Sentences with phrase «appeals courts ruled in»

The trial and appeals courts ruled in favor of the association.
In June 2016, the Supreme Court split 4 - 4 in the case, leaving in place an appeals court ruling in favor of the states..
A federal appeals court ruled in 2015 that the notice can't take place until after biosimilar makers gain approval from the Food and Drug Administration.
The Supreme Court's ruling in McDonnell's case set a precedent that could help others accused of public corruption, including Sen. Robert Menendez (D - N.J.), who is awaiting an appeals court ruling in a corruption case; and former New York State Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver (D), who is aiming to overturn his corruption conviction.
NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio explained why he has refused to comment on the blockbuster appeals court ruling in favor of ex-Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, claiming he hasn't «paid attention» to the state's biggest political corruption case in decades.
In its decision regarding Silver's case, the appeals court ruled in 2017 that the definition of official corruption provided to the jurors differed from the one used by the U.S. Supreme Court when it overturned the corruption conviction of former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, and so it was possible the jury could have ruled differently had it been instructed on the updated definition of the law.
A recent appeals court ruling in a case that grew out of PSEG Long Island's expansion of an electrical substation on Old Stone Highway in Amagansett, represents a mixed decision for East Hampton Town, which had sought to hold the utility provider to local zoning laws that would have required planning board review of the project.
Reacting to the appeal court ruling in a statement issued in Akure, Abraham described the ruling as a «quit notice» to the governor and his supporters, saying the ruling was a clear indication that democracy was being strengthened and becoming more people - oriented.
Mayor de Blasio on Sunday explained why he's refused to comment on the blockbuster appeals court ruling in favor of ex-Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver — by claiming he hasn't «paid attention» to the state's biggest political corruption case in decades.
A state appeals court ruled in 2009 that property owners of Stuyvesant Town had illegally raised rents because of receiving J - 51 tax breaks.
A federal appeals court ruled in December 2010 that the agency lacked authority over e-cigs because they offer only the recreational benefits of a regular cigarette.
A U.S. Appeals Court ruling in a University of Chicago case has lowered the barrier for court review of claims by postdoctoral students and junior faculty that they have been denied financial rewards from discoveries in which they have participated.
Since then, the appeals court ruled in Warshak, technology had changed dramatically: «Since the advent of e-mail, the telephone call and the letter have waned in importance, and an explosion of Internet - based communication has taken place.
http://bit.ly/1T8ZKZX We will learn more about his plans for K - 12 education as he will address the Louisiana Federation of Teachers at their annual meeting today in Lake Charles.National Review» sanalysis of Louisiana's election includes «pro-reform education group produced TV ads and mailers» and federals appeals court ruling in favor of Louisiana Scholarship Program.
Appeals Court Rules in Favor of State's Largest Private School Choice Program http://bit.ly/2aZ5p8O
The district last year appealed a court ruling in the parents» favor and the case is pending.
The Appeal Court ruled in her favour, finding that the motion judge had made several procedural errors.
The appeal court ruled in Allen v GMB, that GMB indirectly discriminated against female staff at Middlesbrough Borough Council when it recommended that members accept an equal pay deal, even though it undervalued the women's claims.
In 2004, the Appeal Court ruled in the province's favour, finding that EI should only be used to replace wages of those who have lost their jobs, not to fund social programs.
The appeal court ruled in Haines v Hill and another that Wendy Haines's # 120,000 share in the matrimonial home — which she had been forced to give up after her ex-husband became insolvent — should be returned to her.
In 2012, a district court found the case in favor of Google, but, in May of last year, the judge's ruling was overturned when an appeals court ruled in favor of Oracle.
The owners sued and both the trial court and later the appeals court ruled in favor of the owners.

Not exact matches

In April, the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Aereo could continue to operate while the New York litigation moves forward.
Gay marriage has been legal in Indiana since last October, when the Supreme Court declined to take up a challenge to a federal appeals court ruCourt declined to take up a challenge to a federal appeals court rucourt ruling.
In January, a federal appeals court, ruling in favor of Verizon in its suit against the FCC, said the FCC may have overstepped its authority in its 2010 Open Internet rulinIn January, a federal appeals court, ruling in favor of Verizon in its suit against the FCC, said the FCC may have overstepped its authority in its 2010 Open Internet rulinin favor of Verizon in its suit against the FCC, said the FCC may have overstepped its authority in its 2010 Open Internet rulinin its suit against the FCC, said the FCC may have overstepped its authority in its 2010 Open Internet rulinin its 2010 Open Internet ruling.
MILAN, April 23 - A judge ruled in favor of an appeal by Telecom Italia and its leading investor Vivendi to block a vote on some board director replacements proposed by activist fund Elliott at an April 24 shareholders meeting, a court document showed.
He says the court of appeals could indeed tell the FCC that it overstepped its authority in its rule making, and instruct the agency to make new rules.
The state of Florida passed a separate, and more strident, physician gag rule (known as the «Docs vs. Glocks» law) in 2011 — but a federal appeals court overturned that this past February.
A judge ruled in favor of the House in 2016, but an appeal filed by the Obama administration allowed the CSR payments to continue as the case moved its way through the courts.
The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled that even if these allegations are true, Yelp still isn't guilty of extortion.
A judge suspended the lower court's ruling to ban the company from operating in Italy completely, allowing Uber to continue providing services until the appeals process is over.
Separately on Tuesday, a judge for the U.S. Federal Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, ruled narrowly in favor of the subsidies in a case called David King.
A Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco has ruled that a challenge to the state's 145 - year - old ban on prostitution may proceed, saying a 2003 Supreme Court ruling opened the door for closer scrutiny of the law.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will hear an appeal of that ruling later in the month.
While the Supreme Court in October 2015 declined to review the case, the justices in January agreed to review a similar one, Salman's case, in which a federal appeals court in California had issued a potentially conflicting ruCourt in October 2015 declined to review the case, the justices in January agreed to review a similar one, Salman's case, in which a federal appeals court in California had issued a potentially conflicting rucourt in California had issued a potentially conflicting ruling.
In December, the Yukon appeal court sided with the Ross River Dena Council that existing free - entry staking rules conflicted with the constitutional duty to consult aboriginal groups with outstanding land claims, in this case to an area known as the KaskIn December, the Yukon appeal court sided with the Ross River Dena Council that existing free - entry staking rules conflicted with the constitutional duty to consult aboriginal groups with outstanding land claims, in this case to an area known as the Kaskin this case to an area known as the Kaska.
In October, California's state appeals court ruled that a housekeeper could bring a claim against her employer under the state's Fair Employment and Housing Act.
Both appeals courts would have to rule in the administration's favor to allow enforcement of the revised executive order.
Popular social - review site Yelp is in court once again over alleged extortion and review manipulating now that a group of business owners is attempting to appeal a ruling that was dismissed in federal court two years ago.
A U.S. appeals court ruled on Tuesday that record companies and music publishers that once formed part of EMI Group could pursue additional copyright infringement claims in a long - running lawsuit over defunct online music storage firm MP3tunes.
Should the decision end in a draw, the ACA could mean different things in different states, depending on federal court of appeals rulings, legal experts say.
An Italian appeals court ruled the DNA evidence was «flawed» and overturned her conviction in 2011.
Davis sought Supreme Court review after the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in May that the failure to obtain a warrant did not violate Davis» right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Judge Andreas Korbmacher said on Thursday the country's highest federal administrative court would rule on Feb. 27 on an appeal brought by German states against bans imposed by local courts in Stuttgart and Duesseldorf over poor air quality.
Last November, a federal appeals court in New York ruled that a similar program at the Defense Department for «small disadvantaged businesses» was unconstitutional.
In January, a federal appeals court ruled that because ISPs are not regulated as utilities, equal access regulations could not apply to these providers, as they do with telecommunications carriers under the Communications Act of 1934.
EPA first tried to ban the use of asbestos in 1989, but its decision was struck down two years later by a federal appeals court that ruled the agency had exceeded its authority.
The rules, which were upheld by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals earlier in June, ensure that internet service providers treat data equally and can not give or sell access to so - called internet fast lanes that would prioritize certain internet services over others.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said its ruling stemmed from a 2008 decision in which it held that Cablevision Systems Corp. could offer a remote digital video recording service without paying additional licensing fees to broadcasters because each playback transmission was made to a single subscriber using a single unique copy produced by that subscriber.
The federal appeals court in New York ruled that Aereo did not violate the copyrights of broadcasters with its service, but a similar service has been blocked by judges in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z