Sentences with phrase «appeal considering»

For those upgrading from Redmi Note 4 or Redmi Note 3, the newer Pro version might have more of an appeal considering the specifications, but then this is also the more expensive variant.

Southwark LBC v Akhtar Upper Tribunal (2017)--(led by Philip Rainey QC) representing the landlord in an appeal considering the enforceability of service charge covenants and the mechanics of recovery.

Also I definitely would say it's not going for anything resembling mass appeal considering how bizarre that series can get.

It's one of those things with obvious appeal considering how many people tote smartphones, but you won't see something like it in other three - row SUVs.

The idea that we will get to reunite with our family members in some fluffy cloud palace is very appealing considering how long we are going to be dead.

Pants slit up the sides are especially appealing considering the Indian summer we're currently having in NYC.

The simplicity of a shift dress was appealing considering how incredibly comfy they are, and this one adorned with crocheted flowers couldn't have been more perfect for a 21st century hippie, even more perfect??

The $ 199 price tag seems very appealing considering it's just below half of what the iPad 2 currently sells for but you could be inadvertently selling yourself short by purchasing this version of the Kindle E-reader.

The visuals are good enough to get the point across but it still would not have hurt to make it look more appealing considering how far along we are in the Wii's life cycle.

The Court of Appeal considered that should those claims succeed the assets would revert back to the original owner, not to the individual plaintiffs seeking the declaration.

Recently, the Singapore Court of Appeal considered in Wee Shuo Woon v HT SRL4 whether privilege still attached to confidential documents published online as a result of a cyberattack on the defendant company.

In this case the Court of Appeal considered whether an employee who was summarily withdrawn from his post as High Commissioner was entitled to damages for depression.

These appeals considered whether Immigration Act 1971, s 3C automatically extends a person's leave to remain pending the determination of an application to extend leave to remain, notwithstanding that the original application is invalid.

This appeal considered, where a deprivation or forfeiture order is wrongly made during a period of postponement of confiscation proceedings (contrary to Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, s 15 (2)-RRB-, whether the effect of s 14 (12) is that a subsequent (and substantial) procedural error may in itself deprive the court of jurisdiction to make a confiscation order.

In deciding the case, the Court of Appeal considered a lawyer's duty to give advice outside of his written retainer.

In Alberta (Securities Commission) v. Brost, [142] the Alberta Court of Appeal considered whether the rule in Brosseau applied to AMPs.

In the recent case of Meridian Credit Union Limited v Baig, 1 the Court of Appeal considered the duties owed by various parties to be honest and to not mislead each other during the course of real estate transactions.

This appeal considered whether the High Court erred in holding that the provisions of the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009, which prevent the defendant from relying on the «reasonable belief» defence, specifically s 39 (2)(a)(i), are compatible with ECHR, arts 6, 8 and 14.

On appeal from [2014] EWCA Crim 748 This appeal considered whether, when a defendant pleads not guilty to murder on...

On appeal from [2014] CSIH 61 This appeal considered whether there is an intermediate sanction open to the GPC Fitness to...

On appeal from [2015] EWCA Crim 305 This appeal considered, where a deprivation or forfeiture order is wrongly made during a...

In Economical Mutual Insurance v. Caughty, the Ontario Court of Appeal considered whether a person who tripped over a parked motorcycle was entitled to statutory accident benefits (SABS).

This appeal considered whether the Respondent erred in law in refusing to refer the Appellant's rape conviction case to the High Court.

In Private Career Training Institutions Agency v. Vancouver Career College2., the BC Court of Appeal considered similar issues.

These appeals considered whether the requirement that an applicant who formed a relationship with a British citizen whilst in the UK unlawfully must demonstrate «insurmountable obstacles» to be granted leave to remain in the UK under the Immigration Rules is compliant with the ECHR, art 8.

The Federal Court of Appeal considered Mr. Grenon's claim both as a claim of direct discrimination and adverse effects discrimination.

This appeal considered whether a commissioning body can, by its decision not to fund a particular option for contact, remove the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection to make a best interests decision about contact, and whether the failure to conduct a best interests assessment and / or determine the facts breached the appellant's rights under the ECHR to a fair trial and a family life.

The Court of Appeal considered the question of whether the sum was too extravagant, having regard to the range of damages which the innocent party was likely to suffer, that it could not constitute a genuine estimate of the damages that he could have suffered.

This appeal considered what the true construction of the words «in a series of related matters or transactions» is within the aggregation clause of a professional indemnity insurance policy.

In Re D [2016], the Court of Appeal considered whether a Romanian court order should be enforced where a child was not given «an opportunity to be heard» on parental responsibility.

Applying that approach to the facts in Morris, the Court of Appeal considered that the judge's approach to the application had not been too restrictive: it had been light touch, but, in the circumstances, not to the extent that the judge could be said to have failed to undertake the statutory exercise required by MCA 1973, s 31.

On the question in the instant action of whether to grant an injunction or make an ASBO in substantially similar terms, given the criminal standard of proof applying to ASBOs, the Court of Appeal considered it «would be bizarre, not to say irrational, if the standard of proof in answering the two questions were different».

Thus the Court of Appeal considers mostly only the «big money» cases tried at first instance by Family Division judges.

In KPMG v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 363, [2007] All ER (D) 245 (Apr), the Court of Appeal considered the interpretation of a break clause in a lease from which it was apparent that some critical words had been omitted.

The employee appealed, and the Court of Appeal considered whether the trial judge had misapplied the test for constructive dismissal.

The Court of Appeals considered this issue in Webb v. Charles, 611 P. 2d 562 (1980).

In doing so, the Court of Appeal considered whether the orders in council needed to exactly mirror the relevant UNSC resolutions.

A case of particular interest in the regulatory context is CITIC Pacific Ltd v. Secretary for Justice and anor, [160] in which the Hong Kong Court of Appeal considered the application of the crime - fraud exception in the context of alleged fraud and breach of listing rules by a company (CITIC) listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

In a decision released in June this year, Bowes v. Goss Power Products Ltd. (2012 ONCA 424), the Ontario Court of Appeal considered the application of this principle of mitigation where an employment contract provided a fixed amount of severance upon termination.

This appeal considered whether, when a defendant pleads not guilty to murder on the grounds of diminshed responsibility, the judge must direct the jury as to the meaning of «substantial» for the purposes of the phase «substantially impaired» in the Homicide Act 1957, s 2 (1)(b).

The appeal considered whether, in disregarding the increase or diminution in value of a site acquired compulsorily that was attributable to other land subject to the same compulsory purchase order, it was permissible to modify the planning status of the site in question.

In its decision, the Federal Court of Appeal considered four issues: whether the Colony of British Columbia had breached its pre-emption legislation; whether the Colony had breached a fiduciary duty by allowing the village lands to be settled; Canada's liability for the Colony's breaches under the Specific Claim's Tribunal Act; and whether Canada's post-Confederation allotments of Band reserves remedied any potential breaches and fulfilled any possible fiduciary duties owed.

In a recent decision issued on January 18, 2011, the Ontario Court of Appeal considered, for the first time, whether independent contractors should be counted when determining whether a JHSC must be established and maintained.

In Waterman v Boyle [2009] EWCA Civ 115, the Court of Appeal considered the vexed question of whether (or rather, when) a right to park will be implied in a right of way.

On appeal from [2016] CSIH 51 This appeal considered whether the Inner House erred in failing to hold that, in...

In the unconnected case of R (Newhaven Port and Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council [2015] UKSC 7 (read our blog here) the Court of Appeal considered whether a beach and harbour could be a town or village green.

Following on from a judgment made by The Court of Justice of the European Communities This appeal considered whether...

This appeal considered whether the majority of the Extra Division of the Inner House...

This appeal considered, where a pension is calculable by reference to service, whether the period of service prior to the coming into effect of the relevant Directive should be taken into account in calculating the amount of pension to be paid.

In R v Giroux the Alberta Court of Appeal considered a Crown appeal from a sentence which brought these numerous contradictions of the sentencing process into clear view.