Sentences with phrase «anything changes in terms»

We'll be sure to follow up within the week to see if anything changes in terms of extensions.

Not exact matches

That «suggests that a long - term character change could be afoot, which makes me suspicious of anything more than a bounce for now,» he added in comments to CNBC.

That long - term data shows that modern climate change is faster and more acute than anything else in Earth's history.

The Warriors are not about to try different lineups, put a big on LeBron, or change much of anything in terms of x's and o's.

What today's changes do not do is provide any indications that Facebook plans to do anything different in terms of what information it's gathering and using to run its service, and its bigger, profitable business.

I think when there is a whole comprehensive real understanding of what renewables can provide as a viable long - term energy source, over the long term I don't see anything that changes the demand profile for solar in particular over the next 5 - 10 years.

It does not mean that anything has changed in terms of the theological and ecclesial distance between the Catholic Church and Pentecostal or evangelical ecclesial bodies.

Second, I suggest that the talk about «resurrection of the body» is an assertion that the totality of the material world and of human history, as well as of every man in that history who, with his brethren, has achieved good in his existence in the world, is usable by God who through it has been enriched in His own experience without changing in His supremely worshipful deity — the God unsurpassable by anything not Himself, but open to enrichment in being what He is and in terms of what He does.

Few months back I considered myself a rabid AOB sort of a Piers Morgan type, after some time I came to terms with myself that nothing was going to change, it did not matter my tirades or how many comments would post, things at ARSENAL would not change, our destiny is intertwine with AW till the day he decides is enough for him or his Contract is over, for sure not before that, SO there is no point anymore in pointing AW deficiencies nor trashing the Man, he reached the top of his abilities and is consistent with that, making the top 4 reaching the last 16 at the CL and as a BONUS last year maybe this one the FA Cup, reality is he will not reach anything more and we just have to settle and accept (as he has done) our STATUS QUO a good team but not good enough........

whatever was done «to him» with Costanza didn't change anything in the long term, no?

Obviously you lead the team out and do the coin toss before the game, but in terms of my game I don't think anything has changed.

If your goal is to end your birth story with a healthy baby, a healthy mother, after the least amount of danger and discomfort in labor possible, then being able to labor on your own couch becomes meaningless in terms of control when you know how little doing so actually changes anything.

Yet, despite this proliferation of new and important constitutional ideas they are routinely given scant consideration by the government of the day in terms of actually changing anything.

«Nothing EPA presented suggests anything has changed since August of last year — the science remains inconclusive in terms of data, impact, and source,» Hock wrote.

If this is true, then the human consequences are much more acute than anything we've seen with climate change, in terms of hunger.

Health improvement (allowing to post - pone / escape the diseases and thus live, healthier / disease - free longer, but not above human MLSP of around 122 years; thus these therapies do not affect epigenetic aging whatsoever, they are degenerative aging problems not regular healthy aging problem (except OncoSENS - only when you Already Have Cancer - which cancer increases epigenetic aging, but cancer removal thus does not change anything / makes no difference about what happens in the other cells / about what happens in the normal epigenetic «aging» course in Normal non-cancerous healthy cells) Although there is not such thing as «healthy aging» all aging in «unhealthy» (as seen from elders who are «healthy enough» who show much damage), it's just «tolerable / liveable» enough (in terms of damage accumulating) that it does not affect their quality of life (enough yet), that is «healthy aging»: ApoptoSENS - Clearing Senescent Cells (this will have great impact to reduce diseases, the largest one, since it's all inflammation fueled by the inflammation secretory phenotype (SASP) of these senescent cells) AmyloSENS - Dissolving the Plaques (this will allow humans to evade Alzheimer's, Parkinsons and general brain degenerescence, allowing quite a boost; making people much more easily reach the big 100 - since the brain is causal to how long we live; keeping brain amyloid - free and keeping our memories / neuron sharp / means longer LongTerm Potentiation - means longer brain function means longer heavy brain mass (gray matter / white matter retention seen in «sharp - witted» Centenarians who show are younger brain for their age), and both are correlated to MLSP).

There was one study that showed a rise in DHEA after people consumed creatine, and DHEA is sometimes correlated with hair loss, but short - term spikes in hormonal levels have very little relevance to long - term changes in, well, anything.

«Because of metabolic adaptations to prolonged changes in diet composition, the results of such short - term studies can not be applied to longer - term situations... Although more long - term studies are needed before a firm conclusion can be drawn, it appears, from most literature studied, that a VLCARB is, if anything, protective against muscle protein catabolism during energy restriction, provided that it contains adequate amounts of protein.»

Should I even bother with worrying about MAF or changing anything in the interim, or are there simple things I could do that can improve things that won't create short term issues?

It is not a life changing occurrence or a film that reveals anything in terms of unlocking the mysteries of the human experience.

For the moment, the automaker isn't spelling out what sort of updates will come in terms of cabin and safety technology, but the outgoing truck already features available Apple CarPlay and Android Auto integration, a 4G LTE Wi - Fi hotspot and wireless charging, and there's no reason to expect that to change for anything but the better.

In terms of size, style, design, attention to detail, performance and quality, the Aurora mirrors the best characteristics of European and Japanese luxury cars.The Aurora's V - 8, which drives the front wheels, develops 250 of the smoothest and most refined horses your money can buy.And like that Cadillac engine, you won't have to do anything to maintain it but change the oil and filters for the first 100,000 miles.The Aurora is not a car that you would call fast.

Hamlet would start seeing a counsellor — perhaps Polonius, who dabbles in the self - help industry himself, would recommend someone — and come to terms with his bereavement and realise that it's OK for his mother to have sex with her new husband (although there'd be no «rank sweat of an enseamed bed» or anything icky like that) and he'd go back to university happy, having now accepted the change in his family circumstances, with Ophelia in tow.

Second, would I be short - changing myself in terms of readership, potential agent attention, etc., if I don't include any biographical information or reveal anything about the author to the readers, but keep my content in a more general perspective, i.e. about the book itself or content related to the story?

The white Nexus 7 doesn't add anything in terms of new features - quite simply it's just a colour change.

I have not noticed anything new in terms of API's or anything like that but RIM has kindly put up a change log.

Hi John - thank you again for your recent response to my earlier letter... I believe I read somewhere on the site that you are a retired engineer, so let me speak for a second in math terms... more of a hypothesis than anything empirical yet, but it SEEMS to me that the partial derivative of the «ideal» stock allocation (let's assume for now this means the equity allocation that maximizes the SWR) with respect to changes in PE10 is less sensitive to changes in PE10 the longer your time horizon and / or the higher your target terminal balance....

I'm not sure I see anything here that dramatically changes the company's long - term intrinsic value, but the recent price decline really illustrates how sentiment can have so much more impact in this sector.

«So in terms of features and content and all that, it has everything in it the same as it was in the 360 version - we didn't take anything out, we didn't change any of that stuff.

This Vita version is a beautiful looking game, and while it doesn't exactly offer anything groundbreaking in terms of new features or changes to the core WipEout gameplay, it does what it aims to do with point - blank precision.

Without spoiling anything, let's simply say that a shift in perspective drastically changes preconceived notions of familiar paths, adding a considerable layer of depth in both terms of character development and narrative, while further cementing its impeccable gameplay variance.

But more recently we have hard empirical and observational data that demonstrate that not only were the projections correct (as far as they went) they were, if anything, too modest in terms of rates of change.

A couple of hundredths of degrees in the US rankings and no change in anything that could be considered climatically important (specifically long term trends).

And guaranties that the cited above G8 deal is dead on arrival... Not that the deal will change anything, except for UK government which has been fantastic on Carbon reductions, The Senator and acolytes would have trouble explaining the disappearing Arctic Ocean ice, not that someone is capable of «Hoaxing» vanishing multi year ice, and even further, failing to match their statements with Polar ice disappearing in tandem with world wide temperatures being flat, not rising for ten years now, as they like to claim, how to explain the disappearing ice then??? Those trying to explain a long term cycle, beware!

Of course, as they point out «because rainfall is such a variable element, trend values are highly dependent on the start and end dates of the analysis» and the fact they are simply using linear interpolation it is very difficult to derive anything meaningful in terms of climate change from just one map.

For the scientific community in more normal times it would be just a matter of noting changes up or down and what if anything it was telling us lomg term..

There are open questions and uncertainties in the details of carbon cycle, but not at a level that would change anything in near or intermediate term.

Lets look at the short term CO2 growth rate change due to temperature change and notice that the fudged record does not track growth rate change as well as the charts do here: http://www.biomind.de/realCO2/ When I try to understand why the CO2 levels may have been kept low by the LONG effects of volcanic activity as well as Krakatoa in 1883 I see a VE6 in 1902 and another in 1912 but then none that large until 1991 and I do not remember it being anything like the descriptions of Krakatoa.

original research papers, four books in several editions, many book chapters, around a thousand articles in major newspapers and magazines, and... But none of that means anything, in terms of whether my calculations of the insolation changes are right or wrong.

Matt Nisbet says, «We really need to get beyond power politics on climate change, where almost anything goes to win politically in the short - term.»

Dr. Tom Karl summarized the impact most succinctly in his testimony to this committee last week when he said that he would stand by the IPCC's original assessment: «If you ask me to give qualifications about the findings in the 2001 report with the same caveat in terms of defining likelihood, I personally would not change anything.»

This would seem ridiculous (although the law may see it differently), as I could potentially change (in actual meaning, rather than just rewriting the same logic but with different terms) every line of code and it would cease to have anything to do with the original author.

My own business model uses the 10 year term for business purposes simply because businesses change too fast to lock in anything longer and assume it will be accurate.

Samsung hasn't changed anything from last year's Note 4 — which was also covered in a metal frame — in terms of button placement.

When Democrats controlled both houses of Congress early in President Obama's first term, they failed to change anything.

«These changes really don't offer anything major in terms of improvements beyond sharing of images,» Mason says.

Adding a new form of capital in terms of private or institutional equity doesn't really change anything.

So, in terms of actual reach, Zuckerberg's announcement doesn't change anything.