Sentences with phrase «appear in court several»

Not exact matches

Raymond Abbott's name appeared as lead plaintiff in a court case brought by Camden and several other poor school districts against the State of New Jersey, demanding that the state provide equal funding for all schools.

It appears to us that this matter cooled off for several years while Woyome battled us in court over the GHC51.2 M that was unconstitutionally and fraudulently paid to him.

Charged in May, Berky, who appeared in town court for the first time after several adjournments, was offered, according to court records, a plea of parking on the pavement, a considerable reduction from the original charge but not unusual in a town court with a reputation for leniency for first - offenders.

The two companies, which are named as connected in several court cases and appear together on at least one building permit application, have run into trouble in recent years.

In several cases, Bharara expanded the definition of misappropriated information so much that it appeared — at least according to the appellate courts — to criminalize information that the trader might not have known was stolen in the first placIn several cases, Bharara expanded the definition of misappropriated information so much that it appeared — at least according to the appellate courts — to criminalize information that the trader might not have known was stolen in the first placin the first place.

She added that there are several openly gay judges in New York's lower courts, at least one of whom has been mentioned in the past for a seat on the state's highest court, and appeared on a list of semi finalists in 2014.

But it lost this case, and several appeals, scoring only a minor victory last April when a New York supreme court justice ruled that SUNY Stony Brook had to appear in court to defend its possession of the animals.

No sooner did it appear than I received an e-mail from a reader questioning how several of the sites discussed in the article could claim to have U.S. Supreme Court cases from before there was a Supreme Court.

However, the General Court accepted Gifi's argument that the Board failed to examine all the evidence it had produced, and the Board's judgment did not mention several of the designs cited: «In the present case, it is clear that, in the light of the Board of Appeal's assertion that it was required to re-examine the application for a declaration of invalidity in its entirety, followed by a one - by - one examination of the contested design in relation only to Designs D 1 to D 17, it is impossible to infer from the wording of the contested decision, or the context in which it appears, what is the implied reasoning justifying the failure to take into account Designs D 18 to D 22.&raquIn the present case, it is clear that, in the light of the Board of Appeal's assertion that it was required to re-examine the application for a declaration of invalidity in its entirety, followed by a one - by - one examination of the contested design in relation only to Designs D 1 to D 17, it is impossible to infer from the wording of the contested decision, or the context in which it appears, what is the implied reasoning justifying the failure to take into account Designs D 18 to D 22.&raquin the light of the Board of Appeal's assertion that it was required to re-examine the application for a declaration of invalidity in its entirety, followed by a one - by - one examination of the contested design in relation only to Designs D 1 to D 17, it is impossible to infer from the wording of the contested decision, or the context in which it appears, what is the implied reasoning justifying the failure to take into account Designs D 18 to D 22.&raquin its entirety, followed by a one - by - one examination of the contested design in relation only to Designs D 1 to D 17, it is impossible to infer from the wording of the contested decision, or the context in which it appears, what is the implied reasoning justifying the failure to take into account Designs D 18 to D 22.&raquin relation only to Designs D 1 to D 17, it is impossible to infer from the wording of the contested decision, or the context in which it appears, what is the implied reasoning justifying the failure to take into account Designs D 18 to D 22.&raquin which it appears, what is the implied reasoning justifying the failure to take into account Designs D 18 to D 22.»

Through her long tenure as a front - line trial Crown, Knickle developed a specialty in appellate advocacy, and appeared several times before the Supreme Court of Canada.

Much of what John does involves difficult issues of EU law, and he has appeared several times in the Court of Justice of the European Union, most recently in British Gas Trading v Lock (C - 539 / 12)[2016] ICR 503 (the holiday pay case).

He begins by stating: «as a practising solicitor advocate, I have had the privilege of appearing in the Court of Session on several occasions now, but the commerciality of Courts is something that is...

She has also been closely involved in several cases before the High Court in London, and has appeared before the Court of Appeal and House of Lords (now the Supreme Court).

Lewis Johs» attorneys handle cases in all areas of commercial litigation and regularly appear in state and federal court as well as several forums for alternative dispute resolution.

The order is confounding several lawyers close to the investigation, Cotts writes, in that it appears to conflict with an order by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts transferring the Kozinski investigation to Anthony Scirica, chief judge of the 3rd Circuit in Philadelphia.

He goes on to find several other cases in which the Supreme Court appears to rely on passages from Wikipedia, including one in which the court said, «Wikipedia, like all other external aids to construction, like dictionaries etc., is not an authentic source, although the same may be looked at for the purpose of gathering information.&rCourt appears to rely on passages from Wikipedia, including one in which the court said, «Wikipedia, like all other external aids to construction, like dictionaries etc., is not an authentic source, although the same may be looked at for the purpose of gathering information.&rcourt said, «Wikipedia, like all other external aids to construction, like dictionaries etc., is not an authentic source, although the same may be looked at for the purpose of gathering information.»

Ms. Holley was the on - air legal analyst for KABC Eyewitness News in Los Angeles for several years and has appeared on the Today Show, Good Morning America, PrimeTime Live, Court TV, Fox News and CNN.

In the last year, Frances has appeared several times in the Court of Appeal and also in the Supreme CourIn the last year, Frances has appeared several times in the Court of Appeal and also in the Supreme Courin the Court of Appeal and also in the Supreme Courin the Supreme Court.

Sean appears regularly in the Ontario Superior Court, the Divisional Court, and several administrative panels and tribunals.

Judge Gao mentions that the SPC is looking at the international commercial courts in several jurisdictions, including Dubai and Singapore (as mentioned in the earlier blogpost), but also Abu Dhabi, London's Commercial Court (it appears that someone at the SPC has read this Financial Times article on foreign litigants there), and notes that the Netherlands, Germany, and Belgium are all establishing international commercial courts that use English.

In Metro Detroit alone, six courts have adopted Matterhorn to resolve several different types of cases online, including failure - to - pay and failure - to appear - warrants for qualifying litigants.

While noting that the husband had certain religious rights, his lack of cooperation resulted in direct, substantial harm to the wife, in a situation where he did not even appear at the court hearing, despite being served through several different methods.

What's more, since the decision includes extensive discussion about the many factors that should be considered when looking at a disparate impact claim, the court appears sensitive to the kinds of concerns that were identified by real estate professionals in a working group NAR created several years ago to look at the disparate impact issue.