Sentences with phrase «anything about the global climate»

Joshua might a point because before Climategate with both houses controlled by dems and with the Dem President, Obama, who promised he would stop the rising ocean, they didn't pass laws to do anything about global climate.

Though a 1 C rise in global temperature may not tell us anything about global climate - temperature is not really something which effect humans or life, whereas patterns rainfall, would be more relevant than average global temperature.

Have you heard anything about the global climate data cited in this editorial that just came out - or what would you say to this argument against global warming?

Not exact matches

We're talking about massive damages if we didn't do anything,» said Jochen Hinkel, a senior researcher at the Global Climate Forum and a co-author of the paper.

Sure, global warming is real, said participants in a recent climate change conference, but that doesn't mean we should do anything about it.

Climate Change Week or anything you need to know about global warming and climate Climate Change Week or anything you need to know about global warming and climate climate change.

[Response: I suspect another common confusion here: the abrupt glacial climate events (you mention the Younger Dryas, but there's also the Dansgaard - Oeschger events and Heinrich events) are probably not big changes in global mean temperature, and therefore do not need to be forced by any global mean forcing like CO2, nor tell us anything about the climate sensitivity to such a global forcing.

Could anything be more out of date, backward - looking, or antiquated in spirit than the Carlin report's repackaging of yesterday's denialist illusions and pseudoscientific nonsense about climate — fantasies that have been shot down time and again, that don't have a melting Greenland glacier's chance in a warming climate when exposed to the light of reason, yet which have been presented to the world as if they were a brilliant refutation of the CO2 - global warming link by the sharpest analytical minds in the field of climatological research?

Your comments in this first blog about Sarah Palin and global climate change confirms you don't undertand anything about geoscience and how the Earth works as a complete system.

«All too often climate change is either not addressed at all, or when it is addressed, it's sort of dismissed as «Well it's cold today, I guess global warming isn't anything we should be worried about,»» he observed.

These scientists (and, for that matter, anyone with a public profile who has anything critical to say about global warming) are whores — «industry shills», «corporate toadies», or part of the «well funded denial machine» — who not only prostitute themselves, but also sell us all out to an apocalypse for dirty, dirty dollars... Those who «deny» climate change are in fact, denying a «holocaust ``.

«[The subjects raised] made for a decent scientific debate 15 years ago, but the questions have since been settled... The Great Global Warming Swindle raised old debates that are going to be latched on to and used to suggest that we don't need to do anything about climate change.

And when Obama approval rating drops and has no ability to pass anything, Obama talks about the global climate.

Not one of them tell us anything about any physically real global climate state.

Regardless of what you think about CO2, global warming, or climate change, this is a disaster that may make anything in the past pale in comparison and I'm all for whatever will stop this.

However, I am not persuaded there is anything unusual about the global temperatures of climate.

I do not believe that tree ring proxies tell us anything about the impact of a global industrial high - tech civilisation (which is transferring more than one hundred billions tonnes of pure carbon from the ground to the atmosphere every decade), and the effects of this on the world's climate and ecosystems.

The next time you read some horrific article about how global warming is going to make the sea - level rise, cause droughts, floods, and just about anything else you can name including 3 - eyed cows and cooties, remember that the climate model used to predict it is crap.

If you've ever wondered exactly why the global coal industry has argued so vehemently — first against the science of climate change and secondly against doing anything about it — the International Energy Agency lays it all out in its latest World Energy Outlook.

The people facing the worst impacts of climate change have virtually no voice in western debates about whether to do anything serious to prevent catastrophic global warming.

Worst idea: 2009 seems to have been the year that global warming deniers shifted from claiming that climate disruption is a hoax to claiming that climate disruption is too big and too far along to stop, so there's no point in doing anything about it.

Climate Depot response to Revkin: «Andy, I don't «put out stuff that says we don't know anything about global warming.»

Anything that might appear to discredit and «damage» the notion that there is a consensus on global warming, aka climate change, among all scientists must of necessity be a scary notion to «the team,» since their whole agenda is to promote the idea that there is no question about its total acceptance among scientists.

It is like global warmers don't know anything about climate.

Why do you think that the vice president's office wanted to downplay — even in EPA reports — anything that talked about global warming and climate change?

To quote Elizabeth Economy from last August, «Whether we're talking about food and product safety, or environmental implementation of anything China might agree to when it comes to global climate change, or trade and investment barriers and intellectual property rights protection, all of them hinge on China having an effective rule of law.

(The global climate has sadly refused all such efforts at intimidation, stubbornly refusing to do anything the Church of Global Warming predicted it would do, but evidently that's not much of a problem for the new politicized «science» if everyone is afraid to talk abouglobal climate has sadly refused all such efforts at intimidation, stubbornly refusing to do anything the Church of Global Warming predicted it would do, but evidently that's not much of a problem for the new politicized «science» if everyone is afraid to talk abouGlobal Warming predicted it would do, but evidently that's not much of a problem for the new politicized «science» if everyone is afraid to talk about it.)

Everyone interested in global warming climate change 7 maths and physics should read about «Climate as a random walk» as a model fit its much much better than anythinclimate change 7 maths and physics should read about «Climate as a random walk» as a model fit its much much better than anythinClimate as a random walk» as a model fit its much much better than anything else.

Back in the olden days, in the days when they had the sort of «stable» climate we are all now expected to aspire to, long before anyone had thunk up global warming or anything, they used to amuse themselves of an evening by singing about how natural variability is always going to happen whether the models be right or wrong.

(134) Other chances to mention global climate change came in stories about heat waves, floods, and coastal storms, especially when the events were more damaging than anything in recent memory.

It's a global model so it doesn't tell us anything about climate equity or the distribution of mitigation efforts, wealth or improved lifestyles.

but when the overwhelming majority of climate scientists agrees on that anthropogenic global warming was real («the consensus») then this doesn't prove anything about the reality of AGW.

«This is dead - serious business,» wrote climate activist and 350.org founder Bill McKibben in his initial «call to arms» back in May, «a signal moment in the gathering fight of human beings to do something about global warming before it's too late to do anything but watch.»

Amateur theories about global warming are a dime a dozen and, unfortunately, that can make it hard for the general public and policy makers to figure out what's based on sound science and what has just been made up in 5 minutes by someone who doesn't know anything about climate science.

Which drives home once again: Don't even think about getting your hopes of for anything resembling a global climate agreement.

All of which is a longer version of what President Clinton glibly said during the Clinton Global Initiative in September: The current US inaction on climate, the denial of the science, and unwillingness to meaningfully even discuss doing anything about it all, means the US increasingly looks like a fool in the international community.