Sentences with phrase «appeal against the conclusion»

The four complainants announced that they would appeal against the conclusion of the inquiry.

Not exact matches

Separately, an appeal has been submitted by Lord Rennard against the disciplinary process for bringing the party into disrepute by his failure to apologise, and his conduct after the publication of Webster's conclusions.

EEOC has the authority to draw unfavorable conclusions against a party failing to comply with its appeal procedures or requests for information (29 CFR 1614.404 c).

The court has a discretion as to whether repayment should be made by a losing payee spouse; and thus for example «to order repayment unconditionally or subject to a prohibition against enforcement against her without further leave»; but such discretion «should certainly not be equated with that of determining the incidence of costs at the conclusion of an appeal».

Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against sentence was allowed — Trial judge erred in concluding that discharge was not appropriate in circumstances, especially given conclusion that accused did not deliberately attempt to injure victim — Trial judge found that there was no need for either specific deterrence or general deterrence; prime concern was need for denunciation of her conduct — Section 730 of Criminal Code permits discharge in cases of this nature, provided that it was in best interest of accused and not contrary to public interest — Accused was responsible individual with no record whatsoever, she held position as counsellor and social worker for 25 years — Trial judge did not find that conviction would definitely affect her employment, but possibility existed, and such conviction would necessarily result in criminal record — There was no likelihood of re-offending — Conditional discharge would not be contrary to public interest.

Where the decision of an asylum and immigration tribunal to dismiss an appeal against deportation was based on a misdirection of law, its decision can not stand, as it is not inevitable that it would have come to the same conclusion if properly directed.

You may very well be a rare fair - minded individual working within the wrong camp (as I describe misguided government agency assisted highjacker outfits like Realtysellers) who has bought into the idea that what TREB did to Realtyseller / Dale / Beach awhile back (cutting them off from the MLS) was unjust, when in fact it was very just, according to a judge who ruled against the highjackers at that time at the conclusion of Realtysellers» court appeal against TREB's actions.

These concerns arise through threats of litigation made against the association, and while a court might direct a respondent - plaintiff to exercise the appeal remedy available through the association prior to filing a lawsuit against the association, dismissal of a legal challenge is not a certainty, particularly if the respondent - plaintiff can argue that the association's appeal remedy, though available, would result in a predetermined or sham conclusion.