Sentences with phrase «anyone argue against you»

So why would anyone argue against a program that makes me a better teacher?

I mean in the face of all that truth, how could anyone argue against you?

Not exact matches

I don't think anyone would claim that specific groups can't have their own Facebook - like web site, but this particular site is perpetuating a gender segregation philosophy / ideology that many find abhorrent and readily use their free speech rights to argue against.

The sort of thing I would have thought that no one would really want to argue against in this day and age, yet here you are, calling me a «fear - monger» and talking like I was against anyone using their life experiences to make decisions.

Anyone who would argue with this, man or woman, is in rebellion against God and not man.

I can not understand how anyone who regards Scripture as authoritative can argue against the personhood of the fetus.

Perhaps Eichenwald's greatest folly is in arguing that anyone who adopts Paul's lawfree gospel must give up on the prohibitions of Leviticus against homosexual practice.

I was simply arguing that that accidental fact should not constitute an essential psychological identity for anyone, and that the frequent occurrence of this identity could never ground a proscription against same - sex sodomy anyway.

The final three chapters summarily consider the evidence against and for the virgin birth, arguing that it is neither myth nor indemonstrable truth; instead the evidence for the existence of an historical tradition anteceding the Gospels, ultimately from Mary herself, is more credible than any alternative explanation; hence, for anyone open to the possibility of miracles, there is good evidence to affirm Jesus» virgin birth on the basis of the New Testament's testimony.

I would say to anyone out there that claims they are not bigoted but merely taking a godly stand against what they believe to be sinful, If you want to honestly examine it, the next time you are going to say something to a homosexual, treat them a certain way, or argue that certain rights should be denied them, ask yourself a few simple questions.

«Anyone who is arguing against [support] for a particular group or subset because it's exclusive is also arguing for an end for any support from this council to any ethnic groups.»

Against a purely pragmatic approach, he argued that anyone who tries to deny «the reality of this whole of truth» is caught in a self - contradiction.

I can not fathom for the life of me how anyone who calls themselves Christian, and who wants a Christian - run government, can argue against clothing / feeding / healing the needy.

It's almost boring to argue with you at this point because in almost all of your comments you go against anything anyone says.

In speaking engagements, and increasingly on television, he prosecuted his strategy to subvert the status quo by donning a suit and, in perfect and impossible - to - argue - against rhetoric, spouted the sort of radical ideology — pointing out the causal chain between U.S. foreign policy and terrorism — that would have landed anyone else in talk - show purgatory.

It doesn't cost anything to stand and anyone motivated to want to leaflet all the houses in their ward and argue against Brexit will have the desire, passion and skills needed to make a success of being a councillor if elected.

And it could be that because men can reproduce throughout their lives, they are less vested in anyone other than their own children; Lummaa is examining whether men continue to procreate into old age, although a monogamous culture such as Finland's argues against it.

And if my brother and I argued with my father about race — he was an Irishman of the old school, and he hated the English so much he didn't have much energy to hate anyone else — but he had a mild prejudice against blacks.

Anyone who argues against cookie cutter curriculum where students and teachers alike are asked to perform like robots - no real dialogue as a teacher can only address the learning point in a 5 - 10 minute sound byte followed by 20 minute independent student work time where students demonstrate understanding of the teaching point... concluding in a 10 - 15 minute share out time.

It's hard to argue against the 328d xDrive Sports Wagon as a competent SUV replacement for anyone who's all crossed - out over crossovers.

Shocking that anyone would argue against making it a priority.

It annoys me that Republicans argue against elimination of special tax benefits for anyone, calling it a tax increase.

Honestly, the fact that anyone is arguing against this topic is just blind to the real world.

An accessible historical shooter that combines casual gameplay with stunning design is never something to be sniffed at, and I defy anyone to argue against the overwhelming success of EA's least controversial — and in my opinion most enjoyable — title.

The Requiem: I don't think anyone is arguing against getting more o» «dem sweet, 3D Classics.

It really doesn't make any sense for anyone to argue against it, unless they are absolutely sure that climate sensitivity is very low.

I have read sufficient on the subject of the timing between the onset of a solar magnetic minimum and global temperatures that I am willing to play devil «s advocate and argue against anything that anyone suggests is true.

It is difficult to see how anyone can argue against it, and it provides a means to unite people from both sides of the argument.

And, will anyone who thinks they've already seen posts arguing against the collection of QC data please quote those posts and explain how you arrive at that interpretation?

If you're interested in seeing what playing the player instead of the ball looks like, check out the alarmist site Only In It For the Gold, where Michael Tobis unleashes endless vicious ad hominem against any skeptics who raise their voice (his most recent was a long diatribe against Freeman Dyson, whom he apparently considers a geriatric buffoon), and opens threads on what names one should call «denialists», regularly bans commenters who argue a point too vociferously, or anyone claiming scientific credentials but arguing against «the consensus».

I don't know anyone who would argue against that, but I also have no idea why it's not happening yet, so what do I know.

No matter who you talk to, I don't think anyone can argue against the fact that the Galaxy Note 8 is one of the most powerful phones you can buy right now.

In 1977, Ken Olson, the president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., the maker of big business mainframe computers argued against the PC and stated that «there is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home.»