Sentences with phrase «anything about those characters»

I didn't see anything about his character that deserves the hype and praise he has received thus far.

We don't really know anything about their characters, but the basic setup of the show is that it's an anthology series where each episode is about a different person in the present day who believes that they're descended from the Romanoffs, the former Russian royal family who were (supposedly) all killed off by the Bolsheviks in 1918.

McAdams didn't say anything about the character itself, and Marvel Studios has not commented on McAdams» claims.

While I don't know anything about the character other than the fact that she is a Russian spy, I am pretty sure these images are going to get a lot of people even more excited about the movie.

The general problem with War is that its metaphors are empty and do not say anything about the characters in the picture.

By contrast, Mission: Impossible is a spy caper, and by design it is more concerned with the nuts - and - bolts of convoluted espionage plots than anything about the characters.

I.e.. For a moment, I assumed that everyone, not just pantsers, would want to not lie or hide anything about their characters, haha.

And if you know anything about those characters, you know that we absolutely had to make a talking goat!

If anything about the character «gets in the way» of feeding the hungry masses with Michael Bay-esque stuff... we're gonna freakin'tramp all over it in a heart beat».

There is nothing in Steve's writings to suggest that he was accusing anybody of malpractice, if anything he commented on the rational for the selection of the cores without implying anything about the character of Briffa with regards to the study.

Not exact matches

My colleague, Kirsten, had to sign an NDA promising she wouldn't reveal anything about Smith's character ahead of the film release in order to receive a making - of book on the film.

If you are concerned about Muslims — or anybody else — not being willing to abide by American principles and the Constitution, is there anything else we can do to prevent this, beyond the Draconian and character - destroying (our character and theirs) discussion of deportation or internment camps.

That more than anything, I think, says something about Tony's character.

So, friend, your conception about God, His character and His nature is not correct, and is not based on anything He reveals about Himself.

So if what Jesus said to Philip can't be used to teach us about the nature and character of God because it's historical narrative, then this same argument applies to every text in the Bible, and you can also not use anything from the Law, the Writings, the Prophets, the Gospels, or the Epistles.

It is not possible, in general, to infer anything important about other physical qualities, character, emotional traits, personal habits, knowledge, or skills.

Anything in your book written about what jesus did or said were written decades after the jesus character was said to have lived.

However, the fact that we can't know everything about God should not lead to the conclusion that we can't know anything about God and therefore shouldn't try to understand his character and his world better.

Anything else ever written about your storybook character jesus was written by people in the same deluded cult as you are.

You can use just about anything — even a visible character like» -» as in se - x.

It is not saying anything about a gay relationship between biblical characters.

but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..

Twenty - one years later, more a statement about his character than anything else.

In fact, Ozil's response tells us a lot about his character more than anything.

Statement is baffling and is in fact the very thing that guys like cap and others are fighting against the truth is Colin didn't orignaly kneel during the anthem he sat on his bench he was then approached by vets who asked why he was sitting and asked him to do something else because sitting was disprectful it was those army vets who told cap to kneel because it shows your fighting against something and not just sitting to sit they told him it would be a better look and it's funny how people turn around and say he is disrespecting the very people who told him what to do and how to do it to get his message across this is the ignorance of America and everything cap fights against you judge a man by the color of his skin and his upbringing and not the content of his character you don't know anything about cap yet you pull this entire story out your ass go sit down clown

I was very careful not to say anything about Mike Schmidt's character, because I don't know the man and that's not really relevant.

I'm ruling out Keita right off the bat not because I have anything against him personally, but because there's something about his demeanor that makes me think he doesn't quite have the personality / character to succeed at Juve.

Anything less than four will have a better than expected feel about it but I fear it will be worse, particularly with the lack of character and leadership on the field.

There has never been anything remotely big - time about Stevie's character.

The holidays are not about the flashiest toy, the latest movie character, the new electronic device or ANYTHING with a screen on it.

Baby names can be inspired from just about anything and anyone, and what better way to pay tribute to your favourite Netflix show or character than by taking a little «namespiration».

The book doesn't so much delve into that and I had more questions about how, but one thing it discusses is the helicopter - parented child who never has to figure anything out for himself, gets to college and after college and doesn't really know how to make things happen because he's never been given the opportunity / challenge or had certain character traits instilled.

This 100 % in line with anything so far known about Trump, and definitely not an earth shattering revelation about his character or tactics (remember the kerfuffle about GOP nomination acceptance vs. 3d party run if he loses the primaries?).

For you to vote for Mr. Weiner who has shown he lacks character and self control says more about the low expectations of New Yorkers than anything else.

Ask a person you meet what work they will do, if they can choose anything, and you will be able to know more about the character and personality.

This is about the characters and themes more than anything.

In one, Deanna's fear of speaking in front of a class, completely unmotivated by anything we know about her character up to that point, causes her to regress from sweaty - pit dread to phlegmatic panic to total, collapsing bodily rejection.

In one of the strongest scenes in this final film, a character tells Harry about the importance of words and how things that exist only in the mind are as real as anything else.

Walt Disney with his early shorts of singing and dancing bunnies or skeletons; Tim Burton with his Jack Skellington and Sally in «The Nightmare Before Christmas»; Nick Park with his man - and - dog team in «Wallace and Gromit» and his prisoner - fowl in «Chicken Run»; Chuck Jones with just about anything — there's a long and varied list of individuals who have imbued cartoon characters with bottomless expressiveness without the help of anything as sophisticated as DreamWorks» Express - o - matic (or whatever it's called).

One noticeable issue about this movie is that it forces us to feel sad for characters we don't even learn anything about or are on screen for one scene.

Except for Grand Moff Tarkin, who was basically a bunch of Peter Cushing - shaped pixels, none of the major players were people we knew; most of them were characters we'd never heard of, the grunts and redshirts of the galactic war, and that meant anything could happen to them, and that the film didn't have to set aside a certain amount of space for enacting things we'd heard about but never seen dramatized.

Although Viola Davis offers a fantastic performance here, this disgusting melodrama is much more concerned about making you cry than saying anything meaningful, while most of the characters are one - dimensional and several unnecessary details are constantly added to the story with the sole purpose of cheap sentimentality.

And I have to confess that while the characters are generally amusing (insofar as they're utilized — the monkey and snake barely do anything), I don't care that much about them.

Rarely does so much talking say so little: Even after 30 - plus minutes of shocking pronouncements and sweeping exposition, no explanation has been offered for why we should care about any of these characters or anything that happens to them.

I'm a huge Aaron Sorkin fan (ever since The West Wing), but because this movie has an utterly unlikable protagonist it's difficult to care about anything that happens to her — no matter how clever the banter between characters.

I am frustrated by the lack of modern - or future - set films without strong female characters, but I'm aware that, historically speaking, women haven't been given much training in warfare or an equal share of about anything.

As for Johnson's character, he's a San Diego - based primatologist named Davis Okoye, who seems capable of doing just about anything that the movie requires him to do.

If there is anything I didn't like about the film, it's Cameron's lack of realism when dealing with the roles of children, especially Jonathan Lipnicki's (Stuart Little, The Little Vampire) character as the boy that Maguire forms a bond with, as he's too unrealistic in demeanor and too strange looking to buy as a real kid, and for that matter the same goes for Tyson Tidwell's (Suarez, The Ladykillers) demeanor (son of Rod) as well.

At the convention on Sunday (16.07.17), Benicio also kept tight lipped about his character and didn't give anything away.

Did you discover anything new about the character that surprised you?