Not exact matches
As the DWP's most recent figures show, more than half of the cases
where someone
appealed against a
decision judging them «fit for work» have resulted in the original
decision being overturned.
«
Where the Court of
Appeal lacks the necessary jurisdiction, in the first place, to hear and determine the appeal before it, such as in the instant case, no decision of the court against the competent appeal lies to this
Appeal lacks the necessary jurisdiction, in the first place, to hear and determine the
appeal before it, such as in the instant case, no decision of the court against the competent appeal lies to this
appeal before it, such as in the instant case, no
decision of the court
against the competent
appeal lies to this
appeal lies to this court.
The private security firm TigerSwan, known for its controversial military - style tactics
against Dakota Access Pipeline protesters, is
appealing the
decision to deny its application for a license to operate in the state of Louisiana,
where Energy Transfer Partners is building the Bayou Bridge Pipeline.
The problem is easily illustrated by SW v RC [2008] EWHC 73 (Fam),
where Mr Justice Singer contrasted the meanings of 14 days from «the determination
against which the
appeal» (in FPR 1991 r 4.22 (3): Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), Sch 1 proceedings) as
against from «the date of the order or
decision appealed against» in r 8.1 (4)(ancillary relief proceedings); and what for this purpose, he asked, «constitutes a «determination», and an «order or
decision»?»
The court will hear arguments tomorrow in a case
where a Toronto doctor is
appealing a Superior Court
decision that dismissed his libel action
against a former head of the Ontario Trial Lawyers Association and ordered him to pay more than $ 310,000 in costs.
«TCC claims 2.1 The following are examples of the types of claim which it may be appropriate to bring as TCC claims --(a) building or other construction disputes, including claims for the enforcement of the
decisions of adjudicators under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996; (b) engineering disputes; (c) claims by and
against engineers, architects, surveyors, accountants and other specialised advisers relating to the services they provide; (d) claims by and
against local authorities relating to their statutory duties concerning the development of land or the construction of buildings; (e) claims relating to the design, supply and installation of computers, computer software and related network systems; (f) claims relating to the quality of goods sold or hired, and work done, materials supplied or services rendered; (g) claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant; (h) claims between neighbours, owners and occupiers of land in trespass, nuisance etc; (i) claims relating to the environment (for example, pollution cases); (j) claims arising out of fires; (k) claims involving taking of accounts
where these are complicated; and (l) challenges to
decisions of arbitrators in construction and engineering disputes including applications for permission to
appeal and
appeals.»
The court will hear arguments tomorrow in a case
where a Toronto doctor is
appealing a Superior Court
decision that dismissed his libel action
against a former...
Similarly, in Erdmann v Complaints Inquiry Committee, 2016 ABCA 145 (CanLII), Justices Jack Watson, Bruce McDonald and Frederica Schutz dismissed an
appeal of a professional disciplinary body's
decision against the appellant,
where she had been found guilty of three counts of unprofessional conduct as a chartered accountant and ordered to pay fines and costs.
(2) Sections 109 (constitutional questions) and 123 (giving
decisions), section 125 and subsection 126 (5)(language of proceedings) and sections 132 (judge sitting on
appeal), 136 (prohibition
against photography at court hearing) and 146 (
where procedures not provided) also apply to proceedings under the Criminal Code (Canada), except in so far as they are inconsistent with that Act.
Edward Denehan successfully
appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)
against a
decision of the First Tier Tribunal refusing to allow a landlord to recover litigation costs
against a tenant under an indemnity clause in a long lease in a case
where the FTT had awarded the landlord part of its costs under rule 13 (1)(b) of the Tribunal Procedure (First - tier Tribunal)(Property Chamber) Rules 2013: 87 St George's Square Management Ltd v Michael Henry Anthony Whiteside [2016] UKUT 438 (LC).
Where an
appeal is brought
against a
decision of the General Court, the procedure before the Court of Justice shall consist of a written part and an oral part.
Where a commissioner refuses leave to
appeal against a substantive tribunal
decision, his refusal is susceptible to judicial review.Moreover, if a
decision of the LQPM is unappealable to the commissioners, it is susceptible to judicial review.
Where the
decision of an asylum and immigration tribunal to dismiss an
appeal against deportation was based on a misdirection of law, its
decision can not stand, as it is not inevitable that it would have come to the same conclusion if properly directed.
On
appeal the
decision against a refused or cancelled certificate may be reversed, but
where that
decision was wrong, there is no provision to award monetary compensation for losses incurred.