Sentences with phrase «anyone coming to the state»

The CP added that the Nissan car was also recovered from the suspects and warned that anyone coming to the state with the intention of committing crimes should not dare.

Not exact matches

With the growing affluence generated by the Industrial Revolution, however, came the gradual rise of the welfare state, a safety net woven from myriad programs offering cash and services to anyone who was poor, disabled or involuntarily unemployed.

So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

He may also block visas from the countries, effectively preventing anyone living there from coming to the United States.

Canon 812 states that anyone teaching Catholic theology in a Catholic institution needs some form of ecclesiastical approval, a «mandate» to teach that comes from the «competent ecclesiastical authority.»

I had a Geology professor once who candidly stated that the subject of Evolution would come up frequently during the semester, that if anyone felt uncomfortable it, to remember one thing: You «are not» required to «believe» any of the theories discussed in this class; however, you «are» required to «know» the materiel well enough to pass the written tests».

Rahn... Do i really need to back up what i think online... and you being the expert... why do nt you fully explain to me the state that the country is in... enlighten me... but you already know how far that will go... just as my attempt to change others mind's fell short... so will any others opinion... i have my mind made up for my own well founded reasons... all im saying is that spending all day protesting and postulating is of no benefit to anyone... going about your life and making things best for yourself is in the best interest of this country as a whole... I believe Adam Smith said it best... the best results come from one person doing whats best for himself and the team... not throwing a hissy fit

Well, for one thing Romney isn't in any church leadership role currently, so basically he is just like anyone else who is of a certain faith who also happens to be running for office, so how does someone in that situation run for office when it comes to the idea of separation of church and state?

The Badgers still haven't played anyone, but as if on cue: Iowa, fresh off that epochal cratering of Ohio State, comes to town.

Duke has great shooters, and if the Blue Devils get hot, they can beat anyone in the country, but Iowa State has proven an ability to respond to scoring runs with furious runs of their own, coming from 22 down against Oklahoma and 17 down against Kansas.

Spoiler Alert people, we are not getting anyone in the front striker position OTHER than what we already have, there was a story in the star yestrday about the 250 million wenger is looking to spend on the likes of Marco Ruess ect ect and I really can not believe that after all these years the Prof will change his ways and spend all that money and evern if he was going to he needs to pull his finger out as all the top players are being strongly linked with other clubs, meanwhile we wait for the brat Vardy to make up his mind when we know he is highly unlikely to come to us another summer of dissapointment for us as wenger has already stated that Giroud will lead the line next season.

so to anyone who believes that Mo will field a weakened team tomorrow then you're more delusional than Wenger is and even he has come out and stated that he is ignoring Mo's comments lol..

like I've said before, Wenger is simply stating that Sanchez is staying so that he can regain some leverage when it comes time to make a deal and to shift the focus back squarely on Sanchez... this is 101 tactics in PR management... the very fact that he even mentioned RVP's name speaks to the utterance arrogance of a man that believes he answers to no one... before you harshly judge Sanchez think carefully about what the ultimate intentions of both parties involved... Sanchez wants to win trophies and get paid generously for his efforts, whereas the club wants to pull the wool over our eyes once again so that we blame the player for wanting the very things we told him we wanted when we brought him in... how many times do we have to go down this road before we realize the only common factor in each of these scenarios is the club itself... trust me, if we showed any ambition Sanchez's contract demands would be much different... just like in other major sports players will take a «home town» discount if they see those in charge making a truly honest attempt to fight for the highest honours in their respective fields... that being said, if they see a team trying to make disparaging remarks about them in the press and not following through on their promises, they will likely try to make them pay a premium for their services or seek greener pastures... btw if anyone simply looks at the score versus Bayern today and thinks that even for a second that this was a deserved victory, just watch the game and judge for yourself... actually save yourself the anguish and just know that if it weren't for Cech and Martinez this could have been a repeat of our Champions League flopping or worse

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The answers will have to come largely from state governments, even though neither sportsmen nor property owners appreciate state control, and game commissions have seldom been willing to offend anyone.

... iv only just seen this and it saddens me — we are in real bad shape and anyone who loves this club will know bould and wenger is a comedy act — somebody... anybody... step in and save this club from a state of freefall — i was having a decent day, only to come in to this.

Rose stated, «I am not saying I want out, but if something came to me that was concrete, I would have no qualms about voicing my opinions to anyone at the club, When you're injured you get a lot of time to think and I've had a lot of «what if?»

But with this came the necessity for women to sleep well as a woman who is sleep - deprived does not serve anyone well in any capacity (it is truly strange that we have adopted the modern view that sleep deprivation is a «normal» state of affairs with a newborn).

Little did anyone know that what Peter Obi called cash - in - hand were basically investment in stocks, bonds and other non-performing equities arranged by Obi in his final days in office; long - term uncompleted assets that will not earn cash until they are completed; various sums spent in rehabilitating federal roads in the State for which re-imbursements may come in the distant future; computation of the State's share of the Excess Crude Account contributed as capital to the Nigerian Sovereign Wealth Fund in 2010, etc..

Empire State Development did not provide guidance on how to read the report, so anyone not privy to state definitions of certain terms may have come to the same conclusion as the assembly meState Development did not provide guidance on how to read the report, so anyone not privy to state definitions of certain terms may have come to the same conclusion as the assembly mestate definitions of certain terms may have come to the same conclusion as the assembly member.

Chris Keates: «It should come as no surprise to anyone that the Secretary of State is selecting criteria to define coasting schools to maximise the opportunity for extending academisation.»

On a plain reading, it seems like it would allow individual states not just to import slaves, but to carry out their own immigration policy, allowing anyone at all, even free people, to come into the country.

The last thing that anyone would want is legal complications to arise from importing marijuana products over state lines without federal approval, or for unnecessary delays with the implementation of the current program to come as a result of layering a separate process on top of it.»

But that disagreement morphed into open warfare yesterday as Commission Co-Chair Kathleen Rice lashed out at one of the dissenters, Onondaga County Executive Joanie Mahoney, all but accusing her of lying when it comes to the commission's ability — and willingness — to include anyone other than state legislators in its public corruption probe.

Faso voted against New York State sovereignty (yes, against state's rights, a supposed bedrock of Republican doctrine) when he voted in favor of anyone from an «open carry» state having the right to come to New York and brandish weapons — with their state laws overriding ourState sovereignty (yes, against state's rights, a supposed bedrock of Republican doctrine) when he voted in favor of anyone from an «open carry» state having the right to come to New York and brandish weapons — with their state laws overriding ourstate's rights, a supposed bedrock of Republican doctrine) when he voted in favor of anyone from an «open carry» state having the right to come to New York and brandish weapons — with their state laws overriding ourstate having the right to come to New York and brandish weapons — with their state laws overriding ourstate laws overriding our own.

«I think it's essential that we have the hearings that you've asked for on the state level, on the federal level, so that we have as many people as possible pay attention to the crisis here and come up with real solutions so that it never again happens to us or to anyone else in America,» Gillibrand, a Democrat, told more than 200 residents during a roundtable discussion about the PFOA pollution in Hoosick Falls and nearby Petersburgh.

Jessica Post, executive director of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, which works to win and defend state legislative majorities, added that «the fight for a Democratic state Senate majority is one that should be joined by anyone who claims to care about standing up to the backward policies coming from the Trump administration.»

This comes after Cuomo directed the Port Authority, the Department of State and Davis's office yesterday to jointly explore all legal options to help anyone detained at New York airports, and to ensure that the rights of refugees are protected under the law.

If anyone is using the 2014 elections to measure the popularity of the APC in Ekiti State, or to have the belief that if another election comes, it will go that way, that belief will be the greatest mistake of the century.

Peggy understands the state in which her patients come to her — she «gets» the breast cancer world and, as a result, she provides the most effective therapy available anywhere by anyone.

It's impossible to imagine anyone, right - leaning or left, coming away from this hugely important documentary unshaken by its representation of the United States and its military establishment.

You have other games like State of Mind coming out in August which also looks awesome and barely anyone seems to notice, while I seem to be the only person in the world to consider it the most exciting game to come out on the system this year XD.

Eddie Redmayne is the perfect choice to play Newt Scamander, a charming, bumbling English wizard with a briefcase full of wonderful creatures who comes to the United States in the mid-1920s, 70 years before anyone knows the name Harry Potter.

Could anyone truly imagine that those 2012 reforms, together with whatever initiatives and meager funding may come out of the 2013 legislature, are sufficient for affixing the «Mission Accomplished» banner outside the Capitol complex, proclaiming that the state at long last is meeting its constitutional obligation to schoolchildren?

Good looks don't guarantee a good car, however — anyone who remembers the earliest of the modern MINI models that came to the States will know very well that style can very much be achieved at the expense of substance.

When it comes to opining on seniors carrying debt into retirement, I'll state upfront my personal bias that anyone with credit - card debt — or even mortgage debt — has no business fantasizing about retirement.

Dogs are among the best animals when it comes to providing models for better medical treatments in humans, and with more than 77 million dogs in the United States alone, it's another way the human - animal bond has become closer than anyone had ever dreamed.

Gift certificates are available for that purpose * ALL pets are to be kept indoors * If you are out of state and wish to adopt, you will need to make arrangements to come pick up the pet * We reserve the right to refuse any adoption to anyone, for any reason, at any time, in accordance with our experience and responsibility for the pets in our care * Please be aware that our Only objective is to permanently re-home these pets in the best possible environment for their specific needs * We run Strictly out of Foster Homes.

But knowing the composition of the state legislature, and the hostility of the Republican leadership in both chambers to Prop B, we knew that we'd have to entertain compromise on some elements of the agreement (at no point, ever, publically, has Pacelle or anyone from HSUS mentioned any thought of compromise — and likely, this is why they didn't have a seat at the table when it came to this new law), in order to protect the measure for the long term and to obviate the need for a second public vote on the issue.

'' UDK for mobile development brings the power of Unreal Engine 3 to virtually anyone, allowing them to realise their own game ideas, and make them come to life on their own mobile devices,» states Epic's Shane Caudle.

So it seems that anyone providing expert scientific testimony to a legislative committee of a state or the US government had better ensure that all their research funds come form a Greenpeace approved source or else it becomes «lobbying».

If you aren't willing to admit when you've made a fundamental scientific mistake about source rock formation (that relates directly to your stated profession of hydrocarbon geology), then why should anyone listen to anything you have to say, particularly when it comes to atmospheric and ocean sciences?

Besides as stated before: If you think the above is not how NASA or anyone else would calculate the flux at the earth why does my number 1366W / m ^ 2 come so close to the measured value of 1368W / m ^ 2?

It should come as no surprise to anyone who has been following the state of the Canadian justice system that we are facing a looming catastrophe when it comes to court - certified interpreters.

The CBA's Code of Professional Conduct on Obligatory Withdrawal states: «4 (a) if the lawyer is instructed by the client to do something inconsistent with the lawyer's duty to the court or tribunal and, following explanation, the client persists in such instructions etc.;» Regrettably, I believe the B.C. SC has totally missed the point: upholding the law comes first and therefore, anyone engaging in white - collar criminal activity should be charged or the public will loose faith and confidence in the independence and impartiality of the Justice System.

LawLink, however, is restricted to American lawyers only — among the required application fields are «Bar Number» and «State,» and can I just say how annoying it is to come across any major online operation that offers access, service or delivery to anyone in the 50 states but nowhere else in the world?

This move shouldn't come as a surprise though to anyone paying attention to the Speech from the Throne, where the Prime Minister stated,

While guaranteed issue life insurance policies are great in that they will basically insure anyone who is a US citizen and is between the ages of 40 - 85 (not all guaranteed issue life insurance policies are offered in all states), they do come with their own set of DISADVANTAGES that one needs to be fully aware of before considering purchasing a guaranteed issue life insurance policy.

When they finally do come in, although I never believe it is too late for anyone to be helped, the situations have reached such a crisis state that it takes that much longer to resolve.

These basic lessons are the «why» behind these two columns: * Never accept the numbers you receive from CRA as being correct; always make sure you understand and agree; * Always insist on the background calculations and assumptions to the numbers; there is no way anyone should pay a bill without understanding it; too many people just pay when it comes to CRA; * Never give up if you think you are right; having said this, I do not know yet if the company in this story will in fact file a second Notice of Objection to recover the additional $ 1,000... cost benefit does enter into the equation at times; * There are a surprising number of CRA staff in the various departments who are understanding and helpful; * As I have stated in earlier columns, there are mechanisms built into the system that protect and allow taxpayers to challenge CRA where it is appropriate.