it is self evident that all are born equal and with dignity and it's best if everyone relate to each other as part of the human family.

Hows that working out for you so to follow your example if you walk into my store give me a $ 20 for a $ 5 item and I give you $ 5 back are you going to allow me to «followed their own belief without interfering» What about if I choose to drive on the left side of the road, kill anyone who doesn't agree with me, take residence in your residence.

Do you have any idea how easy it is to take down your notion of bigotry... The majority of Christians do not hate anyone — but do not agree with the gay life... just as many gays would not choose the christian life — right!!?? People like you pride yourself on these little ideologies that you make feel better and sleep at night... stupid and sad.

Trying to pin point one specific area of motivation or inspiration is impossible - Something I think many writers, bloggers or anyone with a «voice» can agree on.

I agree with AW... a couple of top world class players and we have a team who will match it with anyone and enough quality depth for a campaign on multiple fronts.

All in all the result has boldly speak for itself and Arsene future is largely dependent on the final outcome of the current campaign and anyone should easily agree with me that Wenger doesn't like any Arsenal player more than himself.

here we go again» deluded» you jump up little brats come on here with your stupid comments and think anyone with half a brain that dosent agree or like your comments are idiots,, Pythagoras isnt making clever sarcastic comments he just talks s»» t which is fine if thats what he wants to do but we do nt have to like it,,, its you num nuts that are deluded and just strange,,

This is my opinion on our transfer strategy but firstly I'm not saying either we WILL or WILL NOT buy anyone, it's just an simple observation... I personally don't agree with us making it a habit of purchasing on deadline day but it now seems to be the Arsenal way.

Anyone connected with Arsenal shares the same desire, to see the Gunners win the Premier League title once again for the first time since the incredible Invincibles achieved what many thought was not possible back in 2004, but we do not all agree on the best way to do it.

i agree with Arsen on one thing and that is we can beat anyone on the night, hope that night is tonight

I agree there should be no personal abuse but let's keep it real I don't give a toss about Man U, Liverpool or anyone else we should only set our standars to the top teams and at the moment we are WAY OFF, so admin if you wish to support wenger that's fine, but it's also fine for what is the majority on here to want him out, you seem a typical wenger fan happy with fourth no matter who else is above Stop making excuses

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Who said I care if anyone agrees with me.If you think anything I've said is not true then kindly point it out instead of saying its nonsense.I'm not forcing you or anyone to accept what I'm saying.I'm also expressing my views on the topic.Do you think everything here you've said has made sense?

Anyone who does not agree wholeheartedly that Arshavin and Chamakh were the worst players to have pulled on the sacred red - with - white - sleeves since David Dein was the innocent victim of a boardroom coup has no place in this bar.

@Rilub, I fully agree with this guy writting for dailymail, i think I ve already stated this matter here previousely; some guys here said that im obsessed with the young - age fact of our players but to me thats simply the truth.No other manager would have reached this stage at season end with this kind of squad, comon guys 7 out of 11 players are merely 22 yrs old, most of them arent even 22 but still 21 and half of them arent much PL experienced; reached the 1 / 2final of CL, 4th on the PL, 1 / 2final fa cup.Look at the goal scored despite of our bad start early this season.This team is gonna surprise many people next season, we will all sit here and watch, I can even bet to anyone for at least a silverware.

One of the first things discussed was relationship contracts — yep, the contract in The New I Do that asks couples to talk, agree to and write down how they want to structure their relationship based on their goals and values, the same contract that Modern Love essayist and creative writing professor Mandy Len Catron used when moving in with her romantic partner, Mark, and that she highlights in her book, How to Fall in Love With Anywith her romantic partner, Mark, and that she highlights in her book, How to Fall in Love With AnyWith Anyone.

and everybody has opinions but if someone doesn't agree with it or doesn't know why you have that opinion then saying that they're a sad person or crazy or an idiot, and so on, isn't going to get anyone anywhere except piss people off.

I hope Janet and anyone else interested in this topic will read my latest article on Jean Ronnei, and see why I agree with Bettina that her response was «business as usual.»

Examples include one sleeping upstairs, the other downstairs; agreeing on a schedule of time with the kids; agreeing to separate financial obligations other than those that impact the family (mortgage, insurance payments, etc.); agreeing that in their free time, they can go anywhere, see anyone and do anything they wish; that each can have another relationship but that no one is introduced to the kids without prior permission.

Although I didn't do the VBAC, thing I did have one of each, and I agree, natural is hands down better and on top of that I felt I actually did something to earn my precious baby, C - section is not something I'd recommend to anyone and it took me a long time to get over the disappointment and knowing that I would never experience the joy of childbirth again, anyway, I digress, the pics are gorgeous and I can't wait to see them used in some layouts, I hope the girls are enjoying their new baby brother and I have no doubt he will be brought up with three mothers!

But I have really enjoyed reading and agree with most that is stated on this blog if anyone is interested.

I agree with Darling insofar as he is as saying that the Tories and the Lib Dems are undertaking an ideological war on the public sector (did anyone listen to Edwina Currie's orgasmic squeal at the thought of denying funding to a hospital on any questions?).

People lump together on the right anyone from staunchly anti-religious «sex maniac» Ayn Rand to «Family Values» Christian fundamentalists some of whom literally wouldn't agree with Randian Objectivists about anything other than statists / Communists being a common opponent.

«I don't think it is moral to accept land from Donald Trump - or from anyone - with an agreed upon deal for the donor's name to remain on the 435 acres of parkland that he gave, and then to reject and erase the name of the person who gave it.»

I agree with you on a and b Topo, but I've observed Silver long enough to know he seldom does the right thing by anyone but Silver.

Republicans quickly seized on Nixon's entry into the race, with many welcoming anyone willing to take on Cuomo, even though they hardly agree with Nixon on most issues.

Do not accept anything that anyone says on face value, especially if you are inclined to agree with it; this is just too important.

Yes, I agree with you and Shirley on that one: anyone will fall for pretty packaging, food or not.