There is much that could be said
about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at
about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that
atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of
atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of
atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of
atheism, they prove that their
atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for
anything but giving
atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.
Actually Jesus you're wrong
about what
Atheism said, prayer changes things by not doing
anything and allowing the natural (disastrous) course of events to transpire.
Regardless, my initial sentence is
about the discussion on morality, where you started again from scratch with on
atheism as if we hadn't been discussing
anything for the past hour or so.