There is a hint here that the sandwich may substitute for the meat, with presumably troubling implications for Newbigin's
apologetic task.
This new
apologetic task is not unlike other apologetic tasks undertaken by Christianity in other periods, especially at the time the biblical tradition encountered the Greco - Roman world in the first centuries of the Christian era, from Paul to Augustine, and at the time of the transition from the Middle Ages to the dawn of modernity, including the great reformations of Europe and the Americas.
Stackhouse sees a «third great moment» now upon us when theologians must attend specifically to
the apologetic task.
He had the rare gift of relating ideas to circumstances, and felt that his particular
apologetic task was to show the relevance of the Christian revelation to the hard problems of history.
Part of
the apologetic task of Christian theologians is to show the reasonableness of this belief.
The «confessionalist» bias of much modern theology ill equips us for this ecumenically open,
apologetic task.
The apologetic task is to test for truth, not necessarily to vanquish opponents.
Not exact matches
That's the point I was gesturing at with my comment about the different
tasks of
apologetics and dogmatics: Apologetics has its place, but it should not be allowed to distort
apologetics and dogmatics:
Apologetics has its place, but it should not be allowed to distort
Apologetics has its place, but it should not be allowed to distort dogmatics.
Other
tasks, too, besides interpreting Scripture face theologians,
tasks both intramural (dealing with the church) and extramural (dialoguing with the world)-
tasks of phenomenological analysis of theologies past and present and of
apologetics, philosophical, evangelistic, and defensive - but these can not be spoken of here either.
Karl Barth famously attacked
apologetics — the attempt to offer a persuasive account of Christian belief on mutually agreed - upon grounds of reason — as a misguided
task, part of the failure of theological liberalism.
In the same essay, Davison puts forward the case for continuing to use theological language, even when it might be strange, because «it is the
task of
apologetics to make things clear and on other occasions it is the
task of
apologetics to cut through the vapid familiarity of our time and present something unfamiliar, glorious and true».
A theology of police work is no answer, but a religious message that seriously addresses itself to the problems of violence and the need for order and authority within a democratic, legal framework must be, as I see it, a central
task for the theologian and for Christian
apologetics.
If we accept these strictures for theology, then it follows that contemporary theology must be alienated from the Church, that it can be neither kerygmatic, dogmatic nor
apologetic, and thus its deepest immediate
task is the discovery of its own ground.
That
task can be specified more exactly: it is to capacitate students» minds quite specifically for
apologetics, for making well - warranted cases for theories about what can and can not be known about God, what should and should not be done in fidelity to God's nature and action.
But the
task of
apologetics — making Christian belief intelligible — remains inescapable.