Sentences with phrase «anything wrong by»

What could conceivably be more extreme than asserting, «We aren't doing anything wrong by existing and making a good life for ourselves.»

You will feel liberated when you realise that you're not doing anything wrong by taking back control of your life.

Neither my friend and colleague Zarmena nor Kotaku's Jason Schreier did anything wrong by posting the report, but we're all fooling ourselves if we think there's much weight to it.

I just keep telling myself that my daughter is a leader and isn't doing anything wrong by questioning me.

You are not doing anything wrong by breastfeeding in public, all you are doing is giving your baby some food.

I HAVE N'T done anything wrong by getting up every single time he needs me (2 - 6 times per night).

Just because the manufacturer doesn't want to spend the money on the research needed to apply for licences for those indications doesn't mean that doctors are doing anything wrong by using it for those indications, when the experiential data is that it is both safe and effective for IOL and PPH.

If you live in a time and place that is ruled over by a tyrant and you follow their laws in fear, you have not done anything wrong by doing so.

Well, the Bible does condone slavery so he isn't doing anything wrong by treating his employees like slaves.

Scenarios like these will continue to happen b / c of this issue and I don't think the kid did anything wrong by doing what he felt was morally right.

The argument can in fact be made that the e-book retailers aren't actually doing anything wrong by allowing such content to be sold, because it is fiction.

Regardless of his motives, however, is Thiel doing anything wrong by funding Hogan's case?

Not exact matches

Berloni doesn't see anything wrong with bringing your dog to yoga classes, if your pet has a good time there and isn't getting stressed by the experience.

There is no evidence that the companies endorsed by Mayweather, whose publicity firm did not respond to a request for comment, have done anything wrong.

Every one of the VCs who apologized has said they had no idea that they'd done anything wrong, or made anyone uncomfortable by their actions.

We, on the other hand, view it with hope: because more than anything, the events of the past few days show that the truth is getting out — the truth that capital markets simply can not exist under the authoritarian rule of central planners, the truth that the stock market is a casino in which the best one can hope for a quick flip, and finally the truth that our entire socio - economic regime, whose existence has been predicated by borrowing from the uncreated wealth of the future, and where accumulated debt could be wiped out at the flip of a switch if things go wrong in the process obliterating the welfare of billions (of less than 1 % ers), is one big lie.

So, Karen is not doing anything wrong in the eyes of the church by using birth control meds to balance her hormones.

Actually Jesus you're wrong about what Atheism said, prayer changes things by not doing anything and allowing the natural (disastrous) course of events to transpire.

She just wanted to bi.tch about that fat old man who dissed her in front of everybody by making it sound like she's just the sweetest little ole thang that never did anything wrong ever!

Regardless of your beliefs and views, is it not tasteless for CNN to run this as their lead story on Easter morning??? Americans are appalled by anything done to insult Islam believers, so why is this felt to be appropriate??? There is nothing wrong with the article, but its timing makes it a poor and inflammatory choice of journalism, and would be taken as «persecution» if was directed toward any other belief system.

Nah, she just wanted to bi.tch about that fat old man who dissed her in front of everybody by making it sound like she's just the sweetest little ole thang that never did anything wrong ever!

They also enable a «false positive» profile of the Dictators» system by lauding and applauding them / it publicly and avoiding the identification or acknowledgement of anything wrong.

I will conclude by saying that on the atheistic there is no objective morality anyways so I don't believe that the atheist has any grounds for accusing God or anyone else for that matter if doing anything evil or wrong.

The problem for Bell is that many of those same people think he's been moving in the «wrong direction», and church leaders are now wary of endorsing anything by him.

Because we Christians know that God exists by divine revelation so we know that anything that directly disagrees with it, must be wrong.

The trolley will be coming by any minute now and I wouldn't want you to stand in the wrong place or face the wrong way or anything like that... really!

Not sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the word then that word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does God use violence to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Christ.

And, if we know anything about human nature, we know we have a desire for certainty, a fear of being wrong, a tendency to difine ourselves by our beliefs and to identify those like - minded, the «us» of the them / us divide.

Yet God is the One who values and uses, because God incorporates into the divine life which is everlasting the good that takes place in the historical sequence; and God overrules or uses for good that which comes from the «vain imagination of foolish men» in their sin and defection — and, we may add, from anything else that is evil or wrong thanks to the free decisions made by the creatures in their divinely granted capacity to choose among relevant possibilities.

So I guess I'm not at all shocked by the findings of the study, but also don't feel there is anything wrong or bad about the expected results as a whole.

This perspective unmistakably reveals the unwholesomeness, not to put it more strongly, of our way of life: our obsession with sex, violence, and the pornography of «making it;» our addictive dependence on drugs, «entertainment,» and the evening news; our impatience with anything that limits our sovereign freedom of choice, especially with the constraints of marital and familial ties; our preference for «nonbinding commitments;» our third - rate educational system; our third - rate morality; our refusal to draw a distinction between right and wrong, lest we «impose» their morality on us; our reluctance to judge or be judged; our indifference to the needs of future generations, as evidence by our willingness to saddle them with a huge national debt, an overgrown arsenal of destruction, and a deteriorating environment; our unsated assumption, which underlies so much of the propaganda for unlimited abortion, that only those children born for success ought to be allowed to be born at all.

Whenever a class is silenced by a loud voice, later on some kids whould say: «we did not do anything wrong.»

OOO — no i am not confusing anything, i'm reading blogs posted by intolerant idiots attacking people who believe in God, saying they're naive, saying that they're wrong and that what they believe is a myth.

I don't think there is anything wrong with being demonstrative and have a deep love and respect for some of my wilder brethren, but it's really important to me that people can have deep, experiential encounters of the presence of God without being alienated by some of the cultural baggage we have in the South.

LOL nice way to stir the masses... by the way... The scripture of «Thou shalt have no other gods before me» (meaning Jehovah himself) all will see regardless if they want to read and research any of this... so lets get the crybabies going how they aren't going to study anything, and how that all who do are wrong... Sam

People do wrong things regardless of faith... it mostly because greediness, power and so on... very few among the mankind fear Lord The Almighty which includes Muslims as well... and which is why today we see these actions are being done by human in everywhere... as a matter of fact its been there since the beginning of mankind... now we have been blessed with media and anything happens, next minute we can see it and sometimes we see what the media wants us to see...

Most of them, to judge by what I've seen of them and their advance notices, are by authors who want to change the subject - to what's wrong with church teaching on sexuality, to celibacy, to women's ordination, to democratizing decision making, to anything but fidelity.

I think if anything this country would be a mormon country since it was founded here... but since mythology is all myths lets all be happy we live in a country where people can believe what they wish and be open about it yet those beliefs based on nothing more then each persons personal «experiences» which are questionable at best have little impact on the government which dictates the laws we live by... WRONG!

• In an online debate, organised by frontpagemagazine.com last December Akyol argued that «Pope Benedict has said, «for Muslim teaching, God is absolutely transcendent, His will is not bound up with any of our categories, even that of rationality» However this is not the universal Muslim opinion... The Mutazila (school of thought believed) that God was rational and «justice was the essence of God, He could not wrong anybody, he could not enjoin anything contrary to reason.»

When we consider Murphy's Law (if anything can go wrong, it will), it seems it is only by God's grace that we haven't pressed the button for more than 36 years.

Many strict Jains believe that murdering ** anything ** is wrong - even plants - they'll only eat what is «freely given» by the plants.

You Said ---- Moral relativity doesn't work because if it did then I could, say, club a baby seal and as long as I can justify by my moral position then you could not say anything was wrong.

Moral relativity doesn't work because if it did then I could, say, club a baby seal and as long as I can justify by my moral position then you could not say anything was wrong.

They're wrong, but I understand it — it's difficult to take anything seriously when it's preceded by a dancing gorilla.

You are attacking me by saying I am ascribing anything to you when in neither post did I. That's a wrong attitude Mr Myers.

I was seen by doctors in several states who seemingly ran every test under the sun, but no one could find anything wrong with me, so they said I had IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome) and that I should eat more fiber (i.e. gluten).

I've been testing out the new drinking oats by Rude Health, and because they are super fine and flaky, they blend effortlessly into smoothies thickening them up without the need for extra banana or nut butter... not that there is anything wrong with either of those ingredients, it's just that sometimes you don't want hugely bananary smoothie and sometimes you want a few extra carbs over fats.

i hate those who mention cesc in their comment, who is him by the way, is he a god, can someone tell me where will he play in our starting11 or who should we bench so that he can play by the way why bothering mentioning someone who plays for chelsea.we did nt need him and he did nt need us and mou said that, if he realy respect us as you faithful fab fans think then why he has not said anything about that until now.for me arsene was right about that and fab was the one who was wrong for choosing chelsea while he knows that mou will mock us and the manager that he said he respected so much.he is just like other judas who play for our rivals and i will not make a plea if he will be bood at the emirates.

Xhaka's is too high, seven is a high score, 5 is average by his standards and six is slightly above, 6 is not doing anything wrong but not really doing anything of note by the same token.

This isn't to say there is anything wrong with being friendly — we should strive to be nice to people, I think — but because Romo was devoid of anything else that made him stand out, he came to be defined by his failings, and that's bogus.