Sentences with phrase «anything about logic»

I have to tell you though, some of religious folks would be a very bad people if it wasn't for the «fear of god» as they already don't know anything about logic.

Not exact matches

There is no requirement of a certain level of knowledge about logic or arguments, just anything short of belief.

So, I guess I can understand the credulity of everyone who only understands what they're told and don't feel like learning anything about math or logic.

Lacking any evidence to support anything they believe about God, believers often resort to using some of the dumbest logic imaginable.

Arsenal conceded 36 goals last season, 1 more than Man United and Tottenham, hence by your logic those teams also need to strengthen at the back, and have not done anything worth talking about so far.

How come you didn't say anything about the two penalties that should have been given to ostersund in the first leg by your stupid logic.

; It will be the right and logic end of that story that will continue with Henry who can do same in a decade and do french team, as he would love to one day as Zidane does... Not about injuries nor referee nor anything but spirit in the team and club; confortable brats with daddy Wenger watching over them.

The intellectual groundwork for a truce about God was laid down long ago by 18th - century German philosopher Immanuel Kant and many others: Everyone who considers the matter carefully and honestly comes to the conclusion that you can't prove anything about God with science or logic.

Anime has always had a certain eccentricity about it (think of some of the stranger sequences in touchstone titles like Akira or Ghost in the Shell, or anything at the edges of the output of supposedly child - orientated Studio Ghibli), but the films which LEAFF selected to honour the medium's milestone take this eclectic, imaginative approach to storytelling to new levels, loosening the limits of the logic of reality, and travelling through the very fabric of space and time.

It may not have quite the same resonance as William Goldman's infamous line about the movie business — «nobody knows anything» — but Carolyn Reidy's comment, made at a recent Book Industry Study Group meeting held in New York, that «the more we know, the more we have to learn» is an excellent reminder that, as the redoubtable chief executive of Simon & Schuster Inc also noted, publishing has its own «peculiar logic».

Thanks CC, I appreciate the opportunity to discuss this as I find «educated» people are the hardest ones to communicate with about SM, they can use their knowledge (consciously or subconsciously) to duck and dodge what seems to me is the inescapable logic of the superiority of SM in the case of most people who are in position to do it (this I know not from technical analysis or anything, just looking at people who have as much or more income than I do, with similar expenses, but they have half the house or less and are going nowhere fast with their debt to asset ratio and their retirement savings are going to be inadequate if they don't change what they are doing).

Buffett didn't say anything about bonds, but the same logic should apply — only more so.

For if science is to be about anything it must be about the truth and in turn it must be about logic.

This is pretty much the position I start with about everything I hear; I have to claw my way through logic and reason and evaluation of my motivations step by step to come out in favor of anything.

Also, I'm sorry, but I'm not taking the IPCC's word on anything, particularly about testing of their circular logic models.

«Smokey»: You may well (as usual) have missed anything related to logic, facts, arguments, and three - syllable words, but I fully agree you deserve a laugh about my lack of html skills.

Using this logic, so far, no one has proven anything in the bible incorrect (though many have tried) but the same can not be said about many (if not all) of the man made religious books.