If you read what I wrote, I said that
I appeal to authority when there is something that I don't have the knowledge or training to interpret and the authority obviously does.
Why
appeal to authority when the person writing this article possesses only credentials that are easily trumped by many many scientists who would disagree with her.
But: (1) often, I see «skeptics» building straw men out of valid arguments that expertise should not be dismissed out of hand, and (2) I often see selective reasoning from «skeptics» where they denounce «realist» arguments as
appealing to authority when they then turn right around and appeal to their own authorities.
Not exact matches
It is deeply unjust
to use religion
to legitimate your own
authority, an
authority which extends
to commanding others
to kill or risk death, and then,
when it suits you, limit
appeals to that source of
authority from which you sought recognition and blessing.
Fourth, it's highly ironic that Brian
appeals to higher denominational
authority to review the «evidence»,
when he himself is unwilling
to submit
to any leadership, being an independent pastor (correct me if I'm wrong here please)
«
When those cases are
appealed up
to responsible bodies of lawyers, judges and administrators, a vast number and even a sizable majority of them are thrown out, because these
authorities are trained
to examine evidence and
to evaluate it.
Try not
to use him as too large an
appeal to authority, it's like
when people only seem
to know Einstein's name but Fermi, Dirac, Pauli, etc all seem
to be mentioned by few, despite being as equally competent.
When interests conflict, it is natural
to resort
to force, since it is assumed that there is no higher
authority to which
appeal can be made for settlement of differences.
Paul and others will make an
appeal to their
authority as apostles
when necessary, or they will say it is a custom, or a hymn; it's not that hard, really,
when anyone reads the whole thing instead of just verses.
The
appeal court added that since the House of Representatives or any chamber of the National Assembly lacked the power
to conduct criminal investigation, its report «can not be used
to prevent or shield any of the petroleum marketer and supply companies from being investigated by competent investigative
authority upon a criminal complaint that it fraudulently received billions of naira as imported petroleum subsidy payments
when it did not import or market the petroleum in Nigeria.»
NYCOM said the Court of
Appeals got it right
when it said «local governments should not be required
to surrender their
authority and negotiate disciplinary procedures under circumstances
when the Legislature has expressly granted disciplinary
authority to local officials.»
Public Advocate Letitia James has lost another lawsuit against a city agency
when a mid-level
appeals court restated on Tuesday that her office doesn't have the
authority to sue.
Local and state education
authorities could use it
when assessing performance, for example, in hearing an
appeal from a school that failed
to meet its AYP goals.
The Washington
Appeals Court ruled that the FAA has the
authority to change its rules, including those for electronics on planes,
when it wants
to.
By some accounts, Google's 2010 purchase of the onetime Port
Authority building at 111 Eighth Avenue, which occupies an entire city block, drove up commercial rents in the area, but this is a 10 -
to -15-minute walk
to the heart of the art district, an eternity
when it comes
to the storefronts that
appeal to galleries.
There is a legitimate place for
appeals to authority,
when that
authority has the necessary skills and applies proper scepticism and documents it.
I was in court
when Ms Reilly's genial co-counsel made his argument for Mann, which was a straightforward
appeal to authority: Why, all these eminent acronymic bodies, from the EPA and NSF and NOAA even unto HMG in London, have proved that all criticisms of Mann are false and without merit.
How can Rapley's epic
appeal to authority be legitimised,
when it is presented in such a way as
to deprive it of the virtue that legitimises it?
As usual,
when the proponents of CAGW have been unnterly defeated in the scientific argument, they come back
to the «
appeal to authority».
It pays
to remember this
when the nonsense about 91 %
to 100 % consensus is thrown around, it is very much just a peer pressure version of
appeal to authority.
When an argument invokes an
authority and
appeals to this
authority, as Chewbacca's doing right now with the Auditor, questioning that
authority is quite kosher.
Is
appeal to authority valid
when you are
appealing to a view you agree with?
When the DC
appeals court ruled that the EPA had the
authority to regulate greenhouse gases on June 26, 2012, it brought
to a close a process of regulation and court challenges that started in 1999.
All I'm asking is that
when research is revealed
to be flawed, the scientists defend themselves through open debate rather than bullying and cover ups and — yes —
appeals to authority like the one we saw on Nurse's disgraceful, dishonest hatchet job.
«Why should I trust your opinion anyway, you claim
to be more qualified than me
to decide what treatment is best but that's just
appeal to authority and I have a PhD myself you know, and you were a bit rude
to me
when I came in last time and I read that you were fiddling your taxes so how can I trust your professional judgement?
I have a PhD in Chemistry, can follow the gist of scientific argument, and can usually decipher
when someone's blowing smoke (particularly wrt
to «peer review» and
appeals to authority), so my BS detector sometimes leads me into less constructive engagements.
Now
when pressed
to provide anything other than generalities you
appeal to some unnamed
authorities that it couldn't possibly have been 5 degrees warmer in the past and point us
to «the literature» which you claim has been dismissed.
Not sure where this comment will fall, but is a response
to eadler2 -
when all your arguments are shown
to be absurd,
appeal to authority... but, but, 97 %.
Actually, kim, my point is that
appealing to authority is often not fallacious, but that «skeptics» ignore that distinction on a regular basis; it seems that the working theory is that
appealing to authority is never fallacious
when they do so and always fallacious
when «realists» do so.
Appeals to authority are fallacious
when one claims that the person in
authority can't be wrong.
However, a court may reduce (modify)
to include any of the requirements relating
to probation and community control, a legal sentence imposed by it within 60 days of its imposition; after the receipt by the court of a mandate issued by the appellate court upon affirmance of the judgment and / or sentence upon an original
appeal; after receipt by the court of a certified copy of an order of the appellate court dismissing an original
appeal from the judgment and / or sentence; or if further appellate review is sought in a higher court or in successively higher courts, after the highest state or federal court
to which a timely
appeal has been taken under
authority of law, or
when a petition for certiorari has been timely filed under
authority of law, has written an order of affirmance or an order dismissing the
appeal and / or denying certiorari.
Four issues had been identified by the parties: (i) whether the Court of
Appeal had correctly held that the 2009 and 2010 care plan reviews were
to be read as including a reassessment of the claimant's community care needs; (ii) whether the
authority's decision
to provide pads interfered with the claimant's Art 8 rights and, if so, whether such an interference was justified and proportionate; (iii) whether the
authority had been operating any relevant policy or practice for the purposes of s 21E (1) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995) and, if so, whether that policy was justified as a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim, namely the equitable allocation of limited care resources; and (iv) whether the
authority had failed
to have due regard
to the needs specified in s 49A of DDA 1995 (the general disability equality duty)
when carrying out their functions in the instant case.
This
appeal considered whether, when varying a consent order, the court should apply the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 31, or whether it is constrained by Court of Appeal authority to apply a narrower approach, even if that is inconsistent with the children's inte
appeal considered whether,
when varying a consent order, the court should apply the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 31, or whether it is constrained by Court of
Appeal authority to apply a narrower approach, even if that is inconsistent with the children's inte
Appeal authority to apply a narrower approach, even if that is inconsistent with the children's interests.
This
appeal considered the scope of enquiries required of a local
authority when making decisions in homelessness cases
to which the Equality Act 2010, s 149 applies, and the standard of review
to be applied by courts
when reviewing decisions of the local
authority in such cases.
When matters can not be resolved with the governmental
authorities to our clients» satisfaction, we represent them in tax and trade litigation before all relevant courts, and at all levels of court, including before the Tax Court of Canada, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal, the Federal Court and Federal Court of
Appeal, and the Supreme Court of Canada.
Noteable cases: J v Lambeth - in which the Court of
Appeal confirmed the necessity for the local housing
authority to send the applicant a «minded
to» letter under Regulation 8 (2)
when it had determined that the original section 184 decision was flawed.
Top DOJ officials have until March 8
to decide whether
to ask the U.S. Court of
Appeals to reconsider its conclusion that Obama overstepped his
authority last year
when he used his recess appointment power
to install three members on the National Labor Relations Board.
«[T] he weight of
authority suggests that accurate news reporting — even
when it is likely
to have an adverse impact on the subjects of the report — usually does not give rise
to an action for intentional infliction of emotional distress»: Yesterday, a unanimous three - judge panel of the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a decision affirming a federal district court's dismissal of claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress asserted by two former undercover police officers against a television station in Albuquerque that had revealed their identities and their undercover status in the context of a televised report about their suspected involvement in an alleged incident of sexual assault.
And this is what I understand
to be the meaning of our lawyers,
when they say that these civil corporations are liable
to no visitation; that is, that the law having by immemorial usage appointed them
to be visited and inspected by the king their founder, in his majesty's court of king's bench, according
to the rules of the common law, they ought not
to be visited elsewhere, or by any other
authority.53 And this is so strictly true, that though the king by his letters patent had subjected the college of physicians
to the visitation of four very respectable persons, the lord chancellor, the two chief justices, and the chief baron; though the college had accepted this carter with all possible marks of acquiescence, and had acted under it for near a century; yet, in 1753, the
authority of this provision coming in dispute, on an
appeal preferred
to these supposed visitors, they directed the legality of their own appointment
to be argued: and, as this college was a mere civil, and not an eleemosynary foundation, they at length determined, upon several days solemn debate, that they had no jurisdiction as visitors; and remitted the appellant (if aggrieved)
to his regular remedy in his majesty's court of king's bench.
The Court of
Appeal set out, reviewed, analysed and applied the
authorities going back
to Swain v Hillman [1999] EWCA Crim 2251, [2001] 1 All ER 91 on the issue of
when summary judgment was appropriate under CPR Pt 24.
The main thrust of her
appeal was that in the light of the incorporation of the Convention into domestic law, by virtue of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) coming into force in October 2000, a local
authority may owe a duty of care
to a parent of a child
when exercising, through social workers, its duties
to protect children from their parents by placing the children on the child protection register.
A recent decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court of
Appeals quotes a local aphorism that underscores the importance of specificity
when citing either
to the record or legal
authority.
«The FRDI Bill supersedes all previous Acts and there is no need for this Bill
when we already have proper regulators like the RBI and the Insurance Regulatory and Development
Authority», Das told this business daily, adding that the FRDA Bill will also snatch away workers» and companies» rights
to appeal to the Courts.
In a recent decision, Santo v. Santo (citation not yet available), published July 11, 2016, the Maryland Court of
Appeals confirmed a trial judge's
authority to award one party tie - breaking
authority, for legal custody, even
when parents have an inability
to communicate on major decisions affecting the health, education, welfare, religion of a minor child.
When we register your
appeal we will send a copy
to the Local
Authority.
When a written application for benefits, an
appeal or any other declaration under the legislation of a Contracting State is submitted
to a competent
authority or competent institution of the other Contracting State which is competent
to receive similar applications,
appeals or declarations under the legislation of that other Contracting State, that application for benefits,
appeal or declaration shall be deemed
to be submitted on the same date
to the competent
authority or competent institution of the first Contracting State and shall be dealt with according
to the procedure and legislation of the first Contracting State.