Sentences with phrase «anything about the history»

If you know anything about the history of the bible you know it was created by many writers, compiled and edited by Roman emperors, added to, translated, interpreted and actually pretty much ignored — except for a few sentences that sound old fashioned that people use to justify their beliefs and actions.

You are using religious in two different senses, and you're using one sense of the term to support your claim that no one knows anything about the history of their own religion or others.

and if this judge knew anything about history she would know that the term messiah was used years before Jesus walked the earth.

Do you know anything about the history of Arsenal Football Club.

Andrew Robert Rector, the fan filing the suit, is apparently claiming that the broadcasters implied that he «is a fatty cow that need two seats at a time» and «is a confused individual that neither understands nor knows anything about history or the meaning of rivalry between Red Sox and Yankees.»

If you know anything about the history of the Cuban link chain, you know it has stood the test of time better than many other fad necklace styles out there.

So truthfully, I can't and I won't tell you anything about the history of hair in general — as the caption of this article might let you to believe — but what I will do is tell you a little more about the history of mine, and hopefully help you getting to your «perfect» hair sooner than I did...

(Disclaimers: When it comes to the NFL debacle, we don't know anything about the history of the ball, so this blog is just for educational purposes.

We don't know anything about her history or how she came by the injury to her leg but we welcome the chance to give her a much brighter future.

Folks have said that Battlefield Hardline doesn't say anything about the history of police violence and excessive force.

For «Imagined Landscapes,» Duval - Carrié studied artworks from the 19th Century and earlier depicting the New World's lush Caribbean, sometimes by artists who knew little if anything about the history of places they described.

If there's anything about history we have come to know it's that in order to not repeat the past, we must pay close atte...

Secondly, if the potential reader does know anything about the history of the so - called hockey stick debate, that reader will fall into one of two camps:

If you know anything about the history of science, you'll know how much credit goes to someone who overturns a major theory or consensus.

Not exact matches

But if our history of profligacy has taught us anything, it's that Canada can't afford to be complacent about the country's more than $ 500 - billion debt.

The way I think about the markets goes something like this: the future is always unknowable, history is a pretty good guide, you have to take the present into account, but anything is possible so expect the unexpected.

However, if Bitcoin's own history is anything to go by, then chances are it's going to be a different tech altogether — something that's NOT sexy right now, something that does NOT receive a lot of attention in the media, something that most people do NOT know about.

They may say that modern (or postmodern) thought has «moved beyond» what Aquinas, for instance, had to say about the interaction of nature and history, but in fact they typically have not the foggiest notion of what Aquinas said, or even whether he said anything at all on the subject.

I did after examining many religions, too many to list but after being so discouraged about the subject I decided to give them a chance and could not find anything that could not be backed up by the Bible history and archeology as well as the false religions that have misled so many.

Or for that matter, what has he ever done about anything at any time in history.

Do they really never read anything about American history?

Yeah, well if history has taught us anything about the Pope.

... i know your book says don't believe anything else before or after to protect its place in history, but just as you would read greek mythology and have incredulous thoughts about multigods ruling the earth water and the undergrounds, those who are not stuck on your wavelength, read your mythology and think how anyone in their right minds could ever fall for those idolatric stories... your belief in your creationist god is as unfathomable as an adult looking up the chimney and feeling the power of Santa Clause in them... does the power of Santa Clause compel you?

When else in the history of the Church would anyone care what a happy - clappy bleeding - heart mum from western Canada thinks about anything?

If we are to speak truly to our age, therefore, we can assume, not (1) the complete ignorance of Christian principles, such as existed in the decaying civilization of early Greece and Rome; (2) the thoroughgoing knowledge and acceptance of Christian principles, such as existed in the time of most of our grandparents; or (3) the vigorous antagonism to the gospel, such as now exists among those who accept either the Marxist or the Fascist interpretation of history; but (4) a vague and tenuous residuum of Christian piety, devoid of any intention of doing anything about it.

Strictly speaking, I have no right to feel anything at all about the way the Church is going, and no right either to remember as much ecclesiastical history as I do or to buy and read paperbacks on theology.

Nor have I anything to say about cultures or peoples who have not suffered the history of faith and disenchantment we have, or who do not share our particular relation to European antiquity or the heritage of ancient Christendom.

Gutting does not think it incumbent on a Catholic to believe anything in particular about history or metaphysics.

Of coruse, if you knew anything about your own countries history, you wouldn't have made such a stupid coment.

Please don't listen to these people on here they have so many different views and ideas of their own but don't listen to them they have closed their heart to God and are doing Satans work of misleading people away from the Almighty they look for men who like to have their ears tickled so don't take mine our anyone else's word for it look it up for your self history attests to the bible as true and The writings of Moses is far older than anything they have ever found thats right Moses wrote the first parts in the bible 3,500 years ago The scriptures weren't inspired by Pagan stories Pagan stories was inspired by actual events just like those in the bible because if you notice that a lot of the stories found in the bible have a lot to do about people worshipping false Gods.

If they knew anything about religious history they would know these things.

Jesus is indignant that the scribes and Pharisees (1) will not enter the kingdom of heaven themselves and stand in the way of others entering it as well; (2) will do almost anything to win a proselyte only to make that proselyte twice as much a child of hell as they are; (3) confuse people by senseless oaths, telling them that if they swear by the Temple, their oath is not binding, but if they swear by the gold of the Temple, it is binding - the fools ought to realize, Jesus says, that the Temple includes all that is in it; (4) tithe some of their money but neglect justice and mercy and faith, which are weightier moral matters, when they ought both to tithe and perform these greater acts of righteousness as well; (5) are careful about outward cleanliness but careless about the inward disposition, so that they are filled with extortion and greed; (6) appear righteous but really are hypocrites, because their appearance hides all manner of iniquity inside; (7) pretend to revere the prophets of history whom their parents killed but continue to practice the evil of their parents by rejecting those whom God sends to them now (Matt.

I am a well trained Physicist and I know about the history of the earth with evidences from [Geo] chemistry, physics, biology and the like and yet know that they all have holes and are «not proofs» of anything

Well actually, this guy, if you really knew your history, there were HUGE fights after the death of Jesus, (who, curiously enough NEVER called himself «the Christ»), between the Jerusalem community, (which had many EYE WITNESSES in it), and Paul, (who NEVER met, nor heard Jesus say anything), about what was the meaning of those events.

Jessica Robertson, history student at the University of Hull, giving her personal testimony about her devotion to the Eucharist - «Adoration really gives you the strength to do anything, as does Mass..

If you discount one account of history, you have to be cynical about all accounts and not believe anything.

If these two can't agree on the very beginning of the history of Jesus, how can we believe anything else they tell us about him?

Second, I suggest that the talk about «resurrection of the body» is an assertion that the totality of the material world and of human history, as well as of every man in that history who, with his brethren, has achieved good in his existence in the world, is usable by God who through it has been enriched in His own experience without changing in His supremely worshipful deity — the God unsurpassable by anything not Himself, but open to enrichment in being what He is and in terms of what He does.

If you'll permit me to leave this thought: I have concluded after many years of «church hopping» to finally «no church» that what we need in the «church» is not anything «new» as stated in your last paragraph but rather a «liberation from»... I conclude that the church (organized or free) considers this return to liberty (brought about by Christ) as a legitimate «next step» in the history of «church» but that is firstly a lie and secondly opens up a door for even more destructive creativity by humans.

Anyone who knows anything about fermentation or history will tell you that it is a lie, yet I still have heard pastors make the remark often.

We spent the rest of the afternoon and evening talking about anything and everything, and the rest is history!

Is there anything you know about the history behind these cookies?

And everything about them, recent club history, manager, fans says we want to win major trophies and will do anything to get that done, they have a winners DNA and we have lost that.)

Does history tell us anything about how the Dodgers will fare?

The thing about Shane as an impartial referee, though, is that his history suggests he's anything but in that role, and he's got historic beef with both Owens and Styles.

«Look at them, they don't even know anything about the sport, the team, the pain, the history.»

What about Pochetino, he has never won anything and had more chances than us to get above leic also he hasn't got previous history or helped with the move in the way Wenger would have given his two cents also hasn't got a first PL team going for FA cup treble.

We are taken about a team that has not won anything since league cups in 2008, that only won i think 2 EPL their history.

but knock yourself out, go on BLINDLY and IGNORANTLY backing the gobbiest ex player in Arsenal's history, a publicly admitted Crystal Palace supporter who rarely has anything nice to say about Arsenal... Just because he was a prolific goalscorer and record holder (Glory hunter mentality).

... until you realize that in his history, he's seldom had anything good to say about Smith.