God's is not the power to do
anything at all.
Our derangedly open desires can be directed to
anything at all.
Is there
anything at all analogous to this in pre-human evolution?
I've never seen anyone say so much without saying
anything at all.
Saying a whole lot without saying
anything at all.
Can even a «renewed» mind, full of the same old repetitive compulsive automatic stream of thinkety - think - think ever change
anything at a depth level?
«As far as music goes, we couldn't listen to
anything at all,» Followill says.
Why would god say
anything at all to nonbelievers except, «Isn't it a good thing I forgave you»?
Modern war makes all judgments of better or worse pointless in comparison with the primordial «to be or not to be» which determines whether there shall be
anything at all to appraise.
Has any of your thoughts ever changed
anything at a depth level?
It's amazing that Paul had the nerve to stand up and say
anything at all.
So what is the point of preying or doing
anything at all?
You have no evidence that the removal of forced prayer in schools caused
anything at all, you dolt.
I'm so inclined to be able to learn
anything at all from you.
Jung did NOT have much of
anything at all to do with the origins of AA.
Beliefs regarding God concern the source and end of all reality, the unity and existence of every particular thing and of the totality of all things, the ground of the possibility of
anything at all.
The bad news for believers, if there is any, is surely the failure of the more sober scholars to reach a consensus on the historical Jesus: if they agree on
anything at all, it is that the Gospels can not be taken for historical or biographical accounts of what the Jesus of history said, did and suffered.
Did I tell you to do or not do
anything at all?
Leo, do you know
anything at all about religion?
It's not a disbelief in
anything at all.
If we can say
anything at all about God with any degree of assurance, it surely would be that he is lovingly concerned with the totality of his creation, no matter how different and opposed the other parts may be to us and to our interests.
Plus I started questioning that this whole «creation'thing just doesn't go along with anything, and I mean
anything at all.
There is not much on gay coitus in the NT, and if you ignore all but the gospels, there really isn't
anything at all (in the NT).
If you have heart disease, you have to choose what to do; it's rare to have to choose, until the very end, whether you want to do
anything at all.
The whirligig of everyday events often means that we don't see
anything at all.
For things like what is a «soul» (if that exists), or what happens after death (if
anything at all), that's well within the realm of religion and philosophy.
We are also, likewise, to be «indifferent»; that is, free enough to flourish in either place; to do
anything at all that is ad majorem Dei gloriam, for the greater glory of God.
Hence, as an answer to the question of why there is and continues to be
anything at all, creativity can not play in Whitehead's philosophy quite the role prime matter plays in Aristotle.
I don't even feel I've got
anything at all from the teacher - there is no guidance, recognition for hard work or anything.
If there is no objective meaning, then the text no longer says
anything at all; without existential appropriation, what the text does say is no longer living speech.
Is there
anything at all in the Bible that is meant to be taken literally?
First of all, you didn't say
anything at all about the fact that not all marriages occur in Churches.
Sometimes, in painful situations, it is better to not say
anything at all, then to try to comfort those who are grieving only to offend or hurt them further.
None of you support
anything at all.
Netanyahu will expand
anything at any price to appease his political coalition.
However, if one asks why it is that there is
anything at all, the answer must be that prime matter is eternal and demands some form.
Certainly Aristotle never intended to raise the question as to why there is
anything at all.
This rejection of the radical question as to why there is
anything at all is also characteristic of Whitehead.
But if there is
anything at the heart of the Scriptures, it's growing up and growing in maturity to where you're learning how to discern things yourself.
Do you know
anything at all besides your fear of brown people?
You say so much without saying
anything at all.
Then, do they really know
anything at all about Jesus?
I do not have to have faith to be an atheist, I simply don't have to have
anything at all.
I found that they said very little about it, if
anything at all.
If you are afraid of saying the wrong thing, don't say
anything at all.
«When Americans are able to live by their convictions, to speak openly of their faith, and to teach their children what is right, our families thrive, our communities flourish, and our nation can achieve
anything at all.»
Before I go on to consider Abraham's last word more closely I would call attention to the difficulty Abraham had in saying
anything at all.
Sort of get the impression that «if you can't say anything ugly don't say
anything at all!»
But how does an event, insofar as it becomes
anything at all, become something which is distinct from others?
That being said, it would never occur to me to post anything other than an expression of sympathy regarding the death of his son (if I were moved to post
anything at all regarding the tragic death of a young man whom I never knew but must have been in incredible pain).