The authority of the sacerdos is derived by
apostolic succession from the incarnate Christ; the authority of the episcopal propheta stems from the eternal Christ.
But there is no idea here of
apostolic succession from Peter to the Pope.
Not exact matches
In a cultural environment where all authority is suspect and the notion of divine authority is thought to be a psychological hangover
from the premodern world, the claim that divine authority is transmitted in an unbroken chain of
apostolic succession through the bishops of the Church in communion with the bishop of Rome seems literally incredible.
Since the Catholic Church believes in
apostolic succession, they argue that the authority to forgive sins was passed down
from the apostles through the Pope to the priests.
How one gets to «
apostolic succession»
from the supposed quotation referring to Peter is an example of the miraculous.
One who affirms a doctrine of
apostolic succession culminating in the authority of the bishop of Rome must not only choose between
succession of teaching or
succession of office (as J. B. Lightfoot in his own day understood), but also surmount the historiographical difficulty posed by the early Church's transition
from apostles to presbyters, and
from presbyters to a single monarchical bishop.