In time, he was criticized for overreaching and being too eager to make headlines; more than a dozen convictions were tossed out following a 2014
appeals court decision modifying insider - trading law.
Not exact matches
The recent Maryland
Court of
Appeals decision in Tracey v Solesky
modifies the common law in Maryland regarding liability for bites attributed to dogs the
Court alternately referred to as «pit bull», «pit bull mix» or «cross ‐ bred pit bull mix».
The case was lost before the
Court of
Appeals of the District of Columbia; it is likely that it will return to the Supreme
Court, which may get a chance to
modify its 2007
decision.
The mother
appealed this
decision, arguing that the lower
court had abused its discretion by
modifying the legal custody order, which as a result changed the physical custody order, and challenging whether the
court abused its discretion by reducing the father's support payments.
On
appeal, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal confirmed its earlier decision, and substituted the mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years, noting that it is always «open to Parliament to modify the existing law by appropriate legislation that establishes sentencing criteria for «mercy» killing.&
appeal, the Saskatchewan
Court of
Appeal confirmed its earlier decision, and substituted the mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years, noting that it is always «open to Parliament to modify the existing law by appropriate legislation that establishes sentencing criteria for «mercy» killing.&
Appeal confirmed its earlier
decision, and substituted the mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years, noting that it is always «open to Parliament to
modify the existing law by appropriate legislation that establishes sentencing criteria for «mercy» killing.»
Abbott, Austin, 1831 - 1896 Title Abbott's New York digest: table of cases criticised, presenting
decisions of the
courts of the state of New York, which have been affirmed, reversed or
modified in error or on
appeal, or examined and explained, limited, questioned, overruled, or approved and followed in later
decisions of American or English
courts, or by commentators and text writers: from the earliest period to January 1, 1887 / ed.
The Arizona
Court of
Appeals issued a
decision regarding living together and spousal maintenance in Van Dyke v. Steinle regarding whether a former spouse's cohabitation with another person provides a basis to
modify or terminate an Arizona spousal maintenance award.
Though his
appeal is pending with this
court, father filed verified motions to
modify parenting time and
decision - making in the district
court.
The senior judiciary's frustration at the failure of commercial lawyers to take costs budgeting seriously is well - known and partly explains the severity of the
Court of
Appeal's
decision in Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1537, [2013] All ER (D) 314 (Nov) since
modified by Denton v TH White Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 906, [2015] 1 All ER 880.
Only the file's metadata («properties») show that it was
modified on October 30, 2013, following the
Court of
Appeals decision pointing out the discrepancy.