Sentences with phrase «appeals court judges recently»

Federal appeals court judges recently heard a challenge to the Obama EPA's approval of E15, a blend of 85 percent gasoline and 15 percent ethanol, to be -LSB-...]

Not exact matches

In 1994, President Bill Clinton appointed Mr. Henry to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, where he served until June 2010, most recently as Chief Judge.

Chang Qiang Zhu's behavior began to suffer only after the immigration judge asked him specific questions, such as what form of persecution the Apostle Paul used against Christians and what year Paul converted to Christianity, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled.

According to CSW, the Administrative Court recently decided to dismiss the case, but the judge had not delivered his written decision, which prevented the churches» lawyers from appealing the decision.

The New York Democrat and Trump bumped heads recently over the President's alleged ties to Russia and his Supreme Court nominee, Denver - based 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Neil Gorsuch.

The appeals court cited a Supreme Court decision that had also recently led judges to vacate the conviction of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Sicourt cited a Supreme Court decision that had also recently led judges to vacate the conviction of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon SiCourt decision that had also recently led judges to vacate the conviction of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver.

A three - judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that San Diego County's restrictions on concealed carry permits are unconstitutional.

A district court said Shasta Secondary Home School, recently renamed Shasta Charter Academy, could; a three - judge panel of the 3rd District Court of Appeals ruled it coulcourt said Shasta Secondary Home School, recently renamed Shasta Charter Academy, could; a three - judge panel of the 3rd District Court of Appeals ruled it coulCourt of Appeals ruled it couldn't.

Drawing an analogy with the infamous «Enemies of the People» episode in the UK earlier this year, Mr Justice Fok reassured external observers in his speech that independence had not been compromised and, among other matters, pointed to a recent endorsement of Lord Neuberger, the recently retired President of the UK Supreme Court, in respect of his own position as a non-Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal.

The Globe and Mail had an interesting article recently («The judge who writes like a paperback novelist»)(via How Appealing) about Ontario Court of Appeal Judge David Watt, who has become a bit of a sensation in criminal law circles as the result of a stark transformation in the way he writes his decisjudge who writes like a paperback novelist»)(via How Appealing) about Ontario Court of Appeal Judge David Watt, who has become a bit of a sensation in criminal law circles as the result of a stark transformation in the way he writes his decisJudge David Watt, who has become a bit of a sensation in criminal law circles as the result of a stark transformation in the way he writes his decisions.

Recently in Wouters v Wouters (2018 ONCA 26), the Ontario Court of Appeal held that a motion judge improperly struck the factum and pleadings of a self - represented litigant (SRL).

The British Columbia Court of Appeal recently upheld a trial judge's decision that human sperm is property.

Chief Judge Alex Kozinski of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently spoke at Golden Gate University School of Law's third annual Intellectual Property Distinguished Speaker Program, where he created a buzz when he shared his insight on technology today and how it has greatly impacted the First Amendment.

Recently, I wrote about an Ontario Court of Appeal called Stevens v. Stevens that dealt with a number of issues, among them the question of whether the trial judge's opinion of the husband had been tainted by the fact that the husband had had an extra-marital affair.

State Attorney General Luther Strange is pursuing the case through appellate courts where, most recently, the Alabama Circuit Court of Appeals overturned Judge Todd's decision.

The injustice of this myth of convenience never troubled Robin Hood, but it did worry Hobbes, Bentham and, more recently, the magisterial Lord Brooke, a former chairman of the Law Commission and appeal court judge.

The Court of Appeal for British Columbia recently released a decision that allowed the appeal, on the basis that the trial judge incorrectly applied these principles on the record beforAppeal for British Columbia recently released a decision that allowed the appeal, on the basis that the trial judge incorrectly applied these principles on the record beforappeal, on the basis that the trial judge incorrectly applied these principles on the record before him.

This is essentially the ruling that the Trump Administration recently asked the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals to make in the DOL's appeal from Judge Mazzant's earlier preliminary injunction order.

The Court of Appeal recently upheld a motion judge's decision to dismiss an action due to «inordinate and inexcusable delay.»

The Court of Appeal recently overturned a motion judge's ruling to strike a claim for defamation for not pleading the requisite material facts.

The Ontario Court of Appeal recently released its endorsement in Alfred Wegener Institute v. ALCI Aviation Ltd., 2014 ONCA 398, upholding an order from the application judge that a German arbitral award be recognized and enforced in Ontario as if it were a judgment or order of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

The Court of Appeal recently overturned a summary judgment, finding that the motion judge erred by allowing the dispute to proceed by way of summary judgement due to the fact that the case presented serious evidentiary difficulties which could not be properly addressed in the context of a simplified procedure under rule 76 of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure.

Our B.C. Court of Appeal recently heard an appeal of a Trial Judge's decAppeal recently heard an appeal of a Trial Judge's decappeal of a Trial Judge's decision.

Court News Ohio TV (CNO - TV) includes highlights of recently decided cases from the Ohio Supreme Court, the courts of appeals, and the Ohio Court of Claims; previews of upcoming cases before the Ohio Supreme Court; announcements of proposed rule changes; features on court programs; profiles of judges and court officials; and other news and informaCourt News Ohio TV (CNO - TV) includes highlights of recently decided cases from the Ohio Supreme Court, the courts of appeals, and the Ohio Court of Claims; previews of upcoming cases before the Ohio Supreme Court; announcements of proposed rule changes; features on court programs; profiles of judges and court officials; and other news and informaCourt, the courts of appeals, and the Ohio Court of Claims; previews of upcoming cases before the Ohio Supreme Court; announcements of proposed rule changes; features on court programs; profiles of judges and court officials; and other news and informaCourt of Claims; previews of upcoming cases before the Ohio Supreme Court; announcements of proposed rule changes; features on court programs; profiles of judges and court officials; and other news and informaCourt; announcements of proposed rule changes; features on court programs; profiles of judges and court officials; and other news and informacourt programs; profiles of judges and court officials; and other news and informacourt officials; and other news and information.

Cochran Firm, D.C. Partner and President of the Washington Bar Association Karen E. Evans was recently on hand to help recognize Washington, D.C. Court of Appeals Chief Judge Eric T. Washington with the Ollie May Cooper award.

The Manitoba Court of Appeal has recently confirmed the ability of a judge to order a committee to repay to the estate of a now deceased, formerly incapable, person certain moneys improperly spent, without the necessity of the beneficiaries of the estate having to bring an action against the committee to prove their loss.

Federal Court judges have been elevated in the past (most recently in the case of the Harper government's very first appointment, Justice Marshall Rothstein in 2006), but none had ever been promoted to fill one of the three spots on the Supreme Court reserved for current members of the Quebec bar, the Quebec Superior Court, or the Quebec Court of Appeal.

Still, claiming that a decision by one's own court of appeal (or a higher court in the pecking order, as the case may be) is per incuriam may not be the best professional career move for a judge looking to move up the ladder, albeit it has been done — the former, anyway — recently, too.

The Manitoba Court of Appeal recently held, in Ducharme v. Borden, 2014 MBCA 5, that electronic evidence did not require expert support for a judge to deal with its admissibility.

Judge Richard Posner, the formidable jurist on the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, recently published in the legal journal «Green Bag» a delightfully readable two - part article: «What is Obviously Wrong With the Federal Judiciary, Yet Eminently Curable.»