Not exact matches
The Enquirer, which endorsed Trump and has published negative stories
about his
opponents, has not published
anything about the affair, nor have any other American Media publications.
While the president attacks 99 percent of his
opponents by mercilessly strafing them in speeches, sound bites and tweets (and has a one - size - fits - all approach to firebombing Democrats, disobedient Republicans, Gold Star families, war heroes, etc.), Daniels fends off her online critics with self - deprecating humor, and has made a point of refraining from saying
anything bad
about the president himself — which has probably kept him from retaliating and going after her personally.
Romney has taken the time to inform himself
about the issues to the point that he can argue both sides of any issue better than most of his Republican
opponents can argue any side of
anything.
Some of those rules are: never say
anything positive
about your own position because it can be attacked, but chip away at what appear to be the weaknesses in your
opponent's position.
@Rufus «never say
anything positive
about your own position because it can be attacked, but chip away at what appear to be the weaknesses in your
opponent's position.»
«We know that if you want to deal well today with a Premier League
opponent the first thing you do is not look at the table, because that does not tell you
anything about the quality of your
opponent.
why did we play Welbeck in the striker's role... no one can question his heart but to have a player with such limited first - touch and finishing skills against such a game
opponent with Lacazette on the bench is almost unforgivable... maybe it's because Welbeck tows the party line or maybe it's because Welbeck doesn't know
anything but 100 % on the pitch, unfortunately neither of these qualities makes him a capable starting striker on a team with any real aspirations... I can only hope that he was being showcased for a move elsewhere, as there was some talk last week
about some interest from Everton... if he moved on that would be the only silver lining of this coach's decision, but once again it wouldn't excuse this club for putting business decisions ahead of fielding the best possible team to secure 3 points at Anfield
If there's
anything the 2017 season has taught us, it's not to try to be clever
about schedule and
opponent strength so much in advance... Honestly: who would have thought this time last year that our tough games would be vCHI and @JAX, and games like @CIN, @OAK and @GB would be easy cruising?
Whatever the Blazers knew
about their
opponent hardly mattered; they never did
anything about it.
If Wolves replicate any of their three performances talked
about in the above preview, during their victories over Liverpool and Chelsea or even in defeat to Man City last weekend, then it's difficult to envisage
anything other than a home win for Wolves, what with their
opponents, Liverpool, having won just once away from home all season and just twice in the last twelve months.
Asked why he was thought Rice would be a better representative than Blakeman on issues related to Israel and other international conflicts, Schumer said: «I'm not going to say
anything negative
about the
opponent... But I know Kathleen and I know that she will be a voice that people really listen to.
People lump together on the right anyone from staunchly anti-religious «sex maniac» Ayn Rand to «Family Values» Christian fundamentalists some of whom literally wouldn't agree with Randian Objectivists
about anything other than statists / Communists being a common
opponent.
If we have learnt
anything about David Cameron, in recent months it is that he is a masterful tactician, able to run rings round his two main Westminster
opponents, Nick Clegg and Ed Miliband.
Picente did not say
anything negative in his statement
about his Democratic
opponent, incumbent AG Eric Schneiderman.
«Sad and unfortunate» were vintage Pataki administration responses to
anything political and / or negative
about the then - governor said by a critic or
opponent; I can't count the number of times I wrote «sad and unfortunate» while covering that administration for the TU).
Loosely (extremely loosely), the media is hugely left - wing (leaving aside the point I agree with that left / right is a highly imprecise and largely meaningful term); and therefore
anything the media says
about the right - including calling Nazism «right» - is aimed not at some universal truth but at scoring political points against their
opponents.
Cuomo, in Shnayerson's telling, was the young campaign operative who shimmied up telephone poles in Queens in the dead of night to take down his father Mario's
opponent's campaign posters, and would do just
about anything if it meant winning.
If Star Wars: Episode 3 taught us
anything, it's that having the high ground means «it's over» and your
opponent is
about to lose some limbs — it's often the same case in Nidhogg 2.
One would think Wegman is running for Congress and his incumbent
opponent knows the voters are
about to boot his keister out, so why not accuse the new guy of everything and
anything in hopes the voters will turn against the «extremist».