Sentences with phrase «appeal against the amount»

A group of people consisting of a chairman (normally solicitor / barrister) and others who exercise a judicial function to determine matters related to specific interests, e.g. VAT Tribunal - appeals against the amount of duty levied by Customs and Excise Lands Tribunal - appeals against the valuation of land

Not exact matches

``... If they feel the fines are not big enough, then the AG could appeal against not the conviction, but the sentencing; the amount of the fine, to give another court the opportunity to review,» Mr. Ankomah opined on Eyewitness News.

The outcome, which included settlements from most of the publishers seeking to avoid lengthy and costly court battles as well as a guilty verdict for Apple that is currently in appeals, has yet to be finalized, but Judge Denise Cote is expected to seek the maximum amount of damages against Apple for its violation of Section One of the Sherman Act.

Global demand for dividend - paying exchange - traded funds (ETFs) is strong, as evidenced by robust flows of over $ 20 billion in 2016; US - based ETFs accounted for more than half of that amount.1 The appeal of dividend - paying stocks is clear, as dividends can help provide a nice offset to rising inflation, while most fixed - coupon debt can not hedge against rising prices.

On appeal, the plaintiffs» requested that the judgment dismissing the action against Mr. Vicentini and Ford Credit be set aside and liability be apportioned equally between those two defendants and Mr. Hoang and requested that the amount of damages be increased.

Another law firm obtained, by summary judgment, an order for payment of its legal fees in the amount of $ 182,569.63 and an order dismissing a former client's counterclaim alleging negligence against it (2017 ONSC 3391, under appeal).

The commission suggest as grounds of appeal against either DO that the person liable actually is not liable to pay maintenance or the DO has been made for the wrong amount and, against a decision on review, that there is no current maintenance calculation and the maximum deduction rate has been calculated based on the most recent information and that there has been a change in net weekly income.

The Claimant contended (and it was accepted by the EAT) that an employee must be offered the opportunity to appeal against any formal decision made by his employer and that must not amount to a formality or sham.

Harrod and others v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police and others Court of Appeal, [2017] IRLR 539; [2017] Pens LR 11 The Court of Appeal has upheld ruling of the EAT, [2015] IRLR 790, in which the EAT allowed the police forces» appeal against a finding that compulsory retirement arrangements for police officers amount to unlawful age discriminAppeal, [2017] IRLR 539; [2017] Pens LR 11 The Court of Appeal has upheld ruling of the EAT, [2015] IRLR 790, in which the EAT allowed the police forces» appeal against a finding that compulsory retirement arrangements for police officers amount to unlawful age discriminAppeal has upheld ruling of the EAT, [2015] IRLR 790, in which the EAT allowed the police forces» appeal against a finding that compulsory retirement arrangements for police officers amount to unlawful age discriminappeal against a finding that compulsory retirement arrangements for police officers amount to unlawful age discrimination.

The Court of Appeal determined that the effect of the order under appeal was to «permanently foreclose» the Appellant from obtaining a determination of its claims against the personal defendants on their merits — a result that amounted to an injuAppeal determined that the effect of the order under appeal was to «permanently foreclose» the Appellant from obtaining a determination of its claims against the personal defendants on their merits — a result that amounted to an injuappeal was to «permanently foreclose» the Appellant from obtaining a determination of its claims against the personal defendants on their merits — a result that amounted to an injustice.

Given the uncertainty of dispute resolution, flat rate pricing may be appealing for your small dispute clients and help you avoid uncomfortable surprises if their legal fees run up too high against the amount in controversy.

Rule 34A (2A) provides: «If the Appeal Tribunal allows an appeal, in full or in part, it may make a costs order against the respondent specifying the respondent pay to the appellant an amount no greater than any fee paid by the appellant under a notice issued by the Lord Chancellor&rAppeal Tribunal allows an appeal, in full or in part, it may make a costs order against the respondent specifying the respondent pay to the appellant an amount no greater than any fee paid by the appellant under a notice issued by the Lord Chancellor&rappeal, in full or in part, it may make a costs order against the respondent specifying the respondent pay to the appellant an amount no greater than any fee paid by the appellant under a notice issued by the Lord Chancellor».

When allowing an appeal against an extended sentence the Court of Appeal was not bound to impose an indeterminate sentence as such a sentence would amount to an increase in sentence and it was precluded from doing that by virtue of Criminal Appeal Act 1968, s 1appeal against an extended sentence the Court of Appeal was not bound to impose an indeterminate sentence as such a sentence would amount to an increase in sentence and it was precluded from doing that by virtue of Criminal Appeal Act 1968, s 1Appeal was not bound to impose an indeterminate sentence as such a sentence would amount to an increase in sentence and it was precluded from doing that by virtue of Criminal Appeal Act 1968, s 1Appeal Act 1968, s 11 (3).

In the past, the Nova Scotia Labour Board attested that the penalty amount charged in a case would not necessarily be considered against the issues underlying the original compliance order, if and when the case was appealed.

Police and Crime Commissioner for Greater Manchester v Butterworth (The Pensions Ombudsman intervening)(Chancery Division, 10th November 2016) Appeal against a determination by the Pensions Ombudsman that a member of the LGPS should be paid a pension equivalent to the full amount of an unreduced pension from the age of 55, raising issues of contractual estoppel, enforceability of ultra vires promises and legitimate expectations.

Healey J. dismissed Ms. Brown's appeal from an order of the Small Claims Court granting judgment in favour of Peel Mutual on its Defendant's Claim against her in the amount of $ 14,833.77.