Sentences with phrase «appealed a court decision supporting»

The ousted chair has appealed a court decision supporting Sliwa and is awaiting a judge's decision.

Not exact matches

The Ontario Court of Appeal has upheld a decision that a lawyer must personally pay the legal costs of a hospital and a doctor involved in a legal battle with her, over her attempt to remove a client from life support, saying she was «intent on achieving her own personal objective.»

That petition challenges a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision that, as the Cato Institute, Reason Foundation, and a group of law professors explained in a supporting amicus brief, exacerbates a «system» already «stacked in favor of the government.»

The court took up the case after a string of decisions by lower appeals courts supporting the Affordable Care Act's contraceptive mandate was broken.

Suffolk County lawmakers and farmers are supporting the county's decision to appeal a recent New York State Supreme Court ruling that deems development on preserved farmland illegal.

However, the travel ban, which is currently on hold because of a decision by the federal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, has other elected officials in the county, specifically Democrats, worried about Astorino's support for the ban and that it does in fact unfairly target Muslims.

The foldout also includes commitments to «support our public schools» and to «close the $ 4.4 billion annual gap in funding owed by the state to public schools» — a figure apparently derived from the Court of Appeals» 2003 Campagn for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. State decision, which ruled Albany had shortchanged the city billions in education funds.

Making reference to the Courts Act of 1993 (Act 459), Mr Justice Ofoe said Section 31 (2) holds that «an appellate court, on hearing an appeal in a criminal case, shall allow the appeal if the appellate court considers (a) that the verdict or conviction or acquittal ought to be set aside on the ground that it is unreasonable or can not be supported having regard to the evidence, or (b) that the judgement in question ought to be set aside as a wrong decision on a question of law or fact, or (c) that there was a miscarriage of justice, and in any other case shall dismiss the appeal.»

The Ekiti State Governor and Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party Governors» Forum, Ayodele Fayose, has reiterated his support for the decision of the Senator Ahmed Makarfi led Caretaker Committee to challenge the Court of Appeal, Port - Harcourt judgment on the leadership crisis in the party.

While the mayor supports same - sex marriage, some advocates have not forgiven him for appealing a 2005 court decision that supported same - sex marriage and for backing Senate Republicans opposed to the unions.»

But the High Court ruled that NHS England does have the legal power to commission PrEP, a decision that has now been supported by three Court of Appeal judges, who decided to rule in favour of the National Aids Trust.

This Court of Appeals decision is not supported by Maryland's dog bite record.

The commission makes 100 recommendations featuring six overarching ones: the National Advice and Legal Support Fund mentioned before; prioritising public legal education in schools, alongside financial literacy, and in «education for life»; calling on government to clampdown down «preventable demand» by getting decisions right the first time including a «polluter pays» scheme for the DWP to pay costs on upheld appeals (on average 35 % of appeals against welfare benefits decisions are upheld); an overhaul of the courts to make them better suited for the needs of litigants in person; a national strategy for 2015 — 20, including a «minister for advice and legal support»; and for local authorities to commission local advice and legal supportSupport Fund mentioned before; prioritising public legal education in schools, alongside financial literacy, and in «education for life»; calling on government to clampdown down «preventable demand» by getting decisions right the first time including a «polluter pays» scheme for the DWP to pay costs on upheld appeals (on average 35 % of appeals against welfare benefits decisions are upheld); an overhaul of the courts to make them better suited for the needs of litigants in person; a national strategy for 2015 — 20, including a «minister for advice and legal support»; and for local authorities to commission local advice and legal supportsupport»; and for local authorities to commission local advice and legal supportsupport plans.

The Ontario Court of Appeal has upheld a decision that a lawyer must personally pay the legal costs of a hospital and a doctor involved in a legal battle with her, over her attempt to remove a client from life support, saying she was «intent on achieving her own personal objective.»

A federal appeals court vacated the conviction last year, however, because jury instructions didn't reflect a later U.S. Supreme Court decision narrowing the meaning of official acts that can support a federal bribery conviccourt vacated the conviction last year, however, because jury instructions didn't reflect a later U.S. Supreme Court decision narrowing the meaning of official acts that can support a federal bribery convicCourt decision narrowing the meaning of official acts that can support a federal bribery conviction.

The appellate court judges are required to presume the jury's decisions at trial were correct — as long as the record on appeal contains evidence to support the jury's verdict.

The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the trial judge, who used the Guidelines to determine spousal support but concluded that any economic disadvantage suffered by Mrs. Fisher as a result of the marriage was not sufficient to warrant indefinite support.

Tags: Child Support, South Carolina Court of Appeals Posted in Child Support, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments»

Form FL - 1 — Statement of Claim for Divorce Form FL - 2 — Statement of Claim for Division of Matrimonial Property Form FL - 3 — Statement of Claim for Divorce and Division of Matrimonial Property Form FL - 4 — Statement of Defence Form FL - 5 — Counterclaim for Divorce Form FL - 6 — Counterclaim for Division of Matrimonial Property Form FL - 7 — Counterclaim for Divorce and Division of Matrimonial Property Form FL - 8 — Joint Statement of Claim for Divorce Form FL - 10 — FLA Claim Form FL - 11 — Response — Family Law Act Form FL - 12 — Certificate of Lawyer Form FL - 13 — Protection Order Questionnaire Form FL - 14 — Restraining Order Application Form FL - 15 — Notice to Produce an Affidavit of Records Form FL - 16 — Notice to Reply to Written Interrogatories Application Form FL - 17 — Notice to Disclose — Application Form FL - 18 — Family Application Form FL - 19 — Provisional Order Information Form FL - 20 — Notice of Confirmation Hearing Form FL - 21 — Request for Divorce (Without Oral Evidence) Form FL - 22 — Joint Request for Divorce (Without Oral Evidence) Form FL - 23 — Affidavit of Applicant Form FL - 24 — Affidavit of Applicants (Joint) Form FL - 25 — Divorce Judgment (without oral evidence) Form FL - 26 — DJ and Corollary Relief Order Form FL - 27 — Corollary Relief Order Form FL - 28 — Variation Order Form FL - 29 — Exclusive Possession Order Form FL - 30 — Restraining Order Without Notice Form FL - 31 — Restraining Order Form FL - 33 — Notice of Appeal — Provincial Court Order (Family Law Act) Form FL - 34 — Adult's Statement — Guardianship of Child Form FL - 35 — Child's Statement — Guardianship of Child Form FL - 36 — Statement — Terminate Guardianship Form FL - 37 — Statement — Review of Guardian's Significant Decision Form FL - 38 — Statement — Court Direction Form FL - 39 — Statement — Parenting Form FL - 40 — Statement — Parenting (Sole Guardian) Form FL - 45 — Statement — Child Support Form FL - 46 — Recipient's Statement — Vary Child Support Form FL - 47 — Payor's Statement — Vary Child Support Form FL - 48 — Statement — Spousal Partner Support Form FL - 49 — Recipient's Statement — Vary Spousal Partner Support Form FL - 50 — Payor's Statement — Vary Spousal Partner Support Form FL - 51 — Statement — Enforcement of Time With a Child Summary of Child Support Guideline Undue Hardship Claim

Tags: Alimony / Spousal Support, Rehabilitative Alimony, South Carolina Court of Appeals Posted in Alimony / Spousal Support, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 6 Comments»

Importance: The Court of Appeal noted support decisions are fact driven, involve considerable discretion, and should not be overturned unless the decisions reveals: 1) an error in principle; 2) a significant misapprehension of the evidence; or 3) unless the award is clearly wrong; Hickey v Hickey, [1999] 2 SCR 518 (SCC) at para. 11.

In a rare appellate court decision, the Court of Appeal in Walton v. Alberta (Securities Commission), 2014 ABCA 273, has set aside a decision by the Alberta Securities Commission and has held that any monetary penalties levied must be proportionate to the circumstances of the offender and supported by reacourt decision, the Court of Appeal in Walton v. Alberta (Securities Commission), 2014 ABCA 273, has set aside a decision by the Alberta Securities Commission and has held that any monetary penalties levied must be proportionate to the circumstances of the offender and supported by reaCourt of Appeal in Walton v. Alberta (Securities Commission), 2014 ABCA 273, has set aside a decision by the Alberta Securities Commission and has held that any monetary penalties levied must be proportionate to the circumstances of the offender and supported by reasons.

A new legal advocacy group, The Family Defense Center, today unveiled a Web page designed to solicit amici curiae to support its bid to secure Supreme Court review of a decision of the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Dupuy v. Samuels.

In a decision released on 15 March 2017, overturning the Court of Appeal, the UKSC reminds courts that when considering claims for financial support from the estate of a deceased, the test is not whether the deceased behaved unreasonably in leaving the will they did.

Appeals in family proceedings (including child support and certain other family related cases) against decisions of magistrates» courts which are initiated on or after 6 April 2009 will go to the county court instead of the High Ccourt instead of the High CourtCourt.

A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision explored how courts address requests made by a spousal support payor who wishes to eliminate their support obligations towards their ex-spouse following retirement.

The Ontario Court of Appeal released a very interesting decision recently, Korman v. Korman, that deals with two important questions that will affect family lawyers» advice on property and support issues.

If you are interested as to whether debts impact the establishment, modification of child support, or the enforcement of a child support order by contempt proceeding, you should read our summary of the Arizona Court of Appeals decision in the Jorgensen v. Jorgensen case on the relationship between child support and debt in Arizona.

Although this appeal does not raise only issues of credibility, I agree with the majority of the Court of Appeal that the trial judge's decision was reasonable, was supported by the evidence and that he had committed no error in the application of the relevant law to the appeal does not raise only issues of credibility, I agree with the majority of the Court of Appeal that the trial judge's decision was reasonable, was supported by the evidence and that he had committed no error in the application of the relevant law to the Appeal that the trial judge's decision was reasonable, was supported by the evidence and that he had committed no error in the application of the relevant law to the facts.

The Appellant attempted to rely on the Court of Appeal's decision in Bongiardina v. Vaughan to support the proposition that by sanding and salting a municipal sidewalk, an adjacent landowner or tenant is not automatically liable for that sidewalk.

The mother appealed this decision, arguing that the lower court had abused its discretion by modifying the legal custody order, which as a result changed the physical custody order, and challenging whether the court abused its discretion by reducing the father's support payments.

This approach finds support in Canada v. Craig, 2012 SCC 43 (CanLII)...» In the result, the British Columbia Court of Appeal overturned the trial judge's decision and upheld the Criminal Code prohibition on physician - assisted dying.

Court decisions that are incorrect under the law or not supported by the facts can be appealed.

We can welcome the brave new world of child support magistrates» court appeals in the county court (I know of two circuit judges who, to my knowledge, have experience of one child support case each; and on the same point they made different decisions — which is relevant, as will be seen below).

While all discretionary decisions face a degree of deference from an appellate court, the added «unfettered» nature of the reconsideration power could be read to support additional deference on appeal.

A recent Alberta Court of Appeal decision focused on ensuring undeclared tax free income was properly taken into account in a child and spousal support dispute.

Consistent with its practice on application for leave to appeal, the Supreme Court of Canada did not issue written reasons in support of its decision to deny leave.

A recent decision of our BC Court of Appeal caught the interest of our founder Lorne N. MacLean, QC on the topic of arbitrated child support awards and how they can be properly varied.

78 In support of its argument that a complete failure to mitigate should lead to a dismissal of a plaintiff's claim, Yellow Pages cites our Court of Appeal's decision in Deputat v Edmonton School District No 7, 2008 ABCA 13 («Deputat «-RRB-.

In a recent decision of the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, Maryland's intermediate appellate court addressed the question of whether a New York resident could be subject to personal jurisdiction in a Maryland paternity and support action based on his filing of an answer to the original complaint for custody, his request for genetic testing, and his request for discoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland, Maryland's intermediate appellate court addressed the question of whether a New York resident could be subject to personal jurisdiction in a Maryland paternity and support action based on his filing of an answer to the original complaint for custody, his request for genetic testing, and his request for discocourt addressed the question of whether a New York resident could be subject to personal jurisdiction in a Maryland paternity and support action based on his filing of an answer to the original complaint for custody, his request for genetic testing, and his request for discovery.

Citing Robles v. Kuhn, 2009 BCSC 1163 for the principle that interim support should only be ordered where a prima facie case for entitlement exists, the Court denied the appeal on the basis that the applicant failed to establish anything clearly wrong with the master's decision.

Tags: Alimony Modification, Attorney's Fees, Cohabitation, South Carolina Court of Appeals Posted in Alimony / Spousal Support, Attorney's Fees, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments»

Tags: Alimony Modification, Alimony / Spousal Support, Cohabitation, Litigation Strategy, South Carolina Court of Appeals Posted in Alimony / Spousal Support, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 2 Comments»

Tags: Attorney's Fees, Child Support, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Jurisprudence, Litigation Strategy, South Carolina Court of Appeals Posted in Attorney's Fees, Child Support, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Jurisprudence, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 2 Comments»

Tags: Alimony / Spousal Support, Cohabitation, South Carolina Court of Appeals Posted in Alimony / Spousal Support, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 5 Comments»

The Court of Appeal reversed the trial decision and awarded spousal support to the wife despite her having received $ 4 million in assets.

Home Employment Law Alberta Court of Appeal decision supports random workplace drug testing in safety - sensitive workplaces

Alberta Court of Appeal decision supports random workplace drug testing in safety - sensitive workplaces

Tags: Attorney's Fees, Child Support, South Carolina Court of Appeals Posted in Attorney's Fees, Child Support, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments»

Tags: Alimony / Spousal Support, Attorney's Fees, Divorce, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Jurisprudence, South Carolina Court of Appeals Posted in Alimony / Spousal Support, Attorney's Fees, Divorce and Marriage, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Jurisprudence, Law and Culture, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, South Carolina Appellate Decisions 2 Comments»