Sentences with phrase «appeal a court ruling dismissing»

The six former staff members, all of them women, who sued former Assemblyman Dennis Gabryszak for sexual harassment will appeal a court ruling dismissing all or part of their lawsuits.

Not exact matches

Popular social - review site Yelp is in court once again over alleged extortion and review manipulating now that a group of business owners is attempting to appeal a ruling that was dismissed in federal court two years ago.

The Supreme Court ordered the Ninth Circuit's ruling vacated, with instructions to dismiss the appeal.

On June 15, Buhari had appealed against a previous ruling of the court dismissing his preliminary objection to the suit filed by Nwokocha - Ahaaiwe, an Abuja based lawyer.

«The home secretary is now running out of legal options after three appeal court judges unanimously dismissed her challenge, ruling that «torture is universally abhorred as an evil» and that the UK can not deport Abu Qatada if there is a risk that evidence gained through forced or violent confessions will be used against him in a trial.

The Supreme Court had on Friday dismissed an appeal filed by the governor challenging the verdict of an Abuja Federal High Court which ruled in favour of Akeredolu's opponent in the primaries that produced, Mr. Segun Adams.

While delivering its judgment, the US court of appeals on Monday dismissed the complaint and upheld the ruling of the lower court.

Congressional candidate Liz Berney said she plans to appeal a Nassau appellate court ruling that dismissed her claims of fraud against Republican primary opponent Dr. James Milano.

The Ondo State Governor, Oluwarotimi Akeredolu, has said there is no cause for alarm over the supreme Court ruling which dismissed the appeal filed by him...

Here's the decision by four appellate court judges — two Democrats and two Republicans — dismissing Sen. Craig Johnson's appeal of a Dec. 4 ruling of State Supreme Court Justice Ira Warshawsky that handed the 7th SD race to Republican Jack Marcourt judges — two Democrats and two Republicans — dismissing Sen. Craig Johnson's appeal of a Dec. 4 ruling of State Supreme Court Justice Ira Warshawsky that handed the 7th SD race to Republican Jack MarCourt Justice Ira Warshawsky that handed the 7th SD race to Republican Jack Martins.

In addition, the Department of Justice has dismissed its appeal of the Seattle federal court ruling that suspended the first order (13769) on Tuesday.

The state Court of Appeals ruled against a motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought against telecommunications giant Sprint by the state.

The U.S. Department of Justice on Tuesday said it would voluntarily dismiss its own appeal of a Seattle federal court ruling that had suspended President Donald Trump's first executive order concerning travel from seven Muslim - majority countries.

No, the old travel ban (EC 13769) is revoked and the Justice Department has dismissed its appeal of the Seattle federal court ruling.

Senate President Bukola Saraki has expressed disappointment over the Supreme Court's ruling on Friday, which dismissed his appeal to stop his trial at the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT), over alleged false assets declaration, while the Governor of Kwara State.

The appeal before the apex court is challenging an earlier ruling of the Court of Appeal which affirmed Justice Abang's decision dismissing Metuh's no - case submiappeal before the apex court is challenging an earlier ruling of the Court of Appeal which affirmed Justice Abang's decision dismissing Metuh's no - case submiscourt is challenging an earlier ruling of the Court of Appeal which affirmed Justice Abang's decision dismissing Metuh's no - case submisCourt of Appeal which affirmed Justice Abang's decision dismissing Metuh's no - case submiAppeal which affirmed Justice Abang's decision dismissing Metuh's no - case submission.

A state appeals court ruled that Nassau's financial control board has the authority to suspend contractual pay increases for county employees, and dismissed union challenges to a three - year wage freeze that ended in 2014.

The first runner - up in the September 2016, governorship primary of the All Progressives Congress in Ondo State, Mr. Olusegun Abraham, has commended the ruling of the Court of Appeal which dismissed the application for stay of court proceedings filed by Governor Rotimi AkereCourt of Appeal which dismissed the application for stay of court proceedings filed by Governor Rotimi Akerecourt proceedings filed by Governor Rotimi Akeredolu.

Less than a month after a New York state appeals court ruled that chimpanzees do not have legal rights and can not be released from captivity, a case involving a second chimp has been dismissed

In ruling on the due - process question, the appeals court overturned a district court's decision to dismiss the case, which involved a San Antonio science teacher's claim that he was «constructively discharged «3from his position without a hearing prior to his dismissal.

The Kentucky Court of Appeals has upheld a lower - court ruling that dismissed charges of «educational malpractice» against a private scCourt of Appeals has upheld a lower - court ruling that dismissed charges of «educational malpractice» against a private sccourt ruling that dismissed charges of «educational malpractice» against a private school.

In June, California's Fourth District Court of Appeal ruled that a charter school student was not entitled to the evidentiary hearing required under Education Code section 48918 before being dismissed from a charter school for bringing a knife to school and threatening a fellow student (Scott B. v. Orange County High School of Arts 217 Cal.App.4 th 117 (Cal.App.

They could have ruled on it way back last autumn when the denial of the motion to dismiss the original complaint was appealed, but by then Michael E Mann, whose original complaint was as poorly constructed as his hockey stick, had filed his amended complaint, so the Court of Appeals ruled that it was moot.

It did not find that the appeal was moot because the trial court ruled on the motion to dismiss after the filing of the amended complaint.

The new trial court stated: «The only scenario likely to cause further delay of concern to Plaintiff is the possibility that the Court of Appeals will not rule on the jurisdictional issue or on the merits, but will dismiss the appeal as moot, concluding that the trial court should not have denied the motions to dismiss the first complaint after the Plaintiff had filed his amended complaint.&rcourt stated: «The only scenario likely to cause further delay of concern to Plaintiff is the possibility that the Court of Appeals will not rule on the jurisdictional issue or on the merits, but will dismiss the appeal as moot, concluding that the trial court should not have denied the motions to dismiss the first complaint after the Plaintiff had filed his amended complaint.&rCourt of Appeals will not rule on the jurisdictional issue or on the merits, but will dismiss the appeal as moot, concluding that the trial court should not have denied the motions to dismiss the first complaint after the Plaintiff had filed his amended complaint.&rcourt should not have denied the motions to dismiss the first complaint after the Plaintiff had filed his amended complaint.»

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Tuesday dismissed the suit on the grounds that the power plant rule isn't yet final.

While there appeared to be a consensus for years that strict language was required to displace the common law without infringing on the ESA, Rose says a 2016 Ontario Court of Appeal decision dismissed an appeal from a motion judge's ruling upholding a termination clause — providing «the minimum required by the ESA» — that was linguistically sparse compared to earlier ruAppeal decision dismissed an appeal from a motion judge's ruling upholding a termination clause — providing «the minimum required by the ESA» — that was linguistically sparse compared to earlier ruappeal from a motion judge's ruling upholding a termination clause — providing «the minimum required by the ESA» — that was linguistically sparse compared to earlier rulings.

He brought proceedings for damages by way of application under the elusive Pt 19 of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (SI 2010/2955) and which were dismissed and he was back before the Court of Appeal to challenge that dismissal.

The latest ruling involving TREB and the Competition Bureau was released Friday, with the federal court dismissing an appeal by TREB of a Competition Tribunal decision from 2016.

The judge dismissed the appeal after ruling that Megaro «blatantly disregarded» court rules.

The summary conviction appeal court judge dismissed the appeals on the basis that the trial judge had jurisdiction in both matters, that the rules of procedure in both trials would essentially have been the same, and that Sciascia was not prejudiced by any differences in the applicable rules of evidence.

The Arizona Court of Appeals decided to dismiss in part, affirm in part and vacate in part the trial court's rulCourt of Appeals decided to dismiss in part, affirm in part and vacate in part the trial court's rulcourt's rulings.

In the ruling, the Supreme Court held an appeal by the school board should be dismissed, after the board objected to having committee members who were present at the meeting testify as part of the grievance process.

Then the Ontario Court of Appeal in Oudin v. Centre Francophone de Toronto dismissed an appeal from a motion judge's ruling upholding a termination clause (providing «the minimum required by the ESA») that was linguistically sparse and relatively imprecise when compared to earlier ruAppeal in Oudin v. Centre Francophone de Toronto dismissed an appeal from a motion judge's ruling upholding a termination clause (providing «the minimum required by the ESA») that was linguistically sparse and relatively imprecise when compared to earlier ruappeal from a motion judge's ruling upholding a termination clause (providing «the minimum required by the ESA») that was linguistically sparse and relatively imprecise when compared to earlier rulings.

Rule of Law Court of Appeal Dismisses Appeal in Scholz v. Scholz In reasons for judgment released on June 23, 2013, the Court of Appeal dismissed Ruth Scholz's appeal in Scholz v. Scholz, 2013 BCCAppeal Dismisses Appeal in Scholz v. Scholz In reasons for judgment released on June 23, 2013, the Court of Appeal dismissed Ruth Scholz's appeal in Scholz v. Scholz, 2013 BCCAppeal in Scholz v. Scholz In reasons for judgment released on June 23, 2013, the Court of Appeal dismissed Ruth Scholz's appeal in Scholz v. Scholz, 2013 BCCAppeal dismissed Ruth Scholz's appeal in Scholz v. Scholz, 2013 BCCappeal in Scholz v. Scholz, 2013 BCCA 309.

In dismissing the appeal in Burden v United Kingdom (7 May 2008, Appn 13378 / 05, discussed at 158 NLJ 681, [2008] All ER (D) 391 (Apr)-RRB-, the Grand Chamber (GC) of the European Court of Human Rights held British inheritance tax rules did not improperly discriminate between the situations of civil partners and the two appellant sisters.

Ontario's Divisional Court conditionally certified the action as a class proceeding in April 2009, and the Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed an attempt by Quizno's to stay the proceedings in a June 2010 ruling.

In this groundbreaking case, the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled that the trial court correctly dismissed a legal malpractice suit against the attorney and his law firm because the underlying product liability claim plaintiffs» asserted should have been pursued was statutorily preempted under the federal Medical Device Act («MDA&raqCourt of Appeals ruled that the trial court correctly dismissed a legal malpractice suit against the attorney and his law firm because the underlying product liability claim plaintiffs» asserted should have been pursued was statutorily preempted under the federal Medical Device Act («MDA&raqcourt correctly dismissed a legal malpractice suit against the attorney and his law firm because the underlying product liability claim plaintiffs» asserted should have been pursued was statutorily preempted under the federal Medical Device Act («MDA»).

The B.C. Court of Appeal ruled in favour of Joseph Clements by setting aside the trial judge's order and dismissed Joan's action.

(Order, p. 2) As the court notes in its summary of the order, an acquittal can issue either when a jury returns a not - guilty verdict, or «when a trial court grants a defendant's new trial motion for evidentiary insufficiency... or dismisses a case... for evidentiary insufficiency» (Id., pp. 2 — 3) The essence of the court's decision is in two parts: (1) The new trial motion should not have been granted because there was sufficient evidence to convict Mr. Stern on counts of conspiracy; and (2) Because the trial court did not rule on the majority of the issues raised in Stern's motion for a new trial, those issues have yet to be decided, and should be addressed on remand by the court of appeals.

By ruling that Ms. Wood's contract was enforceable because it did not warrant fresh consideration in the circumstances, the Court of Appeal dismissed an argument that could have set a highly onerous precedent for employers.

The Federal Court dismissed the Union's application for judicial review and ruled that the Appeals Officer's determination was reasonable.

The Court of Appeal ruled that the application should be dismissed.

In Toy v Edmonton (Police Service), the Alberta Court of Appeal dismissed former Constable Elvin Toy's appeal of a 2015 ruling that led to his discharge from the Appeal dismissed former Constable Elvin Toy's appeal of a 2015 ruling that led to his discharge from the appeal of a 2015 ruling that led to his discharge from the force.

Had the appeal court ruled the other way and upheld the Superior Court's judgment, Rashid says it could also have sparked a rash of solicitors» negligence actions in similar cases where the shorter deadline would have resulted in claims being dismicourt ruled the other way and upheld the Superior Court's judgment, Rashid says it could also have sparked a rash of solicitors» negligence actions in similar cases where the shorter deadline would have resulted in claims being dismiCourt's judgment, Rashid says it could also have sparked a rash of solicitors» negligence actions in similar cases where the shorter deadline would have resulted in claims being dismissed.

The Court of Appeal held that the test for dismissing an action at a status hearing under Rule 48.14 (13) is NOT the same as the test for dismissing an action under Rule 24 (also a rule permitting dismissals for delay, but on the defendant's motiRule 48.14 (13) is NOT the same as the test for dismissing an action under Rule 24 (also a rule permitting dismissals for delay, but on the defendant's motiRule 24 (also a rule permitting dismissals for delay, but on the defendant's motirule permitting dismissals for delay, but on the defendant's motion).

The surprise decision upholds a unanimous decision last month by five Quebec Court of Appeal judges, in which the court overturned a Quebec Superior Court ruling that had endorsed the BCE takeover and dismissed the objections of Bell bondholders concerned the deal would harm the value of their investCourt of Appeal judges, in which the court overturned a Quebec Superior Court ruling that had endorsed the BCE takeover and dismissed the objections of Bell bondholders concerned the deal would harm the value of their investcourt overturned a Quebec Superior Court ruling that had endorsed the BCE takeover and dismissed the objections of Bell bondholders concerned the deal would harm the value of their investCourt ruling that had endorsed the BCE takeover and dismissed the objections of Bell bondholders concerned the deal would harm the value of their investment.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals of the Ermineskin Nation et al. against the Federal Court of Appeal ruling that denied the plaintiffs» claim that the federal government had a fiduciary role under Treaty Number 6 such that the oil and gas revenues resulting from extraction under the plaintiffs» land should have been invested for their benefit.

For example case management justices dismissing cases in Alberta contrary to the rules of court or single judges sitting dismissing appeals at Court of appeal (very prevalent in Alberta) and chambers judges and masters acting like they are trial judges (masters dismiss cases and act outside of the jurisdiction allowed by the QBcourt or single judges sitting dismissing appeals at Court of appeal (very prevalent in Alberta) and chambers judges and masters acting like they are trial judges (masters dismiss cases and act outside of the jurisdiction allowed by the QBCourt of appeal (very prevalent in Alberta) and chambers judges and masters acting like they are trial judges (masters dismiss cases and act outside of the jurisdiction allowed by the QB Act)

In addition, although the negligent supervision claims asserted against Smith were not predicated on piercing the corporate veil, the Court of Appeals ruled that they were also properly dismissed.