Sentences with phrase «anything about evil»

Who said anything about evil?

Instead, it seems that what Habakkuk is saying is that God, by not seeming to do anything about evil, appears to be looking upon evil with approval.

If God is all - powerful then he must be negligent in doing anything about evil.

Not exact matches

Re the christian and religion bashing, when are we going to realize that anyone can do about anything in the name of religion, from extreme evil to extreme charity.

This is all about control with religion and it has to stop.Gay people getting married doesn't have anything to do with straight people getting married.People are so full of hatred and disrespect it isn't funny.I'm glad this has come out now, because it really shows how evil people really are.But these people who are so into GOD, the Bible, Church, and the only way of life they live 4 god, by god are the 1s who prmote going around the world starting WARS, killing innocent women, men, children and families because Jesus guides them in everything they do.That is a crock of B.S. if I ever heard it.They will continus to use GOD and continue their EVIL ways to get whatever they want and CONTROL who ever they evil people really are.But these people who are so into GOD, the Bible, Church, and the only way of life they live 4 god, by god are the 1s who prmote going around the world starting WARS, killing innocent women, men, children and families because Jesus guides them in everything they do.That is a crock of B.S. if I ever heard it.They will continus to use GOD and continue their EVIL ways to get whatever they want and CONTROL who ever they EVIL ways to get whatever they want and CONTROL who ever they can.

Interestingly enough, nor in that book, nor in any other books I have read about the period, is it mentioned the fact that in the say 10 - 20 years following that moment, did this «evil church cult of the dammed rubble rubble rubble» engage in anything except spread the Word.

to ascribe anything but evil intent to the Pope's motives make one suspect that it is not one decision that is the real problem: it is really about the fact that the nature of Catholicism and the role of the Pope have at their core a claim so audacious as to provoke outrage.

It tells them not to be anxious about anything, for anxiety is the cause of all evil, but to bring everything to God in prayer.

What's evil about informing you that you haven't presented anything resembling a sensible post?

But people still obstinately keep asking questions about the whereabouts of departed loved ones, the meaning and purpose of their own lives, whether good will prevail over evil and whether we can know anything about the transcendent.

I know it sounds crazy but all I could think about was that whenever anything good came into my mind, I thought about how they called it evil and I was afraid that because of that, that I was doing it....

Jesus is indignant that the scribes and Pharisees (1) will not enter the kingdom of heaven themselves and stand in the way of others entering it as well; (2) will do almost anything to win a proselyte only to make that proselyte twice as much a child of hell as they are; (3) confuse people by senseless oaths, telling them that if they swear by the Temple, their oath is not binding, but if they swear by the gold of the Temple, it is binding - the fools ought to realize, Jesus says, that the Temple includes all that is in it; (4) tithe some of their money but neglect justice and mercy and faith, which are weightier moral matters, when they ought both to tithe and perform these greater acts of righteousness as well; (5) are careful about outward cleanliness but careless about the inward disposition, so that they are filled with extortion and greed; (6) appear righteous but really are hypocrites, because their appearance hides all manner of iniquity inside; (7) pretend to revere the prophets of history whom their parents killed but continue to practice the evil of their parents by rejecting those whom God sends to them now (Matt.

It also is the answer to life's tough questions, like why there is evil, and what, if anything, God is doing about it, and who is responsible for it, and what happens when we die, and is there life after death.

Our lord on Homosexuality In response to an item last month about the very bad argument that homosexuality must be OK because Jesus didn't say anything about it, our friend Gerry McDermott notes that Jesus did give his teaching on the matter, «albeit implicitly, when he condemned porneia (sexual sin) in Mark 7 as evil.

The sad one is what Rev. Moon apparently chose; the one at Matthew 24:48 about «that evil servant»; but Rev. Moon could have made it all to the crown of life: except for the fact he and all the members in the Unification Church tried to deny what I was told by my Angel when I was given the Word of God; yet Rev. Moon told everyone that the Word of God was where everything began and ended when dealing with anything in the Providence.

This is not to say that there is anything evil about working, as most persons must, to make a living for themselves and their families.

how come their is still no talk about Russia Orthodox church attacking freedom of expression by p4ss7 riot,... oh that's right because anything Christians do that's evil is left out of the MSM meanwhile their letting more Christians strip human right from people, your just going to let that country and their Christians get away with it,..

If you really think about it, ANYTHING can be considered «good» or «evil», from specific points - of - view.

If we learn anything about God from Jesus, it is that God does not commit violence, even to stop evil.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

In the words of Albert Einstein, «The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it.»

The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it.

Like a tiny dictator, he's probably silently laughing an evil laugh and thinking, «I can make mommy and daddy do just about anything when they are tired.»

If you are a medical researcher serious about your career you better not say anything that will go against conventional wisdom of «cholesterol is evil» otherwise your grants will be cut and you will never publish any thing ever again.

Nichols doesn't set out to preach to you about the evils of racism, the beauty of racial harmony, or anything of the sort.

The fact that Travolta's evil character seems unmotivated by anything but his macho rivalry with Slater is just about the only vestige of Woo's usual themes.

Peele says the evil purgatory works as a metaphor for being marginalized, and in the moments in which Chris is internally falling, he speaks volumes about the topical feelings surrounding suppression that many minorities face, without saying anything at all.

Ash vs. The Evil Dead After years of false starts and rumors about Sam Raimi and company getting the band back together for Evil Dead 4, it seemed unlikely that the world would ever be graced with Ashley J Williams presence on anything aside from the occasional limited comic book series again.

NB, Alfred Einstein's quote: «The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it» [xxvi].

We quickly discovered nothing about him had anything to do with James Bond, nor the evil character who was making nuclear weapons.

If you know anything about a recent horrendous attack on two American Pit Bull Terriers in Virginia you can help take an evil person or persons off the street and get a little money to spend on your own furbuddy.

I have always liked the quote by Albert Einstein, «The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it.»

Yeah it would be perfect on 3DS, which League of Evil is still coming to, but I knew hardly anything about the game and I never properly played it, but that soon changed.

Of course that does not give away anything, but in the discussion with the investors, the company was talking about Resident Evil related releases when they mentioned it.

The Evil Within 2 we haven't heard anything notable about although a sequel is generally expected — the first game being one that went down well.

Upon defeating Ganon, you're given total free reign of Hyrule, so you can go back and finish up anything you may have missed without worrying about Ganon's evil reign blighting the landscape.

However, fans have been dying to get an update on Resident Evil 2 Remake since besides the initial announcement, and that it is currently in development, we haven't heard anything about its progress.

And pretty amoral too, it'd take a Guild of Evil Scientist level of inhumanity to know about impending world destruction and swear a pact not to say anything.

Also, why say anything favorable about carbon taxes when cap - and - trade is dead and there's no longer even a weak prudential case for supporting carbon taxes as the lesser evil?

I hesitate to call this an «argument» in the video, since it mainly consists of using the words «Enron,» «bubble,» «Wall Street,» and «scam» suggestively, without saying anything at all specific about why this commodity market — which would be one of any number of commodity markets, most of which work perfectly well, including the carbon market in Europe — would be uniquely evil.