It really doesn't matter if you or
anyone hold a belief about some kind of «intelligent design».
Christian does not necessarily equal Creationist — except in the minds of those who oppose
anyone holding any belief they don't like.
Not exact matches
It's as though you aren't really interested in examining your
beliefs, as though the validity of them is entirely meaningless, and you only care about
holding them in lieu of anything
anyone else says.
Sadly, I no longer share my thoughts on religion with
anyone that is not an atheist for I have found very few believers can
hold an open discussion without resorting to insults when they feel their
beliefs are being questioned.
However, this is no personal attack on you or
anyone who
holds such
beliefs.
Conceding to believers that they can redefine the term «religion» to encompass «atheism», or whatever other ideas they wish to encompass within the word, if that suits their purposes in trying to put
anyone who doesn't believe in their god or any god into the same category as themselves, grants to them the opportunity to dismiss
anyone who doesn't believe in their god as
holding a religious
belief no more valid then their own and to classify you as just another follower of a «false religion» unlike their own, which is the «true» religion.
Now I'm certain I'll vote for Obama, because there's no way I would side with
anyone who
holds the
beliefs that you do.
Anyone who has read Collins's book, however, should realize that Collins absolutely and unequivocally
holds the
belief that God knows all events from all eternity.
Seeing the support for Chick - fil - A, I am amazed, no flabbergasted, no at a complete and utter loss to understand, how
anyone, and I mean
anyone, can
hold these
beliefs.
Not you, nor I, nor
anyone may cast judgement on another for the
beliefs you can
hold in your heart, because no one can take your spirit from you.
The group has terrorized villages with unspeakable savagery against
anyone who does not
hold their radical
beliefs: They've video taped beheadings, systematically executed Christian children and publicly crucified civilians...
Toward my
belief system, religion is a personal
belief and should not be a sociable consideration...
Anyone's
beliefs upon religious conjuring séances should be
held personally and not be centered by any socialism of the religiously clairvoyant which tends to conjure their weekly seminary séances upon the weakly enamored folks ever forsaking the doctrines oaths... Emotionalisms are where religious circles are deemed rented and the renters pay steeply for a yarn's worth... Therefore keeps one's faith separated from religious teamsters who take and never give their folded flocks any causally rational explanations as to why there are reportedly many more of God's many sons then what Christendom so portends there to be...
Toward my
belief system, religion is a personal
belief and should not be a sociable consideration...
Anyone's
beliefs upon religious conjuring séances should be
held personally and not be centered by any socialism of the religiously clairvoyant which tends to conjure their weekly seminary séances upon the weakly enamored folks ever forsaking the doctrines oaths... Emotionalisms are where religious circles are deemed rented and the renters pay steeply for a yarn's worth... Therefore keep one's faith separated from religious teamsters who take and never give their folded flocks any causally rational explanations as to why there are reportedly many more of God's many sons then what Christendom so potentially claims there to be...
Anyone holding to a different view or
belief (especially religious) is ridiculed as possessing a sub-standard intellect by the Atheistic - run world status quo.
BTW: It in no way makes me hate
anyone nor does it deny
anyone their civic rights for me to
hold that
belief.
There was a sect called Khawaarij, who worshipped Allah only in fear and
held the
belief that
anyone who commits major sins was a disbeliever and would be thrown into the Hellfire forever.
You can preach a
belief in a singular God, but no human has right to
hold their own dogma above
anyone else.
First of all I'm no scholar, I
hold no judgement against
anyone or their
beliefs.
A
belief in science should be a litmus test for
anyone holding national office... period.
Anytime
anyone holds firm
beliefs that can not be changed it causes problems, no matter if they are religious, scientific or political.
Examine your life and
beliefs with the end goal of determining whether you
hold your
beliefs because you've genuinely found them to be true or because they were given to you by your parents, friends, teachers, or
anyone else.
-- Paul never persecuted
anyone (if Paul persecuted
anyone, it would have been for a
belief that he didn't
hold, and you are saying that Paul invented the whole resurrection story and convinced the «disciples» to pretend later)-- So, after Jesus death, the disciples went back to their occupations and stayed that way for 10 years or so (the date of Pauls earliest letters)-- Then, Paul, a successful member of the Jewish authority decided to invent a new religion.
«Phillips gladly serves
anyone who walks into his store, but, as is customary practice for many artists, he declines opportunities to design for a variety of events and messages that conflict with his deeply
held beliefs.
«
Anyone who has these
beliefs is unfit to
hold public office and especially unfit to oversee the education of children.»
Anyone wishing to have a humanist wedding, which can be fully customised to match the couple's deepest
held personal
beliefs, must also have a separate civil registration.
While I believe the Paleolithic option would be superior in the measure of blood markers and all health related parameters, my personal
beliefs count for shit in the face of evidence — and this should
hold true for
anyone who talks about nutrition.
I'm sorry for
anyone who is still
holding onto this
belief, but though the film happens to be excellent and thoroughly entertaining and perhaps even a cultural milestone, it simply isn't the best film imaginable.
In case
anyone still
holds the charming
belief (as I do) that the mechanics of plot have a bearing on our enjoyment of a novel, the reviewer feels obliged to perform his task up front.
Does
anyone think a person can participate in a reasonable discussion and
hold this
belief?
But don't expect to change the mind of
anyone who
holds the
belief that humans are causing global warming because this is a religious
belief for them.
I would appreciate it if any readers would keep that in mind, and educate
anyone who might
hold this mistaken
belief.
Instead, we believe it is the result of one or more of the following four causes: Chemical imbalance Unresolved events from the past
Beliefs you
hold that are inconsistent with what is true Inability to cope with current conditions
Anyone who is abusing drugs and alcohol is doing so because of one or more of these four causes.
We welcome
anyone regardless of his or her faith
beliefs and show respect to those who
hold different religious views.