Not exact matches
Simons sets itself apart
on the experiential aspect
of shopping,
appealing to young - ish, fashion - conscious shoppers who appreciate high style, but shop at a
number of price
points.
(As propaganda depends
on quantity and repetition... The truth just needs to be heard by a thinking mind...) So truthful questions and truthful evidence and truthful doubts and truthful counter
points are attacked, vilified (usually «attack the messenger»), deleted, and drowned out in a flood
of non-sequitur and
appeal to authority arguments... (Another useful tool, btw, is just to measure the
number of Logical Fallacies vs correct logical syllogisms... the more LF the more it's propaganda... the more correct logical syllogisms, data included btw, the less propaganda and the more honest science... but I haven't named that thought tool yet... Perhaps the LF Ratio?
p.s. by the way Bob, the reason I
pointed out that there were only 77 votes explicitly for Malcolm R was as a reassurance that the kind
of psychopathology
on display only
appeals to a very limited,
number of fringe dwellers.
Yet Justice Veldhuis does seem to acknowledge there is an arguable
point on whether the 8000 resident threshold is merely an aspirational target or a hard cap (at para 41) but then goes
on to more or less crunch the
numbers and conclude this development project is not going to push Banff over 8000 permanent residents and therefore this issue has no chance
of success
on appeal (at paras 42 - 44).
Swern v Amazon Hardwood Centre Inc, 2015 ONSC 7590 [Swern] is a Small Claims Court decision
appealed by the Defendants to the Divisional Court
on a
number of well - reasoned
points of law and fact.
The sun is rapidly setting
on the Essential Phone launch to the
point where no amount
of updates or good press can make this phone
appealing or sell in the
numbers required to make it a success.