Sentences with phrase «appeal cases involving»

How often do Appellants win bankruptcy appeal cases involving Chapter 11 Adversary Proceedings

Appeared in Uzinterimpex v Standard Bank [2008] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 456, a major Court of Appeal case involving allegations of a fraudulent call by a London bank on an advance payment guarantee, constructive trust and conversion.

The judge focussed on the Objectives of the Divorce Act and use of capital to generate income and he cited Another BC Court of Appeal case involving a of 4 million property settlement where lump sum support was paid:

Not exact matches

Despite the fact that at least five of the judges involved in the two appeal court judgements were originally appointed to lower courts by Brian Mulroney's Conservative government, Harper insisted: «It was the government that decided to put the judges on the bench, the government that decided not to appeal, the government that decided to lose the case and the government that decided not to come back to Parliament.

But other courts in that Court of Appeal's jurisdiction would be required to use it when judging future cases involving Uber driver classification.

Non-judicial foreclosures are generally faster and easier for lenders to execute than the judicial process, which involves a court, along with lawsuits and appeals in some cases.

ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, stated that the ACCC believed «that there was sufficient evidence for the Court to find that Cussons had entered into an understanding» and that the appeal will allow the Full Court to «consider whether the trial judge should have inferred an understanding involving Cussons based on the uncontested evidence in this case.»

For the good of player, club and English football, Oldham must avoid signing Evans, let the court case and appeals run their course, and let all involved move on with their lives.

Former state Assemblyman William Boyland Jr. has asked a federal appeals panel to set him free because last year's Supreme Court decision narrowed the reach of federal anti-corruption laws in a case involving former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.

The removal of independent appeal panels are against natural justice and are likely to involve headteachers in expensive court cases.

Mr. Lally's past practice has included successfully representing President George W. Bush before the Miami - Dade and Orange County Boards of Election at the 2000 Florida Recounts; handling numerous complex corporate reorganizations involving multi-jurisdictional assets; recovering priceless stolen art from an international auction house; restructuring of clients» business affairs to reduce their tax and liability exposure; successfully litigating major elections cases and appeals; representing media groups in domestic and international litigation; handling complex domestic relations, divorce, and custody matters; serving as general counsel to numerous corporations in the health care, media, manufacturing, and hospitality industries; and representing parties in multi-national litigation.

The Court of Appeals eventually ruled in Soares» favor but even then - Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman noted the case involved a «personal issue back and forth» between Carter and Soares.

Albany an appeals court will hear arguments in a case involving the ban on fracking that was passed by the town of Dryden.

Another case involved Mr Drabkin as Zoning Board of Appeals chairman allowing a Use Variance when throughout the process he kept repeating (it's in the minutes!)

«I have no doubt that the only reason I am involved in this case, that I was part of this investigation, is to make it more politically appealing and to further Eric Schneiderman's partisan agenda,» Mr. Ortt said.

On the question of when Silver's motion to be given bail pending appeal will be heard, disgraced former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell has once again found his name being tossed around in corruption case involving a former high - profile New York elected official.

The New York State Court of Appeals has agreed to hear two cases challenged by the right wing Alliance Defense Fund involving same - sex marriages performed out of state:

The fight against Carl Paladino's removal from the Buffalo School Board is something far more involved than just asking a judge to «appeal» the decision of a lower court; it involves building an entire new case and starting a lawsuit from scratch

According to Abunde,» there is an elected member representing the constituency to be split into two, the commission opined that the case determined by the Court was neither a Pre - Election matter involving candidate nor one of election petition tribunal or appeal.

-- New York Court of Appeals Associate Judge Eugene Fahey, on a case involving whether a chimp has rights

The New York State Court of Appeals has agreed to hear two cases challenged by the right wing Alliance Defense Fund involving same - sex marriages performed out of state: «One case, Godfrey v. Spano, stems from the Westchester County executive's 2... Read

Both the Appeal Court and the Justice himself, should have taken cue from a similar matter involving President Jonathan which was assigned to a Judge from Bayelsa State, but the Honourable Judge disqualified himself on the ground that he may not do justice to the matter and the case was subsequently returned to the FCT Chief Judge for re-assignment to another Judge from another state.

The Supreme Court is also likely to consider one of several cases involving conceal carry rights in the future because of conflicting rulings from intermediate courts of appeal, Donohue said.

Less than a month after a New York state appeals court ruled that chimpanzees do not have legal rights and can not be released from captivity, a case involving a second chimp has been dismissed

Recent examples include the appeal for dozens of forensic science students to assist in the case involving the missing women in British Columbia, as well as the Chandra Levy case in the United States.

Biotech companies got a break today when a U.S. appeals court handed down a long - awaited ruling on gene patents in a case prompted by a suit involving Myriad Genetics of Salt Lake City.

In fact, Mandy's undeniable appeal has even been known to elicit reckless acts of hormonal abandon among her peers; case in point: last year's tragic events, involving her loyal but slightly odd bestie, Emmet (Michael Welch), and the school's resident jock, Dylan (Adam Powell).

And in another case that has gained widespread attention, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit last week refused to delay implementation of a voluntary student - desegregation plan involving public schools in St. Louis and its suburbs.

In its decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit parted ways with the rulings of two other federal appeals courts in similar cases, involving teachers in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18,Appeals for the Second Circuit parted ways with the rulings of two other federal appeals courts in similar cases, involving teachers in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18,appeals courts in similar cases, involving teachers in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18, 1983.)

A federal appeals court has declined to rehear a case involving high school students who were not allowed to wear American flag shirts to school on the day of a Cinco de Mayo celebration.

In ruling on the due - process question, the appeals court overturned a district court's decision to dismiss the case, which involved a San Antonio science teacher's claim that he was «constructively discharged «3from his position without a hearing prior to his dismissal.

The case involves appeals of rulings by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit against two educational institutappeals of rulings by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit against two educational institutAppeals for the Fourth Circuit against two educational institutions...

A 43 - year - old desegregation case involving the Hillsborough County, Fla., school system came to an end last week, as the U.S. Supreme Court declined to disturb a federal appeals court ruling that the district was no longer segregated.

In the Supreme Court brief, which addresses two consolidated cases, Tustin Unified School District v. K.M. and Poway Unified School District v. D.H., NSBA and the California School Boards Association encourage the U.S. Supreme Court to hear these cases, contending that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit misapplied the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), rather than correctly applying IDEA, to a case involving a California student with a hearing impairment.

The petition to have the case heard by the state Supreme Court — which would have saved time and money for all involved — is denied as premature and appeal briefs are prepared.

The decision is one of several in recent months by federal appeals courts grappling with cases involving students who create Web pages ridiculing school administrators or fellow students.

Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., the lead counsel for the students, said the state supreme court has a history of reviewing cases involving education so he thinks it is likely the court will hear their appeal.

Mansour v. King deals with due process in dangerous dog cases and is very clear about the standards and rules for the case, appeals and keeping of records involved.

One of the most notable legal challenges was in 2004 wherein the court denied the Idaho Power Co. appeal of a $ 17 million judgment in a stray - voltage case again involving dairy cows.

Earlier this month the Court of Appeals of Indiana ruled (via Deliberations) in an interesting case that involved a jury deciding that a plaintiff should be awarded $ 336,300 in damages, but failing to adequately communicate that to the court because of confusion about how the verdict form worked.

In Re: L - W (children)(contact order: committal)[2010] EWCA Civ 1253, [2010] All ER (D) 62 (Nov), the Court of Appeal reviewed the line of authorities on cases involving committal applications and set out a summary of the approach the court should take:

The Supreme Court of Canada will hear five appeals this week, including three criminal cases involving driving «over 80» and production of evidence; an unjust enrichment claim; and an appeal in a sexual assault case in which the Court of Appeal of Alberta had found that a trial judge had erred by relying on a stereotype about the behaviour of sexual assault viappeal in a sexual assault case in which the Court of Appeal of Alberta had found that a trial judge had erred by relying on a stereotype about the behaviour of sexual assault viAppeal of Alberta had found that a trial judge had erred by relying on a stereotype about the behaviour of sexual assault victims.

The court is also hearing a case involving solicitor - client privilege in Quebec, as well as a curious tax case where the authority increased its own assessment after a taxpayer appeal.

On appeal the Cains argued that the trial court erred by giving Instruction 10 which included language that noted «punitive damages are generally not favored and should be awarded only in cases involving egregious conduct.»

This case involved Ms Kaur, a nurse, who argued that her employer's instigation, handling and outcome (a final written warning, upheld at internal appeal) of its disciplinary process following her altercation with a colleague, was unreasonable such that it amounted to a repudiatory breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence.

But the WSIA's restrictive approach to mental stress claims (as compared to its more expansive approach to claims involving a physical injury) is now under constitutional scrutiny as a result of a recent case of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal («WSIAT»).

Barring a legal defect, he found insurers with cases involving awards under $ 100,000 were the most likely to avoid appealing or later abandon it, and those that reached hearings tended to be upheld.

«Court Urges Review of New York Judge's Immigration Cases That Are on Appeal»: The New York Times today contains an article that begins, «In a move that immigration lawyers say is highly unusual, a federal appeals court has recommended that a Justice Department appeals board review all immigration cases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking asCases That Are on Appeal»: The New York Times today contains an article that begins, «In a move that immigration lawyers say is highly unusual, a federal appeals court has recommended that a Justice Department appeals board review all immigration cases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking aAppeal»: The New York Times today contains an article that begins, «In a move that immigration lawyers say is highly unusual, a federal appeals court has recommended that a Justice Department appeals board review all immigration cases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking ascases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking aappeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking asylum.

Recently, a reporter for WBAP Radio in Fort Worth spoke to her about the challenges involved in appealing a divorce case.

The British Columbia Court of Appeal recently ruled on a case involving an Alzheimer's patient and her ability to give consent.