«He was always super-clear, whenever it came to
anything dealing with the state's interests, don't even drift that way,» said the researcher.
Not exact matches
Because the
deal that secured the votes of the conservative House sect known as the Freedom Caucus, allows
states to seek waivers that let them opt out of basic protections for some citizens — rules, for example, that prevent insurers from charging virtually
anything they want to «cover» those
with preexisting conditions or that demand that insurers provide certain basic health and preventive care services.
Same thing for the amount of energy to form a universe, it's beyond
anything I can imagine, I'm blind to
anything outside the realm of energy I'm used to
dealing with or seeing in use in typical daily settings, cars, homes, cities,
states, etc...
The governor has previously rejected the notion that his book
deal had
anything to do
with state business, saying book income is «an exception» because «I'm not allowed to represent anyone or any business matter.»
I actually went to my
state representative's office and filed a complaint
with the CFPB about my loan servicer, which is AES, the worst company I've ever
dealt with for
anything.
I don't see it
stating you can't do it, but I also don't see
anything stating how it would
deal with the tax situation, so as such, I'm more or less assuming it's not allowed.
You'll find information on extensions, past returns,
state returns and
anything else that
deals with filing taxes.
Then he ended
with this «We currently seem to be operating under the «no regrets» climate policy first formulated under the first Bush administration, which basically
states that if
anything undesirable should happen because of global climate change, we will then
deal with that problem after the fact.»
In the meantime back in the real world Teh Modulz don't agree
with each other, and any intellectually honest and remotely objective observer would not be claiming that CAGW True Believers have, to a (wo) man, declared that this
state of affairs proves much of
anything other than something which is already axiomatic: there really is a great
deal more forward - looking uncertainty that rearward.
Often times, individuals are so exhausted by the preoccupation
with the betrayal that they come to a
state where they don't want to
deal with anything associated
with it.
I had two instances in an effort to sell to a past client, a country property listed by Toronto agents, wherein the Toronto agents, and one Toronto lawyer removed the water return rate and septic tank clauses from the offer,
stating that if the buyer could afford to buy the house he could
deal with anything that might go wrong, telling me that it was not the seller's responsibility to permit those contingency clauses to be there.
The District and most
states (including Virginia and Maryland) have laws that shield real estate professionals from personal liability for failing to share «non-material» facts — such as
anything that doesn't
deal with the home's physical structure or improvements —
with a prospective buyer.