For my earlier post on the Federal Court of Appeal's decision in Clyde River see here and for my note on the two leave to
appeal applications see here.
Not exact matches
I am particularly pleased to
see that our
application appeals to both genders and all age groups.
Lord Pearson [at 682] contrasted this with the position where
application is made after the time for
appeal has expired (eg, per a Barder
appeal in financial remedy proceedings —
see Barder v Barder (Caluori Intervening)[1988] AC 20, [1987] 2 All ER 440): in such a case the end of litigation has been definitely reached, subject only to the court's power to extend the time.
In the High Court (subject to any specific rules: as yet there are none) and in the Family Court,
applications to set aside must be by way of
appeal and subject to the fresh action point in Gohill (
see below).
Yet some Art 6 rights are capable of being signed away — such as the right to a public hearing (
see Bramelid and Malmstrom v Sweden (
Applications 8588, 8589/79)(1982) 29 DR 64, and B (
appeal: lack of reasons), Re [2003] EWCA Civ 881, [2003] 2 FLR 1035).
After the Supreme Court of Canada denied an
application for leave to
appeal in early February, I revisited Oudin to
see if lawyers now know something about its meaning.
Lord Glennie followed, though was not bound by, the English Court of
Appeal decision in R (B) v Crown Court at Stafford [2006] EWHC 1654 (Admin), [2007] 1 WLR 1524 (that a victim claimant was entitled to notice of an accused's
application to
see her medical records (Crown Court rules have now been amended to recognise this right)-RRB-.
In Canada, the Federal Court of
Appeal reviewed Amazon.com's «one - click» patent
application (
see 2011 FCA 328) and considered that a patent
application where the single point of novelty was a new algorithm or mathematical formula was not patentable subject matter but did not foreclose the patenting of «business methods».
The Court of
Appeal stated providing notice to the Attorneys General is «not required» (
see para. 70), but acknowledged doing so has become the practice on these
applications.
As such, the
Application Judge's findings at the first step of the test were entitled to deference from the Court of
Appeal (
see para. 6).
On
appeal, the City argues the
Application Judge erred in drawing the following five conclusions (
see para. 29):
Whereas the Chambers Judge found that, «[f] or the purposes of his
application, the defendant accepts that the Crown made this Social Covenant...», and that the doctrine of the honour of the Crown could be applicable (
see at paras. 24 - 25), the Court of
Appeal disagreed, finding «The idea that inspirational statements by a prime minister containing vague assurances could bind the Government of Canada to a specific legislative regime in perpetuity does not, in any way, conform with the country's constitutional norms».
Belway v Lalande - Weber is a decision that Justice Martin made in her role as a single Court of
Appeal judge deciding whether to grant an applicant leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal; see Granting a Vexatious Litigant's Application for Leave to A
Appeal judge deciding whether to grant an applicant leave to
appeal to the Court of Appeal; see Granting a Vexatious Litigant's Application for Leave to A
appeal to the Court of
Appeal; see Granting a Vexatious Litigant's Application for Leave to A
Appeal;
see Granting a Vexatious Litigant's
Application for Leave to
AppealAppeal.
The Court of
Appeal emphasised the importance of making prompt
applications for judicial review against deportation decisions and set out the principles to be followed in future cases —
see the judgment of Lord Justice Buxton at para 17.
The function of the Court of
Appeal on an application for permission to appeal in a residence and contact case is limited to a review of the decision of the judge to see whether a prospective appellant has an arguable case that the judge's order was plainly
Appeal on an
application for permission to
appeal in a residence and contact case is limited to a review of the decision of the judge to see whether a prospective appellant has an arguable case that the judge's order was plainly
appeal in a residence and contact case is limited to a review of the decision of the judge to
see whether a prospective appellant has an arguable case that the judge's order was plainly wrong:
In the Alberta Court of
Appeal (
see my comment), Slatter J.A. had insisted that a «mechanical and formalistic» approach to judicial review was inappropriate, preferring to identify several contextual factors that justified the
application of a correctness standard.
2.1.25
See paragraph 3.1.7 of Practice Direction 3 for the documents which must be filed with an
application for permission to
appeal.
The Tsuu T'ina's
application for leave to
appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was denied on October 30, 2008 (
see 2008 CanLII 55966).
254, 254.1); (3)
applications can be brought for orders for the production of their maintenance logs —
see the decisions that have cited R. v. Kilpatrick, 2013 ABQB 5 (paras. 48 - 99), leave to
appeal refused, R. v. Kilpatrick 2013 ABCA 168; and, (4) in relation to such evidence, the National Standards of Canada for electronic records management were applied in, R. v. Oler, 2014 ABPC 130.
Judge Meeran's announcement follows the recent Employment
Appeal Tribunal ruling in Johns v Solent SD Ltd, that the claim should be deferred pending the outcome of the Heyday case: R (on the
application of Incorporated Trustees of the National Council on Aging) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (
see this issue p 1651).
FINAL THOUGHTS: Make it a goal to get your resume read by an actual person (
see: Network Your Way to a New Job) and apply these formatting strategies to
appeal to the human eye, but know when to modify formatting as needed for ATS
applications.
«To make a good impression during our
application process, you need to be incredibly specific on why Sky
appeals to you - for instance, did a product, service or campaign that you've
seen stand out for you and make you want to apply?»
If you are making an
appeal you should complete the
appeals application form and send it to the Appeals Administration Unit of the Department of Education and Skills - see «Where to apply»
appeals application form and send it to the
Appeals Administration Unit of the Department of Education and Skills - see «Where to apply»
Appeals Administration Unit of the Department of Education and Skills -
see «Where to apply» below.