Therefore we can not conclude
anything about the causality between bullying and psychopathic traits.
When I started looking at this topic the first thing that struck me was just how much time is spent in the blogosphere debating the effects (real or imagined) of global temperature rise and how little time seemed to be spent on the key evidential science; as though retreating glaciers, arctic sea - ice or coral bleaching said
anything about causality.
«This is a cross-sectional study; we can not say
anything about causality,» he explains.
Not exact matches
So to my mind this issue does not fall into the category of it being an arbitrary claim
about causality without any basis or in your words it being a case where it is «quite easy to claim
anything».
Causality in
anything remotely as complicated as the climate system is an exceedingly difficult concept, and I would argue anyone who instantly says «yes this must be right» or «no this is wrong» or even that «this is important» can not possibly know what he is talking
about.