Zimmer: We do hardly know
anything about genes that have to do with intelligence and what -LSB-'s] surprising is that this ignorance is taking place even when we have really sophisticated tools.
Not exact matches
It helps us to understand how a particular
gene, Ras, functions in the presence of sugar, but it doesn't say is
anything about sugar giving people cancer.
Dr. Seyfried and Dominic D'Agostino aren't making that argument either, but I think what they bring to this is a fresh perspective that in many ways if it's true, it can be more empowering for people that are dealing with cancer, and the risk of cancer, because it offers a lever for intervention and treatment above and beyond just the idea that «Oh, I have bad
genes and there's not really
anything I can do
about it.»
You know, if anybody's read
anything about red wine and Resveratrol, they'll know
about the Sirtuin
genes, originally discovered by a — you know, a guy — a brilliant uh — scientist out of a Harvard Medical School back
about —
about 20 years ago.
Dr. Sajad Zalzala: You know, if anybody's read
anything about red wine and Resveratrol, they'll know
about the Sirtuin
genes, originally discovered by a — you know, a guy — a brilliant uh — scientist out of a Harvard Medical School back
about —
about 20 years ago.
Of course, we can't do
anything about your own
genes.
Do physical features reliably say
anything informative
about a person's genetic makeup beyond indicating that the individual has
genes for blue eyes or curly hair?
If we have truly learned
anything about genetics while painting our
gene bank, it is how to create a masterpiece that can be reliably reproduced.