Sentences with phrase «appeals court judges seemed»

Not exact matches

A majority of the judges on a federal appeals court seemed skeptical of the government's defense for President Donald Trump's executive order restricting travel, during courtroom arguments Monday.

The football world seemed ready to put this issue to rest, but on Monday morning, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed Judge Berman's ruling and ordered the reinstatement of Tom Brady's 4 - game suspension.

Federal appeals court judges don't seem eager to embrace the arguments of lawyers seeking a new trial for Republican former New York Senate leader Dean Skelos.

About the only person who seemed determined to treat Mr. Bharara's appearance as a nonevent was Mr. Cuomo, who sat facing Mr. Bharara but did not speak to him at the swearing - in ceremony of Janet DiFiore, the state's new top judge, at the Court of Appeals.

Federal appeals court judges do not seem eager to embrace the arguments of lawyers seeking a new trial for former New York Senate leader Dean Skelos and his son.

As to the outcome of the appeal, I have read both the State's appeal and GYRO's response and my opinion, having absolutely no legal background, is that I don't see that the State has much of a case; they seem to have thrown themselves on the mercy of the court and asked the judge to be «fair» to the people of New York who will have to pay the large settlement cost.

Since the Chambers Judge's order «would seem to prevent the Province from pursuing all enforcement remedies against [the Respondent], regardless of whether they relate to a specific court proceeding», the Court of Appeal agreed the order inappropriately restrained the lawful conduct of a government official and was, therefore, in the nature of an injunction against the Ccourt proceeding», the Court of Appeal agreed the order inappropriately restrained the lawful conduct of a government official and was, therefore, in the nature of an injunction against the CCourt of Appeal agreed the order inappropriately restrained the lawful conduct of a government official and was, therefore, in the nature of an injunction against the Crown.

Against that background, Apple only asked for 60 cents per device from Motorola (which still seemed too much for Judge Posner, though not for the appeals court), less than one - twentieth of its per - unit damages demand from Samsung in the current case, in which Apple pursued a broader claim construction that enabled it to claim ownership of the whole feature as opposed to a particular internal architecture that can be avoided.

«In short, despite the goals of the Child Protective Services Law, the trial judge seems to have done everything in her power to alienate these parents from their child, appears to have a fixed idea about this matter and, further, she prohibited evidence to be introduced that might have forced her to change her opinion,» the appeals court said.

The Court of Appeal in Imerman therefore seems to be suggesting that if wives discover documentation, they are to rely upon their memory of the documents seen or embark upon a course of action well after the horse has bolted which could prove prohibitively expensive, and which has previously been judged «oppressive» and «a rare weapon for use in extreme or exceptional circumstances» (Burgess v Burgess).

The trial judge's statement of when the but - for test «may be relaxed», if it is intended to relate back to the material contribution test — as it seems to be — amounts to a version of the claim that the Alberta Court of Appeal made in Resurfice, which the Supreme Court expressly rejected.

If, as seems to be the case, the trial judge in the new Fisher trial did apply the Snell robust and pragmatic common sense approach, then, assuming there is an appeal and assuming that Aristorenas is still good law once Clements is decided, the Court of Appeal may have to determine whether Fisher is consistent with Aristoappeal and assuming that Aristorenas is still good law once Clements is decided, the Court of Appeal may have to determine whether Fisher is consistent with AristoAppeal may have to determine whether Fisher is consistent with Aristorenas.

Mind you, all of the judges in various courts so far who have heard IRP appeal cases seem balanced, decent and fair.

In any event, once upon a time, even longer ago, a judge of the Ontario Superior Court (who later became a judge of the Ontario Court of Appeal) made the pointed and poignant observation that it «ignores reality» to expect that a trial judge will use technical principles of stare decisis to avoid applying what seems to be his or her own Court of Appeal's current thinking on some issue.

Some justices seemed sympathetic to the problems caused by splintered opinions for lower court judges especially when, as Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. put it, «If I'm a court of appeals judge, it seems to me the most important thing in deciding the case is to make sure that I'm not reversed.»