Sentences with phrase «anyone presenting evidence»

Not exact matches

«In fact there was no evidence presented that since his brother's arrest, Mr. Zachary Cruz has threatened anyone, has ever exhibited or shown violence toward anyone, or that he has been seen by anyone with a weapon.»

«There was no evidence presented at the hearing that Mr. Zachary Cruz had threatened anyone during this arrest, that he resisted in anyway, or that he was uncooperative with police,» he wrote.

If you want anyone to believe your schtick these days, you'd better have evidence to present, and you can be sure it will get exposed to a lot of examination.

I'd suggest that anyone wishing to assess the validity of your claims need only ask himself or herself, «What is the credibility of the evidence presented by noahsdadtopher?

We not only announce the promise of the Gospel, that God gives eternal life to anyone who believes in Jesus for it, but we also present whatever supporting evidence is needed to help people accept and believe that Gospel promise.

A Christian case against these developments seems unlikely, on present evidence, to be put with any coherence or conviction by anyone but Catholics: so of course, it will be thought that «religious objections» are obscurantist and irrelevant.

I would say in any and every situation until all facts come out, and all evidence is presented, that every man and woman should have his / her day in court before any judgement of them, their character or otherwise is rendered by anyone.

This is a medical issue, not a political one, and there's no reason why anyone should feel they have to present an opposing view if that view is irrational or unsupported by the evidence.

Even if I didn't, I certainly could not accuse her of either attacking anyone else nor of not thoroughly presenting her thought process and evidence.

Comey feels that it doesn't, and he has more information on the matter than anyone else; but that doesn't mean that someone else couldn't come to a different conclusion when presented with the same evidence.

If there is anyone reading this letter who can offer their urgent help for an honest investigation (like the one recently imposed upon Assemblyman (and employed sexual predator) Vito Lopez, I would be happy to present a chronology of solid evidence to support my languishing case.

Anyone who continues to present this kind of argument as evidence should be shunned as a flim - flam man.

To blindly cling to trend following as a religion, disregarding any real world evidence and attacking anyone presenting ideas that differ to the trend following mantra is not only unprofessional, it's outright dangerous....

James Montier presents even more evidence that humans can not forecast and why you should avoid listening to anyone who says he can as well as avoid it yourself.

As the body of evidence presents itself, one is left to wonder what particular psychogical framework allows anyone to continue to obstruct meaningful social recognition of anthropogenic climate change?

Anyone claiming the above must present solid evidence for a MEDIEVAL COLD PERIOD on the southern hemisphere.

If anyone knows their rationale to conclude that in spite of the 2 evidences to the contrary that I have presented, I'd greatly appreciate it.

Anyone with the least understanding of human nature knows that when big money [as in $ billions], reputations and careers are involved, the only way the truth can be extracted from the self - serving «good old boy» establishment is in an adversarial setting, where evidence and witnesses can be presented, and their statements cross-examined under oath.

By contrast M & M presented experimental evidence from the real world, all well documented in every detail so that anyone interested could examine it and if desired, repeat it.

It's not a question of tracking down and apologising to anyone who may have read the statement, it's a matter of there being some continuity in the evidence presented.

The defendant, however, has presented no evidence that the mock obituaries and voting on this web site were intended to threaten anyone, did actually threaten anyone, or manifested any violent tendencies whatsoever.