«The plan is for him to be with us at the Club World Cup, and we'll see if he can play the first game,» he said, adding that the club would
appeal against the decision taken by UEFA to give defender Dani Carvajal a game's suspension for deliberately time wasting in order to force a yellow card away to APOEL Nicosia with the aim of going into the knockout stage of the Champions League free of cards.
Not exact matches
Speaking with the Sunday Mirror, the spokesperson to Otunba Alao - Akala, Prince Dotun Oyelade, said the party would certainly file an
appeal against the judgement but was yet to meet to
take a
decision on the matter.
«Further, to end a culture of corruption and impunity of perpetrators, we urge the Attorney General of the Federation and the Minister of Justice Mr Abubakar Malami, SAN to urgently
take over the prosecution of the corruption case
against Mr Saraki by ensuring that the CCT
decision is urgently
appealed and that the case is diligently prosecuted within the limits of the rule of law.
If you go to a hearing and the Commission rules
against you, you will have the opportunity to file an
appeal to the
decision; however, it will be very difficult, if not impossible, to find an attorney to
take over your claim at this point.
This is no more than an opinion, but it is an opinion with a special status because it must be
taken into account when any
decision is
taken about compliance with regulatory requirements, eg by the Care Standards Tribunal on an
appeal against a
decision of the commission.
The NMS must be
taken into account by the registration authorities when making registration and enforcement
decisions, as well as by the Care Standards Tribunal when hearing
appeals against decisions of the registration authorities.
«TCC claims 2.1 The following are examples of the types of claim which it may be appropriate to bring as TCC claims --(a) building or other construction disputes, including claims for the enforcement of the
decisions of adjudicators under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996; (b) engineering disputes; (c) claims by and
against engineers, architects, surveyors, accountants and other specialised advisers relating to the services they provide; (d) claims by and
against local authorities relating to their statutory duties concerning the development of land or the construction of buildings; (e) claims relating to the design, supply and installation of computers, computer software and related network systems; (f) claims relating to the quality of goods sold or hired, and work done, materials supplied or services rendered; (g) claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant; (h) claims between neighbours, owners and occupiers of land in trespass, nuisance etc; (i) claims relating to the environment (for example, pollution cases); (j) claims arising out of fires; (k) claims involving
taking of accounts where these are complicated; and (l) challenges to
decisions of arbitrators in construction and engineering disputes including applications for permission to
appeal and
appeals.»
Mr Sabou
appealed against the
decision and claimed during the procedure before the Supreme Administrative Court that the information obtained
against him had been acquired illegally, since he had not been informed of the requests for information and not been able to
take part neither in formulating the questions to the foreign tax authorities nor to
take part in the examination of witnesses in the other Member States.
Reports indicate that the patent dispute between Reckitt Benckiser and Dr Reddy's that was first ruled upon in 2014 has
taken a vicious turn, as an
appeal against the 2014
decision that a patent for «Suboxone Film» was not infringed upon has been rejected.
In a recent Texas auto accident
decision, a woman
appealed from a
take nothing judgment after a jury trial in her personal injury lawsuit
against a defendant, claiming injuries when the defendant's vehicle hit hers from behind.
Whatever the scope of Apple's
appeal against the ITC may be, I believe Apple has realistic chances of winning a better outcome, but this will
take time before the CAFC hands down its
decision on this
appeal.
Re K (removal from the jurisdiction: practice) 1999 2 FLR 1084 was the mother's
appeal against the court's
decision to grant the father permission to
take their only child (age 10) for a holiday to his paternal place of birth in Bangladesh.
An analysis producing the result that the court did not have jurisdiction to hear the secretary of state's
appeals would
take the form: (i) the Social Security Act 1998 (SSA 1998), s 15 provided for an
appeal against «any
decision of a Commissioner»; (ii) the «
decision» in each of the cases was to be found in para 1, dismissing the claimant's
appeal; (iii) the secretary of state was not seeking to challenge that
decision; (iv) by analogy with Lake v Lake [1955] 2 All ER 538, he had no right to challenge the reasoning on an issue upon which he was unsuccessful — jurisdiction — when the ultimate
decision was wholly favourable to him.