Sentences with phrase «appear in court where»

In other situations, the driver is likely to surrender her license as a bond to appear in court where he may be required to take a driving school or traffic school course.

Not exact matches

So I look forward to reading this to opposing counsel at the next deposition where I can tell them that I'm not afraid of appearing in court and I'm not intimidated into frivolous claims in search of shake - down money.

Devotees can visit Trafalgar Square — where the evil Daleks first appeared in the «60s — and check out the TARDIS near Earl's Court Station.

Wolfe has substantial experience in corporate lawsuits that appear in the Court of Chancery in Delaware, where he is based; he represented National Amusements in the Viacom - Redstone case, along with Walmart as it battled allegations of bribery in Mexico.

During a given week, he may be called to the home where a child has died, asked to appear in court to help a teen - ager in trouble with the law, consulted by a woman suffering from menopausal emotional problems, called on by a man who has just learned he has cancer, and another whose self - esteem is shaken by mandatory retirement.

Pell appeared for an administrative first hearing in the Victoria state County Court where he will be tried after a magistrate on Tuesday decided he should face a jury but dismissed around half the charges the cleric had faced during a preliminary hearing in a lower cCourt where he will be tried after a magistrate on Tuesday decided he should face a jury but dismissed around half the charges the cleric had faced during a preliminary hearing in a lower courtcourt.

The 18 - year - old appeared before a magistrates court where the man in question admitted to the offences pf stealing and possessing a folding lock knife.

The 30 - year - old appeared in court on Friday where he admitted punching an Everton fan but claimed he acted in self - defence.

The Chinese illegal miners and their Ghanaian accomplices who were arrested on River Ankobra in the Western Region last Friday, appeared at the Sekondi High Court on Monday [March 27th 2017], where they were remanded into police custody to reappear on April 10, 2017.

On Jan. 30, a slimmed - down Matthews, wearing prison greens, shackled hand and foot and escorted by a pair of state corrections officers, appeared briefly in the hallways of the Ulster County Courthouse en route to a holding pen where he was to await a hearing on his alleged failure to abide by restitution order imposed by the court last year as part of his sentence on two counts of grand larceny.

Grant, Harrington and Reichberg appeared in Manhattan federal court in May where a trial date of April 30, 2018, was set.

If they continue to be evasive and fail to comply with criminal summon issued on them by the Federal High Court, Lokoja to appear on 28th March, 2018 to answer to the criminal charges of Conspiracy and Unlawful Possession of Prohibited Firearms against them, the Force, will obtain Warrant of Arrest for the arrest of Senator Dino Melaye and Mohammed Audu and will definitely declare them wanted throughout the country and on INTERPOL platform for them to be arrested in any country where ever they are sighted and handed over to the Nigeria Police Force for continuation of their trial.

Western New York political operative Steve Pigeon is scheduled to appear in federal court this morning in Buffalo, where the government is expected to unseal an indictment against him, according to a source.

Alexandria Duval appears in Albany County Court to waive extradition to Hawaii where she faces a murder charge in connection with the death of her twin sister.

He appeared before justice Kevin V. Hunt of the Shawangunk Justice Court on Monday night, where Hunt adjourned the matter in contemplation of dismissal.

FACE THE MUSIC: Kerry Kennedy appears yesterday in North Castle court, where she claims a seizure caused her car crash.

Set in the Dakota Territory of 1879, where survival is already a challenge, Petty brings a starkly unglamorized sensibility to life and mortality on the Dakota prairie: it opens with a boy come a courting to a farmgirl only to discover a massacre and what appears to be the abduction of the girl.

It shall be a routine use of records in this system to disclose them in proceedings before any court or adjudicative or administrative body before which DOT or any agency thereof, appears, when (a) DOT, or any agency thereof, or (b) Any employee of DOT or any agency thereof (including a member of the Coast Guard) in his / her official capacity, or (c) Any employee of DOT or any agency thereof (including a member of the Coast Guard) in his / her individual capacity where DOT has agreed to represent the employee, or (d) The United States or any agency thereof, where DOT determines that the proceeding is likely to affect the United States, is a party to the proceeding or has an interest in such proceeding, and DOT determines that use of such records is relevant and necessary in the proceeding, provided, however, that in each case, DOT determines that disclosure of the records in the proceeding is a use of the information contained in the records that is compatible with the purpose for which the records were collected.

On the heels of that disappointing decision, I had the hop put back in my step by Tony Mauro's account at The BLT of yesterday's House appropriations subcommittee hearing on the Supreme Court budget, where Justices Clarence Thomas and Stephen Breyer appeared to make the case for the cCourt budget, where Justices Clarence Thomas and Stephen Breyer appeared to make the case for the courtcourt.

This article appeared in the August 2017 issue of the ABA Journal with the headline «Making It Personal: Court limits where plaintiffs can bring claims in 3 rulings»

Still, when I learned that Lilly Ledbetter, a retired Goodyear worker and petitioner in Ledbetter v. Goodyear will address the convention tonight, I could only ask, «Where else but in America does an ordinary person have the chance to appear before both the Supreme Court and a national party convention?»

In future class action claims against nationwide corporate defendants, it appears that the U.S. Supreme Court is generally requiring piecemeal litigation in each state where a plaintiff was injured, instead of allowing for a single consolidated class action in a single state court lawsuiIn future class action claims against nationwide corporate defendants, it appears that the U.S. Supreme Court is generally requiring piecemeal litigation in each state where a plaintiff was injured, instead of allowing for a single consolidated class action in a single state court lawCourt is generally requiring piecemeal litigation in each state where a plaintiff was injured, instead of allowing for a single consolidated class action in a single state court lawsuiin each state where a plaintiff was injured, instead of allowing for a single consolidated class action in a single state court lawsuiin a single state court lawcourt lawsuit.

It appears that this information should be provided only where the failure to do so would be unfair, however according to the Court's interpretation, the principle of fairness in Article 6 always requires the provision of this information.

What is more, the Court's dicta seem to point in a direction where an interpretation of provisions of CFSP acts by the International Court of Justice in The Hague would appear problematic and Member States could accordingly see themselves threatened by infringement proceedings if they participate in such proceedings.

In 2007, Riley became head of the British Columbia Regional Office's appeals group where he conducted hundreds of appeals in the British Columbia Court of Appeal and appeared over a dozen times as lead counsel at the Supreme Court of CanadIn 2007, Riley became head of the British Columbia Regional Office's appeals group where he conducted hundreds of appeals in the British Columbia Court of Appeal and appeared over a dozen times as lead counsel at the Supreme Court of Canadin the British Columbia Court of Appeal and appeared over a dozen times as lead counsel at the Supreme Court of Canada.

There appear to be about a dozen wiretapping cases that made it to the court of appeals in Maryland, and none of them involve implied consent (e.g. where it is announced prior to recording that the call may or will be recorded — prior is mandatory).

As of today, however, courts across the country appear to be divided on the significance of TC Heartland in guiding where patent suits may be filed.

Also with regard to this point the Court's reasoning appears thus to exceed what is dogmatically convincing, with the result that in an area where much could be gained by accession to the ECHR from the perspective of individuals in terms of judicial control, the Court finds it preferable that no one has jurisdiction to the ECHR being granted this privilege.

courts across the country appear to be divided on the significance of TC Heartland in guiding where patent suits may be filed.

But a better definition appears at Harrison v Carswell where Canada's Supreme Court opined (albeit in dissent):

An undertaking refers to a type of release where the accused is required to appear in court on a specific day.

Some might argue that an exception exists in situations where the reader knows the writer — for example, when a well - known appellate lawyer appears before a state appellate judge, that lawyer has appeared before the court many times, and both have been professional colleagues within that legal community.

The question of delays in the Supreme Court will be discussed below where it will be seen that the problem has not gone away, though the delays appear to be more in the time taken between the time of hearing and the date of delivery of judgment rather than in the time taken to have an appeal heard.

The judge was on George W. Bush's short list of picks for Supreme Court, where it appeared that the prospects were slim for another white male in future vacancies.

This case is a timely reminder that the courts are wary of ruling in favour of blood relatives where there appear to be no suspicious circumstances at play other than the person was elderly and thus there might be an assumption that they had been tricked in some way.

The NSRLP was an intervenor in Pintea v. Johns, a case before the Supreme Court of Canada in April where the court determined a self - represented litigant was not in contempt of court for failing to appear at conferences after the court sent notices to his old addCourt of Canada in April where the court determined a self - represented litigant was not in contempt of court for failing to appear at conferences after the court sent notices to his old addcourt determined a self - represented litigant was not in contempt of court for failing to appear at conferences after the court sent notices to his old addcourt for failing to appear at conferences after the court sent notices to his old addcourt sent notices to his old address.

Further, where such issues are properly part of the consultation, the Court appears ready to accept that, in some cases, only the disclosure of a fully executable model will allow adequate consultation on those issues.

The defendant crossappealed against a finding that the court had jurisdiction to grant declarations in a case where the parties before the court were not the parties to the contracts in which the terms appeared.

I am deeply committed to the pursuit of Justice in the Northwest of British Columbia and travel from Prince George through to Queen Charlotte Island where I appear in the provincial and supreme courts on civil law suits, family law cases, and criminal defence cases.

So no matter where you are, you can easily enter your billable time on your mobile phone immediately after appearing in court, taking a call with a client, or responding to a text.

In rare cases where there appears to be an immediate threat of violence, the court may make the order without notice of a hearing being given to the abusive spouse.

The summons you would receive if you are caught with marijuana is not just a ticket, but it is your official notice of when and where you are supposed to appear in court for the charge.

According to Barrie Hanson, Canadian courts have been asked to allow non-lawyer agents to appear for parties, but the exercise of this discretion, in jurisdictions where it exists, will been exercised rarely and with caution.

He began his legal career as a partner with an Edmonton law firm, where he practised as a criminal defence lawyer and appeared as counsel in all levels of court, including the Supreme Court of Cacourt, including the Supreme Court of CaCourt of Canada.

Cross-posted to Library Boy where I refer to other findings by Alarie and Green that show that Supreme Court of Canada justices who served from 1982 - 2004 do not appear to have been particularly ideologically driven, especially in comparison with their colleagues on the U.S. Supreme Court.

where absolutely no harm will be done to your case) we can and do seek judicial approval for our criminal lawyer to appear in court in your jurisdiction by telephone or by other electronic means (ie.

The Court's own reasoning appears at paragraph 392 where it is said that the rationale of immunity remains the par in parem principle and that «the common law rule as to waiver is consonant with elementary good sense by requiring an unequivocal submission to the jurisdiction of the forum state at the time when the forum's state's jurisdiction is invoked against the impleaded state.

In circumstances where a parent acquires the rights and liabilities of a subsidiary it is likely to be the case that the Court of Justice would treat this as including the right to assert any EU legal professional privilege enjoyed by the subsidiary, although the point does not appear to have been tested in jurisprudencIn circumstances where a parent acquires the rights and liabilities of a subsidiary it is likely to be the case that the Court of Justice would treat this as including the right to assert any EU legal professional privilege enjoyed by the subsidiary, although the point does not appear to have been tested in jurisprudencin jurisprudence.

Section 1 includes at RDC 9.31 a provision authorising alternative service in the following terms: «where it appears to the Court that there is a good reason to authorise service by a method not permitted by these Rules, the Court may make an order permitting service by an alternative method.»

In Gaebel v. Lipka, the Plaintiff was a passenger in a motor vehicle where the driver lost control of the... The post Court Of Appeal Rules That Losing Control On The Shoulder Of A Road Is Prima Facie Negligence appeared first oIn Gaebel v. Lipka, the Plaintiff was a passenger in a motor vehicle where the driver lost control of the... The post Court Of Appeal Rules That Losing Control On The Shoulder Of A Road Is Prima Facie Negligence appeared first oin a motor vehicle where the driver lost control of the... The post Court Of Appeal Rules That Losing Control On The Shoulder Of A Road Is Prima Facie Negligence appeared first on.