Sentences with phrase «anyone doing such things»

Not exact matches

But anyone in a position like his — at the head of a media empire — ought to have the good judgment not to do things that require such public apology in the first place.

I know that I do, but something inside me can't believe anyone would do such a thing.

And if God would do such a thing, I don't understand why anyone would want to associate Him.

You won't believe me or anyone else telling you much the same thing the bible tells you, and really, it's best if you get it direct from the bible, or God if you can convince him to do such for you... which is not likely if you reject him and don't believe anything he says or does.

Anyone who can see any possible good in things such as this I simply don't trust not to OK any modern atrocity as long as they believe that this same God wants it.

Well, they probably did, even though few people, if anyone, believes such a thing today.

There are no eternal consequences to anything that anyone ever does, so Catholicism is just unfounded beliefs and rituals practiced by people who are comforted by such things.

But I just don't believe that anyone could be so stupid as to say such a thing over the internet, using a computer.

And that anyone who would do such things isn't walking as Jesus.

It baffles me as to why we do this, especially when it seems to me that Jesus makes a point of telling us that He is what God looks like, and in the Gospels, Jesus never kills, goes to war, or tells anyone to do such things, but instead to love and forgive our enemies.

I'm willing to wager that anyone who believes such a thing has a mental issue that has nothing to do with his faith or lack thereof.

Things such as in the old test do not commit adultry then in the new Jesus taught if anyone looks upon a woman to lust they have already commited adultry in their hearts.

Anyone living in relative comfort will see the inequality of life that is just not fair, yet we carry on buying a cup of Starbucks, or using an iphone even though such things done without by many could radically change life for others.

We've done so because the people at the top prefer a permissive atmosphere that allows us to do as we wish» as long as we don't hurt anyone, a judgment call that ends up ruling out things upper - middle - class people don't like, such as smoking and putting glass bottles in plastics - only recycling bins.

Anyone that writes «'' God has answered prayer»... Argghhhh... there is no such super power that does such things... Argggghhhh» is to have a discussion that is a polemic for atheism.

But then... what «reasonable» christian has seen the blind see, the lame walk, the dumb speak or has themselves done such things as Jesus said, «I tell you the truth, anyone who has faith in me will do the things I have been doing..»

And for anyone who suspects that hemp brownies are truly a throwback to the 60s, let me say, first of all, that the hemp seeds in these are the edible kind, so you are not ingesting any mind - altering chemicals whatsoever here (unless you count the flood of serotonins in the brain due to their heavenly taste); and second of all, hemp is not the same thing as hash, and of course the classic hippie confection was a hash brownie; and third of all, how the heck would I even know, because I never did manage to consume any of the latter, even in my undergrad days, because I am such a nerd that nobody ever offered me any, and hash brownies never appealed to me, anyway — I mean, why sully your chocolate with psychedelic drugs?

but i was wondering if anyone or Erika if you have a suggestion or a good biscuit recpie you have used with this blend that you could share with me please, and Sorry for leaving such long comments i just did not want anyon to see my previous comment and worry things would not turn out with substitutions.

7) Lastly — did anyone know there is such a thing as a «false No. 11»?

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Whether you're planning one yourself, interested on behalf of a friend or family member, or merely curious about why anyone would do such a thing, this 3 - hour seminar is for you!

Insurers do NOT want to pay that out, so anyone who does such a thing will find it impossible to find insurance in the future because they are doing things the insurer explicitly said weren't allowed.

That doesn't mean that its right or that I want my kids exposed to such things, or that anyone's kids should be exposes to such things.

Does anyone know of such a thing, whether in US Law, British common law, AU law, or any Common Law nation.

Archaeologists have long thought that people in the Old World were planting, watering, weeding, and harvesting for a good 5,000 years before anyone in the New World did such things.

While Emmons is intrigued by Oren's hunt, she says the chances of such a thing being anywhere in the Amazon are minuscule because naturalists have been poking around there for centuries: «I've never heard anyone mention anything that is something we don't know about, particularly a large animal.»

Since I'm still in recovery mode and taking things easy with my hip and the healing stress fracture and such, I've been choosing sleeping in rather than getting up early to get my workout done before anyone wakes up.

haha), Firstly, I would love to read a study of centenarians from a Western culture, does anyone know if there is such a thing?

How does anyone accomplish such things from writing a blog?

I believe you; I just don't see a lot of film PR material and it hadn't occurred to me before that anyone would do such a daft thing with this particular trilogy.

As much anyone will tell you there is no such thing as too much power, there is a point where power will just overwhelm the tires and you'll be sitting there, doing a burnout.

Even then, she didn't know anyone who could afford such things.

At the time, I didn't know anyone who'd indie - published their work — and worse, I didn't even know anybody who was aware such a thing was possible.

The reason traditionally published authors & the traditional publishing side has such disdain for self - publishing is not because anyone & everyone CAN do it, but because MOST of the ones who DO IT have self - published either unpublishable garbage OR have taken a manuscript with great potential & published it without decent editing & revision (both of which seriously hinder the enjoyment of the reading audience - not an issue if you're a hobby writer who just wants to entertain family & friends, but a serious issue for anyone who thinks that that sort of thing can hold its own against carefully revised & edited workdo it, but because MOST of the ones who DO IT have self - published either unpublishable garbage OR have taken a manuscript with great potential & published it without decent editing & revision (both of which seriously hinder the enjoyment of the reading audience - not an issue if you're a hobby writer who just wants to entertain family & friends, but a serious issue for anyone who thinks that that sort of thing can hold its own against carefully revised & edited workDO IT have self - published either unpublishable garbage OR have taken a manuscript with great potential & published it without decent editing & revision (both of which seriously hinder the enjoyment of the reading audience - not an issue if you're a hobby writer who just wants to entertain family & friends, but a serious issue for anyone who thinks that that sort of thing can hold its own against carefully revised & edited work).

Example: Many people (myself included) don't appreciate 1 - star reviews on the Kindle DX that include only comments such as «I can't understand how anyone could pay more than $ 300 for this thing!

I can't afford to buy an ISBN on it's own; I'm both a student and still looking for a job to throw money at such things, and the situation isn't great at the moment, I could use a company that provides them, and one that doesn't discriminate my age, if anyone knows of any?

Sure, anyone can do it, or self - publishing wouldn't be such a thing.

You may wonder why anyone would want to do such a thing, the answer is simple: To avoid paying interests on that amount.

Buildings can be brought down killing anyone in them, however certain things can't be destroyed such as staircase's, this maintaints a more playable game but does look a bit odd.

A few setbacks that will be fixed is a bad thing, not saying it isn't or that it's not worth demerits / penalties - but it's obvious that server problems at launch - as bad as they are to the consumers, to get such a hefty pounding over it where a reviewer is all like «I take my review back, I'm lowering my score until the servers get better - Oh hey, 6 months later the servers are better, here, have a 7.5 again» That does not sound professional no matter how you want to put it (Not like anyone goes to Polygon for anything professional anyways): / Short - comings or downfalls that are temporary should be given Shame I'd say, a definite negative feedback in some variety which comes all but naturally with the players whether a reviewer points it out or not, customer reviewers do that and I think should be used for these kind of problems.

I normally don't say things like this but with such a stupid argument already heating up, i might as well: Anyone who gets angry at an optional help system might just be retarded.

For one thing, there are quite a few sections in this game that are a tad confusing if you don't know what you're doing, so anyone trying to beat it without a guide (such as say, anyone in Europe since IGN and GameExplain seem to be under Nintendo of America embargos) is likely going to spend a good few extra hours running around kind of aimlessly trying to figure out what to do next.

JG Does anyone really believe that there is such a thing as «the mainstream» anymore?

In the latter sense anyone who's stayed awake in their Phil 101 course knows there's no such thing as «correct» (though you keep arguing anyway); while in the former sense the new airplane design either crashes or it doesn't.

I don't know of anyone else in science who actually does such things but fails to do something constructive himself.»

Libertarians look at such things as social / economic planning, centralized, top - down structures and natural systems (such as the climate) and see them as largely unpredictable and uncontrollable, and they are very suspect when anyone claims to be able to do so.

Why would anyone do such fundamentally stupid things unless they were caught up in a social phenomenon described best as the madness of crowds?

It was just an expression on my part and I didn't think anyone in their right mind would actually do such a thing.

I've done no such thing, and I would think anyone with basic reading comprehension skills should see that.

I know it's not good to scratch at such infectious things, but do you know anyone who never scratches at irritants?